Efficacy and Safety of Conatumumab Plus AMG 479 in Patients With Advanced Sarcoma S Chawla,1 AC Lockhart,2 N Azad,3 E Elez,4 F Galimi,5 N Baker,6 YJ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

A Proposal for BMS (Dasatinib) in GIST Jon Trent, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Dept. of Sarcoma Medical Oncology The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson.
A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 2 Study of Conatumumab (C) or AMG 479 (A) or Placebo (P) + Gemcitabine (G) in Patients (pts) With Metastatic Pancreatic.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results in Patients with DLBCL.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
ASCO 2009 Safety and Efficacy of AMG 655 Plus Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab (B) for the First-line Treatment of Patients (Pts) With Metastatic.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
A Phase Ib Dose Escalation Trial of SAR (Anti-CD-38 mAb) in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Predictive value of skin-toxicity severity for response to panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analysis of 5 clinical.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Lonial.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
A Randomized, Phase 1/2 Trial of AMG 102 or AMG 479 in Combination With Panitumumab vs Panitumumab Alone in Patients With Wild ‑ Type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
A Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of IMC-11F8, a Recombinant Human IgG 1 Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Monoclonal.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Final Results for the 1703 Phase 1b/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple.
Abstract 4066 A Phase 2 Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of IMC-11F8, a Recombinant Human IgG 1 Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.
KEYNOTE-021: Pembrolizumab + Ipilimumab Active in Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
May 29 - June 2, 2015 KEYNOTE-028: Antitumor Activity With Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-L1- Positive Extensive-Stage SCLC CCO Independent Conference.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
KEYNOTE-028: Pembrolizumab in PD-L1+, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 182.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Pazopanib: the role in the treatment of mRCC
ECHO-204: Preliminary Results of Phase I/II Trial of Epacadostat + Nivolumab in Advanced Solid Tumors CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the 2017.
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
KEYNOTE-023: Pembrolizumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Shows Promising Activity and Safety in R/R MM CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016.
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
- Phase 1 Signalling Study
Phase 1b Study of AMG 655 in Combination With Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab (B) for the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Phase II trial of erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer
Presentation transcript:

Efficacy and Safety of Conatumumab Plus AMG 479 in Patients With Advanced Sarcoma S Chawla,1 AC Lockhart,2 N Azad,3 E Elez,4 F Galimi,5 N Baker,6 YJ Hei,5 H Kindler7 1Sarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA 3John Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA 4Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain 5Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 6Amgen Limited, Uxbridge, UK 7University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, Chicago, IL, USA Abstract: 890126

INTRODUCTION AMG 479 Mechanism of Action AMG 479 is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) Binds to IGF1R and prevents binding of its ligands, IGF-1 and IGF-21

INTRODUCTION (continued) Conatumumab Mechanism of Action Conatumumab is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody against human death receptor 5 (DR5) Binds to DR5, activates caspases, and induces apoptosis2

INTRODUCTION (continued) IGF1R inhibition and DR5 stimulation inhibit the growth of sarcoma cells3,4 In preclinical models, activation of IGF1R can lead to resistance to DR5-induced apoptosis5 Combining AMG 479 with conatumumab may prevent DR5 agonist-resistant cells from escaping apoptosis A multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of conatumumab plus AMG 479 in patients with advanced solid tumors (phase 1b) and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, or sarcoma (phase 2) Among 4 patients with soft tissue sarcoma in the phase 1b study, 1 had stable disease (SD) for 24 weeks and 1 had SD after > 1 year on treatment6 Here we present the results for sarcoma patients enrolled in the phase 2 study

PHASE 2 STUDY OBJECTIVE To estimate the efficacy of conatumumab in combination with AMG 479 as measured by the objective response rate (ORR)

METHODS Phase 2 Study Schema Planned N = 15 per cohort E N R O L M T CONTINUATION OF TREATMENT LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP Sarcoma AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg NSCLC (squamous) AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg KEY ELIGIBILITY Confirmed locally advanced or metastatic disease Measureable disease ≥ 16 years old ECOG PS of 0 or 1 Adequate organ function Informed consent No uncontrolled CNS disease No anti-cancer therapy ≤ 28 days before enrollment No prior treatment with DR agonists nor IGF1R antagonists NSCLC (non-squamous) AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg Pancreatic AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg Ovarian AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg Sarcoma AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg aIf eligible. Two interim analyses of safety data were conducted after at least 15 patients and then 45 patients were enrolled and had completed 1 cycle of treatment. CRC AMG 479 18 mg/kg Conatumumab 15 mg/kg Every 3 weeks for ≤ 24 months

METHODS (continued) Study Design Multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 study of conatumumab in combination with AMG 479 In the phase 1 study, the planned maximum target dose of conatumumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was determined to be safe and well tolerated (as determined by the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities) The phase 2 study was opened for enrollment after the maximum target dose of conatumumab was determined Patients received AMG 479 (18 mg/kg) followed by conatumumab (15 mg/kg) IV every 3 weeks for up to 24 months or until disease progression, intolerable adverse event, death, withdrawal of consent, or administrative decision Tumors were imaged by CT or MRI every 6 weeks for 6 months and every 8 weeks thereafter

METHODS (continued) Endpoints Primary: ORR Confirmed complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) by RECIST v1.0 per investigator review Secondary: time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, incidence of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities, incidence of anti-conatumumab or anti-AMG 479 antibody formation, and PK (Cmax and Cmin for conatumumab and AMG 479)

RESULTS Patient Disposition Median number of infusions per patient = 2 (range, 1 to 7) aIncludes sarcoma (n = 16), squamous NSCLC (n = 4), non-squamous NSCLC (n = 11), CRC (n = 16), pancreatic cancer (n = 16), and ovarian cancer (n = 7). bDiscontinued AMG 479 and conatumumab, 1 due to grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage (not attributed to study drugs); and 1 due to grade 3 constipation, somnolence, and peripheral motor neuropathy (not attributed to study drugs). cDiscontinued conatumumab. dDiscontinued AMG 479.

RESULTS (continued) Patient Demographics aSafety analysis set. Two patients, 1 with sarcoma and 1 with squamous NSCLC, did not receive study drugs.

RESULTS (continued) Baseline Disease Prior treatment Surgery, 14 (93%) Radiotherapy, 11 (73%) Chemotherapy, 15 (100%) Safety analysis set.

RESULTS (continued) Tumor Response aA best overall response of SD required a radiologically determined response of SD or better no earlier than study day 35.

RESULTS Prolonged SD Two other patients had SD at the week-6 assessment All 5 SD patients had multiple lines of prior anticancer therapy, which failed

RESULTS (continued) Safety There were no grade 4 or grade 5 AEs There were no grade ≥ 3 conatumumab- or AMG 479-related AEs Safety analysis set. aIn at least 2 patients. AE, adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS In this diverse and heavily pre-treated population of sarcoma patients: Conatumumab plus AMG 479 was well tolerated Prolonged SD (18 to 46+ weeks) was observed in 3 patients Further study of this drug combination may be warranted

REFERENCES Beltran PJ, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1095-1105. Kaplan-Lefko PJ, et al. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010;9:618-631. Ashkenazi A and Herbst RS. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1979-1990. Olmos D, et al. Cancer J. 2010;16:183-94. Amgen data on file. Chawla SP, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:abstr 3102.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This trial was sponsored by Amgen Inc., ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00819169 Kathryn Boorer from Amgen Inc. provided writing assistance