The Proceedings before the Labor Arbiter or The Commission By: Prof. Tony Ligon Ligon Solis Mejia Florendo & Cruz Law Firm Penthouse Zeta Building 191.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal and State Courts
Advertisements

© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION LAW AND MOTION.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
An Overhaul of Oklahoma’s Workers Compensation System.
1 American Mfg., Warrior & Gulf Courts must not determine the merits of a claim –to be done by arbitrator (per parties’ agreement) –courts may not go beyond.
The Third Chief Justices Roundtable on Environment
P A R T P A R T Foundations of American Law The Nature of Law The Resolution of Private Disputes Business and The Constitution Business Ethics, Corporate.
National Remedies for the purposes of communication under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Janka.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
Objective 1.02 Understand Court Systems and Trial Procedures
Introduction to Legal Process in the United States (1) Sources of law (2) Court system (3) Judicial process Alan R. Palmiter – Jan
International Dispute Resolution Overview Little distinction between interests disputes and right disputes, such as in U.S. and Canada – Grievance Procedures.
Workers Compensation Commission Sian Leathem Registrar 29 September 2008.
The Federal Court System
Hüseyin Arslan, LLM Legal Counsel ERGO Turkey. Hüseyin Arslan, LLM. “Insurance Arbitration [Turkish Practice]”  Insurance litigation in Turkey has long.
The Court System Business Law Mr. DelPriore. Privately Resolved Disputes  Don’t go to court too fast “I’ll sue you.” “I’ll see you in court.” “My daddy.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF WORKING WITHOUT A CONTRACT 2008 Bargaining, Political Action & PR Conference Session 102 MEA Staff Attorneys.
Judgment on Appeal The Court prepares, not the party.
Chapter 3. Purpose: Solving legal disputes and upholding legal rights.
Business Law 290 What is law?. Where does “law” come from Three traditional sources: Force Religion Communal Needs This belief is a form of Legal Realism.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION APPEALS.
The Federal Court System Chapter 18. Section 1: The National Judiciary The Creation of a National Judiciary Articles of Confederation  no national courts.
Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases (A.M. NO SC) 2009 RBAP-MABS National Round table Conference May 12-13, 2009 Hyatt Hotel and Casino Manila.
The Judicial System The Courts and Jurisdiction. Courts Trial Courts: Decides controversies by determining facts and applying appropriate rules Appellate.
Chapter Eight The Industrial Court
The Legal System. Sources of the Law Constitutional Law Statutory Law Administrative Law Case Law (Common Law) Executive Actions.
Chapter 20 Employment Law. Employment-At-Will  According to this doctrine, an employer is permitted to discharge an employee at any time, for any or.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
LW1210 – Labour Law in Canada
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
HN2100 Collective Agreement Administration
2Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART A Dual Court System.
The Hearing Process 1. 2 Notice of Claim Status Issued by Carrier Legally Binding Triggers Protest Period (usually 90 days)
Judicial Branch – Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court Unit IV – Part 2.
Judicial Review The Supreme Court’s power to overturn any law that it decides is in conflict with the Constitution.
MOST FAVORED NATION TREATMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS & INVESTMENT ARBITRATION IN CHINA.
The Judicial Branch “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from.
Miravite, Deborah Mae Pasion, Elen. Composition: 24  8 from workers’ organizations  8 from employers’ organizations  7 preferably from the incumbent.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
ADR UNDER LABOUR CODE 2006.
The U.S. Legal System Module 1 NURS Summer II
Introduction to Legal Process in the United States (1) Sources of law (2) Court system (3) Judicial process.
Settle your claims effectively!. Arbitration Court attached to the Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic and the Agricultural Chamber of the Czech Republic.
Legal Services Public Information Policy Administration Board Services
Sources of the Law Constitutional Law Statutory Law Administrative Law
Mason County School District
Venue Venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for the trial. Generally, proper venue is whether the injury occurred.
U.S. Legal System Chapter 1.
The Judical Branch The federal Court System
Overview of the US Supreme Court
UPDATES /SALIENT FEATURES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Employment Law and Labor Relations in Mexico
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
Chapter 18 Vocabulary: The Federal Court System
Unit 4: Law & the Legal System
Federal Court Systems: Supreme Court
Writs of Mandate A Primer on Traditional and Administrative Writs
Legal Environment for Business in Nepal 26 February 2017
Appeals in Public Retirement Cases
JUDICIAL NOTES.
The Role and Organization of the Courts
The Legal System.
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Presentation transcript:

The Proceedings before the Labor Arbiter or The Commission By: Prof. Tony Ligon Ligon Solis Mejia Florendo & Cruz Law Firm Penthouse Zeta Building 191 Salcedo Street Legaspi Village Makati City Philippines 1229

Jurisdiction of Labor Arbiters & the Commission: original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide, within thirty (30) calendar days after the submission of the case by the parties for decision involving all workers, 1. Unfair labor practice cases; 2. Termination disputes; 3. Claim for reinstatement, claim involving wages, rates of pay, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment; 4. Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages arising from the employer- employee relations;

5. Cases involving the legality of strikes and lockouts; and 6. all other claims arising from employer- employee relations, including those of persons in domestic or household service, involving an amount exceeding five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) Except : Employees Compensation, Social Security, Medicare and maternity benefits, Labor Arbiter - grievance machinery and voluntary arbitration 7. Cases arising from the interpretation or implementation of CBAs / interpretation or enforcement of company personnel policies

Outline of the Procedure: 1. Labor Arbiter Filing of Complaint Arbitration (Try to amicably Settle) Submission of Position Papers Hearing / Clarificatory questions Memorandum of Case Decision

From the - Decision of the Labor Arbiter 2.APPEAL TO NLRC NLRC has e xclusive / appellate jurisdiction over all cases decided by LA Submission of Memorandum of Parties Decision of the NLRC Motion for Reconsideration of the NLRC Final Decision of the NLRC

From the decision of the NLRC 3. Appeal to the COURT OF APPEALS ( CA) Petition for Review on Certiorari with Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) Comment /Memorandum of the other party Decision of the CA Motion for Reconsideration Final Decision of the CA

From the decision of the CA 4.Appeal to the Supreme Court on pure questions of law Petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 rtof the Rules of Court. Decision of the SC Motion for Reconsideration Final Decision

Dates to Remember : 1. Labor Arbiter Mandatory Conference – must beterminated 30 days from first conference Filing of Position Papers – 10 days from notice of termination of mandatory conference Decision of the labor arbiter within 30 calendar days from submission for decision No Motion for Reconsideration of Arbiter’s decision is allowed. If MR is filed, it will be treated as an appeal to NLRC

Labor Arbiter  NLRC 10 calendar days from receipt of decision* Monetary award– perfection of appeal – posting of cash or surety bond Reinstatement- executor, even pending appeal reinstate or payroll reinstatement Memorandum of appeal to be answered within 10 calendar days from receipt Decision of the NLRC – 20 calendar days Final and executory – 10 days from receipt of the parties * No motion or request for extension of the period to appeal

NLRC’s decision Motion for Reconsideration under oath 10 calendar days from receipt of decision Appeal to Court of Appeals * (Special Civil Action by Certiorari under Rule 65) 60 days from notice of judgment / or denial of the motion for reconsideration * A petition for certiorari shall not stay the execution of the assailed decision of the NLRC unless a TRO is issued by CA

Grounds for certiorari: NLRC has acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion Petition for certiorari should be preceded by exhaustion of administrative remedies _________________________________ Certificate of non-forum shopping is a requirement

Labor : Management: Doubt as to the interpretation of labor laws and regulations in favor of labor (Art.4, Labor Code) This is not limited to interpretation of legal provisions. It extends to doubts as to evidence of disputants. “well-settled doctrine” Nicario vs. NLRC Not automatically in favor of labor “ The law is protecting the rights of the laborer authorizes neither oppression nor self- destruction of the employer. More importantly while the Constitution is committed to the policy of social justice and the protection of the working class, it should not be supposed that every labor dispute will automatically be decided in favor of labor.” Meralco vs. NLRC G.R. No July 12, 1989

Thank you