May 2015 Update on Measuring IPv6 Geoff Huston, George Michaelson APNIC Labs March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geoff Huston, APNIC March 2006 APRICOT 2006 IPv4 Numerology.
Advertisements

Is the transition to IPv6 a market failure ? Geoff Huston APNIC The Fine Print: I am not a economist in terms of my professional qualifications or by virtue.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
An Economic Perspective on IPv6 Transition Geoff Huston APNIC.
Where are we with IPv6? Geoff Huston APNIC. The minister for communications and information technology does not believe that regulatory intervention is.
Beyond IPv4 ? Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
Measuring IPv6 Geoff Huston APNIC Labs, February 2014.
1 IPv6 - a small step for IP but a giant leap for Telcos IST’2000 Nice, November 8, 2000 "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" Neil.
ALTTC BSNL. 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Transition cost and penetration curve 4. Theoretical consideration 5. Migration for Large organization 6.
Sofía Silva Berenguer lacnic.net Paramaribo - Surinam IPv4 Exhaustion And IPv6 Deployment.
Comparing IPv4 and IPv6 from the perspective of BGP dynamic activity Geoff Huston APNIC February 2012.
Some Observations on CGNs Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Closer to the Edge? Prospects for household debt repayments as interest rates rise July 2013 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..
BGP in 2009 Geoff Huston APNIC May Conventional BGP Wisdom IAB Workshop on Inter-Domain routing in October 2006 – RFC 4984: “routing scalability.
Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, Asia Pacific Network Information Centre IPv6 Workshop European Digital Agenda Assembly June 2011.
IPv4 Address Exhaustion: A Progress Report Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston, APNIC 31 October 2005 Australian IPv6 Summit.
Doubling down on states for strong growth Maria Senior Sales Analyst March 15 th, 2012.
State of the Industry: Mobile Survey Presented April 22, 2010 eMarketer Conference.
Press launch Doha, Qatar 6 March 2012 Cosmas Zavazava Chief Project Support and Knowledge Management Department ITU/BDT.
IPv6 deployment IPv6 deployment the beauty pageant
IPv6 Deployment Status APEC TEL45, 11/04/2012, Da Nang, Vietnam Miwa Fujii APNIC Senior IPv6 Program Specialist.
IPv6 Emerging Stories of Success NANOG47 John Jason Brzozowski October 2009.
George Michaelson, Geoff Huston APNIC Measuring IPv6 Users.
1 Dave Wilson DW238-RIPE A strategic approach to IPv6.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
The Status of APNIC’s IPv4 Resources: Exhaustion & Transfers Geoff Huston APNIC Labs.
APNIC Update The state of IP address distribution and IPv6 deployment status Miwa Fujii Senior IPv6 Program Specialist APNIC.
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC November 2007.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
Robert C. Atkinson Ivy E. Schultz December 10, 2009 Broadband in America Where It Is and Where It Is Going (According to Broadband Service Providers)
Chapter 3 Growth and Accumulation Item Etc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Macroeconomics, 10e © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Inter-Domain Routing Trends Geoff Huston APNIC March 2007.
Measuring DNSSEC Validation: A Brief Update on DNSSEC Validation numbers, with an Asia Focus Geoff Huston APNIC Labs January 2015.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston November 2004 APNIC.
Is the transition to IPv6 a market failure? Geoff Huston APNIC CAIDA Workshop on Internet Economics (WIE’09) (
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston, APNIC 26 October 2005 ARIN XVI.
IPv6 Deployment Status Elly Tawhai Senior Internet Resource Analyst/Liaison Officer, Pacific, APNIC 5 th APT Policy Regulation Forum for Pacific
IPv6 Transition: A Progress Report Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
APNIC Update Philip Smith Director of Learning & Development, APNIC ARIN st to 24 th April 2013.
DNSSEC – Issues and Achievements Geoff Huston APNIC Labs.
IPv4 Address Lifetime SANOG IV Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
What if Everyone Did It? Geoff Huston APNIC Labs.
George Michaelson, Geoff Huston APNIC Measuring IPv6 Users.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston August 2004 APNIC.
Routing Table Status Report August 2005 Geoff Huston.
The Importance of Responsive Web Design Provide By
IPv6 Deployment: Opportunities and Challenges
More Specific Announcements in BGP
May 2015 Update on Measuring IPv6
Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC Labs
The mainstream telecommunications industry has a rich history
The Status of APNIC’s IPv4 Resources: Exhaustion & Transfers
Addressing 2015 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Addressing 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Geoff Huston APNIC Labs May 2018
IP Addresses in 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
What do you see in these scatter plots?
More Specific Announcements in BGP
Routing Table Status Report
Matías Heinrich VP Operations Latam October 2011
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited
Routing Table Status Report
Routing Table Status Report
IPv6 Reliability Measurements
GDP measures marketed economic activity, not welfare
Presentation transcript:

May 2015 Update on Measuring IPv6 Geoff Huston, George Michaelson APNIC Labs March 2015

IPv6: How Many Can?

IPv6: How Many Can? Weekend numbers are 0.4 % higher then weekday numbers 0.2% of users prefer to use V4 in dual stack scenarios IPv6 use has doubled across 2014

Forward Guesstimates Best Case: IPv6 uptake doubles every year: 2019 (though it has to be observed that the first four months of 2015 are tracking nowhere near a constant doubling rate, so this looks like a stretch objective!) Worst Case: IPv6 additional uptake constant at a further 2% every year: 2067 (this is insane! If the transition takes longer than 10 more years from now then IPv6 is looking more and more like a discarded hIstorical objective )

IPv6: Who Can? IPv6 use by Country – May 2015

IPv6: Who Can? World Average

The Local View: NL

The Country View for the US

7 providers in the US are supporting the majority of IPv6 use in the country. This is not an unusual scenario

Concentration of IPv6 Does this concentration of effort hold for the rest of the world? How many IPv6-enabled ISPs serve the majority of the world’s IPv6 user population?

The Internet’s IPv6 Top 30 Here we’ve combined estimates of the Internet user population per country (ITU data) with estimates of market share of each provider (APNIC data) with the observations of the percent of users in each AS that appears to be IPv6 capacle – this gives an estimate of the number of IPv6 users behind each provider

The Internet’s IPv6 Top 30

It’s a very uneven takeup of IPv6 – 94% of the world’s IPv6 users sit behind just 30 ISPs

Some Observations If you allow the customer to own and maintain their own CPE then the CPE upgrade path is a critical issue – old CPE drags the IPv6 numbers down Mobile providers should see higher penetration numbers … but legacy handsets seem to pull the numbers down There are some high penetration numbers on “greenfield” deployments, but its rare to see: 49,AS16591,"GOOGLE-FIBER - Google Fiber Inc.",US,155096,87.3%

The Internet’s 30 Largest ISPs

Some Further Observations IPv6 support is still very patchy: While most of the V6 activity in terms of user counts is confined to 30 ISPs, just 5 of the top 30 largest ISPs have any significant IPv6 deployments The Internet is heavily skewed The 30 largest ISPs service 42% of the entire Internet user population If these 30 providers were to achieve an average 50% IPv6 uptake in their customer base, then the total IPv6 capability level across the entire Internet would be 20% today, rather than 3.6%

Maybe there is more to it… A number of these largest ISPs operate in the developing world – With a tendency to be late adopters so as to reduce capital risk for their enterprise So can we look at the “value” of an ISP’s customers? – One possible approach is to multiply the estimated user population by the per capita GDP in that country – Perhaps this ranking exposes those ISPs who can afford to deploy V6, but so far have not moved

The Internet’s 30 Most Valuable ISPs

“Net User Value” Lets multiply the estimated user population by the GDP per capita 30 providers (by AS) account for 43% of the estimated “value” base of of the Internet Just 6 of these providers have significant IPv6 deployment programs One view is that if/when all of these 30 ISPs complete a large scale IPv6 deployment, then they would exert a very strong “pull through” effect on the entire Internet because these most valuable ISPs tend to have the greatest “influencer” ability on the ISP space

Another View of IPv6

Maybe IPv6 is further ahead than we thought… The 30 largest IPv6 providers account for 94% of the total IPv6 user population These same 30 providers also encompass 28% of the total “user value” of the Internet

The “Net User Value” view of the IPv6 Internet

IPv6 Today… Is being used by some 4% of the world’s users Is being actively deployed in significant volumes in 20 countries 30 ISPs serve the bulk of the V6 user population These providers represent 28% of the “net user value” of the Internet Their IPv6 users represent 7% of the total “net user value” of the Internet

Thanks!