A Comparison of Recoupled Pair Bonding in Carbon and Sulfur: States of CX and CX 2 (X=H,F) Lu Xu Lu Xu, D. E. Woon, T. H. Dunning, Jr. TI13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories
Advertisements

Chapter 6: covalent compounds
Theoretical Studies of Observable Transitions to Recoupled Pair Bonded States of Sulfur Halide Compounds Jeff Leiding, D. E. Woon, T. H. Dunning, Jr. University.
Bonding in ClF n (n=1-7): Further Insights into Hypervalent Molecules and Recoupled Pair Bonds Lina Chen, David E. Woon and Thom H. Dunning Department.
New Perspective on PF n (n=1-5) from the Recoupled Pair Bonding Model: A Quantum Chemical Study David E. Woon & Thom H. Dunning, Jr. TI12.
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories CHEMISTRY The Central Science 9th Edition David P. White.
1 Covalent Bonding: Molecular Geometry Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Molecular Orbitals.
Theoretical Predictions of the Structures and Energetics of ClF n +/- (n =1-6) Ions: Extended Studies of Hypervalent Species Using the Recoupled Pair Bonding.
Chem 125 Lecture 13 10/3/08 This material is for the exclusive use of Chem 125 students at Yale and may not be copied or distributed further. It is not.
Homework DUE Friday, 5 Sept Problems in McMurry 1.24; 1.28; 1.31; 1.45; 1.46; 1.47 => (1.48—1.52 BONUS Problems) Organic Chemistry - 246A.
Molecular Orbital Theory Edward A. Mottel Department of Chemistry Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Molecular Orbital Theory
Valence Bond Theory and Molecular Orbital Theory
John E. McMurry Paul D. Adams University of Arkansas Atomic and Molecular Orbitals.
VSEPR Theory
Covalent Bonding: Orbitals.  Some atoms will form hybridized orbitals when bonding with other atoms. There are three that are included on the AP exam.
Base Pairing in DNA. Red = O Grey = C White = H Purple = K Ionic Radii Li + = 0.68 Å Na + = 0.97 Å K + = 1.33 Å Rb + = 1.47 Å Cavity Size (O-O Dist.)
Lewis Structures –Bond Pairs and Lone Pairs In Lewis structures with five or six pairs of electrons around the central atom we need to distinguish between.
AP Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories HW:
Chemistry 100 Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
ULTRAVIOLET-VISIBLE SPECTROSCOPY (UV-VIS). UV-VIS Absorbance of energy in the UV-Vis region results in the movement of an electron from the ground state.
The First and Second Recoupled Pair Bonds in Sulfoxy Species Tyler Takeshita, D. E. Woon, T. H. Dunning, Jr. Department of Chemistry University of Illinois.
Chemistry 100 Chapter 9 Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories.
How Ligand Properties Affect the Formation and Characteristics of Recoupled Pair Bonds Beth A. Lindquist, David E. Woon, and Thom H. Dunning 06/23/2011.
Energy level diagram EA -  EA +  B A .
Covalent Bonding Orbitals Adapted from bobcatchemistry.
June 10, 2009 – Class 37 and 38 Overview
Unit 3 Summary. Crystal Field Theory x z y M n Which d-orbitals are effected the most?
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10.
Molecular Geometry and Bonding Theories. Physical and chemical properties of a molecule are determined by: size and shape strength and polarity of bonds.
1 Chapter 10 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization.
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  Permission required.
Molecular Geometry & Bonding Theories Chapter 9. Molecular Shapes  Lewis Structures that we learned do not tell us about shapes, they only tell us how.
Hybrid Orbitals. Why Covalent Bonds Exist Atoms share electrons when their orbitals overlap When orbitals overlap, electrons are simultaneously attracted.
Ch. 9 Molecular Geometry & Bonding Theories
The Low-Lying States of SF n Species (n=1-6): Insights into Hypervalency from the Recoupled Pair Bonding Model David E. Woon & Thom H. Dunning, Jr. RJ07.
Covalent Bonding: Orbitals
1 Chapter 9 Orbitals and Covalent Bond. 2 Molecular Orbitals n The overlap of atomic orbitals from separate atoms makes molecular orbitals n Each molecular.
Organic Pedagogical Electronic Network Molecular Orbitals Mariana Neubarth Coelho Edited by Margaret Hilton Honors Organic Chemistry University of Utah.
Molecular Orbitals. Organic compounds are organised into groups according to similarities and differences in their structure. Groups of atoms within a.
A Quantum Chemical Study of HZnCH 3 A Transition Metal Compound with 4s 2 Recoupled Pair Bonding David E. Woon & Thom H. Dunning, Jr. RI12.
VSEPR model for geometry of a molecule or an ion
CHE2201, Chapter 2 Learn, 1 Polar Covalent Bonds: Acids and Bases Chapter 2 Suggested Problems ,25-6,31,34,36,39- 40,51-2.
Theoretical Studies of Electronic Spectra and Bonding in AlCl/AlF Jeff Leiding, D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning, Jr. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Theories of Covalent Bonding
Vibronic Perturbations in the Electronic Spectrum of Magnesium Carbide Phalgun Lolur*, Richard Dawes*, Michael Heaven + *Department of Chemistry, Missouri.
Laser spectroscopy of a halocarbocation: CH 2 I + Chong Tao, Calvin Mukarakate, and Scott A. Reid Department of Chemistry, Marquette University 61 st International.
Bonding in methane The simplest alkane, methane, has the molecular formula CH 4. Justify that formula. Write the electronic configuration of carbon and.
Organic Chemistry Review Part II. Organic Chemistry: Carbon Atom 1. Structural Classifications 2. Atomic Theory 3. Dipoles & Resonance 4. Isomers 5. Functional.
Valence Bond Theory * Why doing VB? * Basic principles * Ab initio methods * Qualitative VB theory.
Dr. S. M. Condren Chapter 9 Ionic and Covalent Bonding.
Introduction to Molecular Orbital Theory.
1 Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals.
1.9 Hybridized Atomic Orbitals
Overlap and Bonding We think of covalent bonds forming through the sharing of electrons by adjacent atoms. In such an approach this can only occur when.
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  Permission required.
The University of Illinois
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10.
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  Permission required.
Polar Bonds and Their Consequences
AP Chem Turn in “Naming Practice WS” if you did not turn it in to the sub on Friday. Pull up “Phet Molecule Shapes” on your laptops and complete the.
Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Geometry and Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals Chapter 10.
Covalent Bonds Main Concept:
Chemical bonding II UNIT 8
Chapter 7: Covalent Bonds and Molecular Structure
Chapter 6 Preview Multiple Choice Short Answer Extended Response
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
Chapter 9 Molecular Geometries and Bonding Theories
Presentation transcript:

A Comparison of Recoupled Pair Bonding in Carbon and Sulfur: States of CX and CX 2 (X=H,F) Lu Xu Lu Xu, D. E. Woon, T. H. Dunning, Jr. TI13

Outline X=H,F  Recoupled Pair Bonding in Sulfur  Recoupled Pair Bonding in Carbon: compare and contrast with Sulfur  Substituent effects: H and F C, S CX, SFCX 2, SF 2

 RCCSD(T) and CASSCF/MRCI(+Q)  Basis sets: aug-cc-pV(T,Q,5)Z  GVB diagrams/orbitals  Molpro Methodology

Overview of Recoupled Pair Bonding (RPB) in SF n S normal covalent bond F + F + S Recoupled Pair Bond S F 2Π2Π S F 4Σ-4Σ-  SF, SF 2 excited states, SF 3 -SF 6 ground states  RPB explains the hypervalency of S Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 133, 7915 Carbon? RPB: 3 e - process

C vs. S RHF S 3s 2 3p x 1 3p y 1 3p z 2 C 2s 2 2p x 1 2p y 1 (2s 2 - c 2 2 2p z 2 )2p x 1 2p y Overlap 3s 2 3p x 1 3p y 1 (3p z 2 - c 1 2 3d z2 2 ) GVB (MCSCF) + C X X (X=H,F) 4Σ-4Σ- Recoupled Pair Bond ? CX

4Σ-4Σ- 2Π2Π Potential energy curves of the low lying 2 Π and 4 Σ - states of SH, SF, CH and CF at MRCI+Q/AV5Z level (energies in E h, bond lengths in Å) Similarity:  All have 2 Π ground states; Three have bound 4 Σ - excited states CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Differences:  SH has repulsive 4 Σ - state  ∆E( 4 Σ Π )  ∆r e ( 4 Σ Π )

CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Two questions: 1. Are the 4 Σ - states in CH and CF Recoupled Pair Bonding states? 2. What causes the differences between the curves? What are the differences between C and S Recoupled Pair Bonding?

CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Two questions: 1. Are the 4 Σ - states in CH and CF Recoupled Pair Bonding states? 2. What causes the differences between the curves? What are the differences between C and S Recoupled Pair Bonding?

SF, CH and CF 4 Σ - GVB Orbital Animations SF σσLσL σRσR RPB: 3 e - process SFSFSF CH CH C HC H CF CF CF CF

SFSF SF SF and CF 4 Σ - GVB Orbital Snapshots S-FC-F The orbitals distinctly exhibit recoupling in both cases! C F Woon, D. E.; Dunning, T. H., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 133, 7915 σ σLσL σRσR σσLσL σRσR C F

CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Two questions: 1.Are the 4 Σ - states in CH and CF Recoupled Pair Bonding states? C has similar Recoupled Pair Bonding as S, CH and CF 4 Σ - states are recoupled states

CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Two questions: 1.Are the 4 Σ - states in CH and CF Recoupled Pair Bonding states? C has similar Recoupled Pair Bonding as S, CH and CF 4 Σ - states are recoupled states

CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Two questions: 1.Are the 4 Σ - states in CH and CF Recoupled Pair Bonding states? C has similar Recoupled Pair Bonding as S, CH and CF 4 Σ - states are recoupled states 2. What causes the differences between the curves? What are the differences between C and S Recoupled Pair Bonding?

4Σ-4Σ- 2Π2Π CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Difference (1) SH has repulsive 4 Σ - state CH and SF have stable 2 Π and 4 Σ - states repulsive Potential energy curves of the low lying 2 Π and 4 Σ - states of SH, SF, CH and CF at MRCI+Q/AV5Z level (energies in E h, bond lengths in Å)

C vs. S: GVB Overlap  Smaller GVB overlap means weaker coupling Therefore, it is easier to recouple the 2s 2 pair of C than the 3p 2 pair of S  Greater electronegativity means better ability to recouple Therefore, F is better at recoupling than H C GVB overlap: GVB overlap: S

4Σ-4Σ- 2Π2Π CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Difference (2) Different ∆r e ( 4 Σ Π ) CH & CF: r e ( 2 Π ) and r e ( 4 Σ - ) are nearly the same SF: r e ( 4 Σ - ) is much longer than r e ( 2 Π ) Potential energy curves of the low lying 2 Π and 4 Σ - states of SH, SF, CH and CF at MRCI+Q/AV5Z level (energies in E h, bond lengths in Å)

C vs. S: Non-Bonding vs. Anti-Bonding 4 Σ - Left-over singly occupied orbital S: strong anti-bonding character, weakens the bond C: non-bonding orbital, localized outside of bond region r e ( 2 Π ):1.274 Å FC r e ( 4 Σ - ):1.325 Å occ 1.98occ 1.00 C F C F r e ( 4 Σ - ):1.901 Å r e ( 2 Π ):1.605 Å S F occ 2.00 occ 1.00 SFSF Two types of Recoupled Pair Bonding: C-type and S-type MRCI/AV5Z

4Σ-4Σ- 2Π2Π CX and SX (X=H,F): Potential Energy Curves Difference (3) ∆E( 4 Σ Π ) CH < CF Potential energy curves of the low lying 2 Π and 4 Σ - states of SH, SF, CH and CF at MRCI+Q/AV5Z level (energies in E h, bond lengths in Å)

C vs. S & H vs. F ∆E( 4 Σ Π ):CH < CF C-F: unfavorable  interaction in 4 Σ - C-H: no  interaction 2Π2Π occ: 3.98 occ: Σ-4Σ- occ: 4.00 occ: 2.00 Puzzle: H has less decoupling ability than F CF<CH

Summary of Recoupled Pair Bonding in CX (X=H,F)  CX has similar RPB 4 Σ - states as in SF  CX and SX have two different types of RPB: one has singly occupied non-bonding orbital, the other has singly occupied anti-bonding orbtial  Different  interactions influence the energy separations of recoupled states and ground states of CX What about CX 2 ? Still similar as SF 2 ?

CX 2 (X=H,F): Predictions of Low-Lying States 4Σ-4Σ- 1A11A1 CX 2 CX 2Π2Π X (X=H,F) 3B13B1 3A23A2 C

CX 2 (X=H,F): 3 B 1 and 1 A 1 3B13B1 1A11A1 X (X=H,F) r e =1.078 Å A= o BE=122.5 Kcal/mol r e =1.109 Å A= o BE=96.4 Kcal/mol r e =1.300 Å A= o BE= 125.2Kcal/mol r e =1.314 Å A= o BE=149.5 Kcal/mol CH 2 CF 2 SF 2 r e = Å A= 97.9 o BE= 91.0 Kcal/mol r e = Å A= o BE= Kcal/mol RCCSD(T)/AVQZ BE:Bond Energy recoupled state Ground States covalent state

CX+X and SF+F ( 3 Σ - ): GVB Orbitals Animations SF( 4 Σ - )+F( 2 P): The singly occupied anti-bonding orbital delocalizes onto the incoming F; the anti-bonding character is largely reduced CH( 4 Σ - )+H( 2 S), CF( 4 Σ - )+F( 2 P): Due to the non-bonding nature of the singly occupied orbital on C, the orbitals don’t delocalize and change much SF F CH H C F F X=H,F

CH 2 1A11A1 recoupled state 3B13B1 3A23A2 CH 4Σ-4Σ- 2Π2Π recoupling/hypervalent colvalent w/left-over e- colvalent CH 2, CH 3 and CH 4 are hypervalent in RPB sense! ∆E=9.3 ∆E=64.5 RCCSD(T)/AVQZ; ∆E in Kcal/mol ∆E=16.8 CH 3, CH 4 C

Conclusion  Carbon has Recoupled Pair Bonding, similar as Sulfur  CX(X=H,F) and SF recoupled 4 Σ - are different in the nature of singly occupied orbital  CH 2, CH 3 and CH 4 ground states are recoupled states, so C is hypervalent in RPB sense

Acknowledgement  Dunning group: Prof. Thom Dunning, Dr. David Woon, Dr. Lina Chen, Jeff Leiding, Beth Lindquist, Tyler Takeshita  Funding: The Distinguished Chair for Research Excellence in Chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign