Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1222r1 SubmissionSlide 1 Doppler Effect Evaluation for 11ax Date: 2014-09-12 Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. Sep 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spectrum Sensing for DVB-T OFDM Systems Using Pilot Tones
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1146r0 Submission Update on HEW Channel Model Slide 1 Date: Authors: July 2013 Shahrnaz Azizi (Intel)
Preamble Considerations in Large Channel Delay Spread Scenarios
July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0823r0 Submission Progress Report for Corridor Channel Model for TGac Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRI Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0996r2 Aug 2013 Josiam, Taori, Tong - SamsungSlide 1 Outdoor Channel Model Candidates for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0436r0 Submission February 2011 Mediatek Path Loss and Delay Spread Models for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Wireless and Mobile Communication Systems
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1452r0 November 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency selective scheduling in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE g Submission November 18, 2009 John Geiger GE Digital Energy Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /0858r0 Submission Enhanced Channel Model for HEW Slide 1 Date: Authors: July 2013 Shahrnaz Azizi (Intel)
Doc.: IEEE /0825 Submission July 2012 Smoothing Bit and Beam-Change Indication Bit for 2MHz Preamble Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan.
Doc.: IEEE /0090r0 SubmissionMartin Jacob, TU Braunschweig January 2010 Slide 1 Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel.
Doc: IEEE /1356 Submission December 2012 Jianhan Liu, Mediatek, etc.Slide 1 Discussions On Usage Models for Portable and Mobile Devices Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0868r0 July 2015 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of Frequency Selective Scheduling Feedback for OFDMA Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1233r3 Submission Sep 2011 Slide 1 Passive Scanning Improvement Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1289r0 Submission November 2015 Thomas Handte, SonySlide 1 Non-Uniform Constellations for 1024-QAM Date: 2015/11/08 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r1 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1214r0 September 2014 Leif Wilhelmsson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Impact of correlated shadowing in ax system evaluations.
Doc.: IEEE /1064r2 Submission Channelization for 11ac Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: September 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /0386r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Discussions on MCS selection for SLS calibration Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek March.
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r0 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE /0841r0 Submission May 2011 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 Verification of TGai Requirements Date: Authors:
IEEE q Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE /0970r1 Submission July 2011 Guixia Kang, BUPTSlide 1 IEEE ah Healthcare Use Cases Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 Submission Further Analysis of Feedback and Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA July 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
2840 Junction Ave, San Jose, CA 95134, USA
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
<month year> <month year> doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Usage of Doppler Bit in 11ax
Proposed TGac Channel Model Revisions (for r6)
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Terminology for AP Coordination
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
<month year> doc.: IEEE /453r0-SG3a November 2002
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Terminology for AP Coordination
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: Authors: September 2010
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Pathloss and Channel Model Considerations for P802.11ah
OFDMA Performance Analysis
PHY Abstractions Types For HEW System Level Simulations
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: XX Authors: September 2010
Submission Title: Channel Coherence due to mobile vehicles
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 SubmissionSlide 1 Doppler Effect Evaluation for 11ax Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. Sep 2014

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission July 2013 Slide 2 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. Introduction IEEE ax outdoor operation focus on pedestrian mobility, reflections from fast moving objects, such as cars, can cause higher Doppler. In [1], the following two Doppler modes should be supported in the outdoor spatial channel models. –1. Speed up to 3kmph for all clusters for UMi and UMa models; (STA velocity = 3 kmph) –2. The TBD cluster of UMi and UMa models assigned a speed of 60kmph and the rest of the clusters assigned 0 kmph

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Doppler Effect due to a Moving STA July 2013 Slide 3 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. In [2], a theoretical model is built where the change of phase due to a moving station (STA) between time t and t + Δt is given by where θ p is the incident angle of the p th propagation path into a received and v m is the moving velocity of station.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Doppler Effect due to a Moving Cluster (Scatter) July 2013 Slide 4 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. In [2], a theoretical model is built where the change of phase due to a moving p th scatter (or cluster) between time t and t + Δt is given by –Where α p is the angle between the direction of scatter (or cluster) movement, –γ p the direction orthogonal to the reflecting surface and the reflection angle and v is the moving velocity of the cluster. –By proper selection of these angles different Doppler spectrums may be achieved. –The model is also adopted for B5 – stationary feeder scenario in Winner II channel mode [3].

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Comments July 2013 Slide 5 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. We find out that if we assume Doppler on one cluster only, to assign a speed of 60kmph to cluster 2 or 3 has similar Doppler effect. If we consider that there might be two fast moving objects (say, two cars running nearby), then the Doppler effect is much more severe. To make our 11ax more robust in outdoor scenario, we might need to take care of more severe cases, so there are two options for us to consider.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Options July 2013 Slide 6 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. Option 1: The 2 nd cluster of UMi and UMa models assigned a speed of 60kmph and the rest of the clusters assigned 0/3 kmph. Option 2: The 2 nd and the 3 rd clusters of UMi and UMa models assigned a speed of 60kmph and the rest of the clusters assigned 0/3 kmph. Option 0 (for comparison): No moving cluster and the rest of the clusters assigned 0/3 kmph.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Evaluation Setup July 2013 Slide 7 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. We obtain the autocorrelation of the channel impulse response over time samples in time domain. We average the autocorrelation over 1000 channel realizations. The time sample duration is set equal to be 1/(4*f D ) ≈ 0.9 ms, where f D is the maximum Doppler frequency shift with velocity of 60 km/hr. –For comparison, we only show the time scale from 0 to 100 msec. –We also zoom out each result with time scale from 0 to 5 msec.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission STA velocity = 3 km/hr (NLoS) July 2013 Slide 8 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission July 2013 Slide 9 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. STA velocity = 3 km/hr (LoS)

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission July 2013 Slide 10 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. STA velocity = 0 km/hr (NLoS)

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission July 2013 Slide 11 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. STA velocity = 0 km/hr (LoS)

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Conclusions July 2013 Slide 12 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. When we consider the Doppler effects from both moving station and scatter, –Long-term time scale (0 – 100 msec): the Doppler effect of moving STA dominates the performance. –Short-term time scale (0 – 2 msec): the Doppler effect of moving scatters dominates the performance. In turn, when we consider Doppler effects only from the movement of some scatters, the correlation coefficients will be degraded to be from 0.6 to 0.9 under NLoS scenario. –However, under LoS scenario, the correlation coefficients will be degraded to be from 0.95 to It is natural to consider only one fast moving object or two fast moving objects cases: –Option 1 (one fast moving object): The 2 nd cluster of UMi and UMa models assigned a speed of 60 kmph and the rest of the clusters assigned 3 kmph. –Option 2 (two fast moving objects): The 2 nd and the 3 rd clusters of UMi and UMa models assigned a speed of 60 kmph and the rest of the clusters assigned 3 kmph.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Straw Poll #1 Do you support to add the following Doppler effect to IEEE ax channel model document –The 2 nd and the 3 rd clusters of UMi and UMa models assigned a speed of 60 kmph and the rest of the clusters assigned 3 kmph. Sep 2014 Slide 13 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc.

doc.: IEEE /1222r1 Submission Reference Slide 14 Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek Inc. May2014 [1] “IEEE ax Channel Model Document”, IEEE /0882r3, Jianhan Liu, etc. [2] Thoen, S.; Van der Perre, L.; Engels, M., "Modeling the channel time-variance for fixed wireless communications," Communications Letters, IEEE, vol.6, no.8, pp.331,333, Aug [3] IST-WINNER D1.1.2 P. Kyösti, et al., "WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.2, Apr