Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS1 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The assumption of maximizing behavior lies at the heart of economic analysis. Firms are assumed to maximize economic profit. Economic profit is the difference.
Advertisements

General Equilibrium (Welfare Economics). General Equilibrium u Partial Equilibrium: Neglects the way in which changes in one market affect other (product/factor)
TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 3 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS.
Chapter 16. GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM AND MARKET EFFICIENCY McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter.
Equity, Efficiency and Need
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 3 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS.
Chapter Twenty-Nine Exchange. u Two consumers, A and B. u Their endowments of goods 1 and 2 are u E.g. u The total quantities available and units of good.
Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS 1 EXTERNALITIES.
General Equilibrium Analysis
1 Chapter 3 – Tools of Normative Analysis Public Finance McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
General Equilibrium Theory
General Equilibrium and Efficiency. General Equilibrium Analysis is the study of the simultaneous determination of prices and quantities in all relevant.
Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: General Equilibrium and Economic Efficiency 16 C H A P T E R Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing.
Microeconomics General equilibrium Institute of Economic Theories - University of Miskolc Mónika Kis-Orloczki Assistant lecturer.
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications Chapter 19 General Equilibrium Analysis and Economic Efficiency By Edgar K. Browning & Mark A. Zupan John Wiley.
Neoclassical Revival 1920s and “Empty Economic Boxes” debate Developments in the 1930s –Demand Theory –Theory of Production and Cost –Welfare Economics.
Chapter 7 General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Review Perfect Competition Market.
1 General Equilibrium APEC 3001 Summer 2006 Readings: Chapter 16.
Economic Efficiency and the Competitive Ideal © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
Consumers, Producers, and the Efficiency of Markets Outline:  Positive economics: Allocation of scarce resources using forces of demand and supply  Normative.
UNIT II:Firms & Markets Theory of the Firm Profit Maximization Perfect Competition Review 7/15 MIDTERM 7/6.
PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS
Theorems of Welfare Economics Welfare Economics and Public Goods.
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc Chapter 13 Competitive General Equilibrium.
Equity, Efficiency and Need
Unit 16 – General equilibrium analysis and Economic efficiency.
CHAPTER 30 EXCHANGE.
1 Exchange Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009.
General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency
 General Equilibrium and Welfare.  Partial vs. General equilibrium analysis  Partial Equilibrium: narrow focus  General equilibrium: framework of.
General Equilibrium and the Efficiency of Perfect Competition
Consumer Behavior & Public Policy Lecture #3 Microeconomics.
Overview Efficiency Efficiency and competitive markets Efficiency in exchange Efficiency in production.
1 Theme 1 – The Foundation of Public Economics 11F251 Financial Theory, Policy and Institutions.
1 Intermediate Microeconomic Theory Exchange. What can a market do? We’ve seen that markets are interesting in that if one exists, and someone chooses.
Chapter 16 General Equilibrium, Efficiency, and Equity McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 16 General Equilibrium, Efficiency, and Equity Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
1 Chapters 6 & 19.1 & 19.2: Exchange Efficiency, and Prices.
Market Efficiency SPHA511, John Ries. Market Economies and Perfect Competition Prices are determined by supply and demand Demand represents aggregate.
Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Revisiting the Market Equilibrium Do the equilibrium price and quantity maximize.
Chapter 18W McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Intermediate Microeconomic Theory
CHAPTER 3 Tools of Normative Analysis Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CHAPTER 31 PRODUCTION. The Robinson Crusoe Economy One consumer and one firm; The consumer owns the firm; Preference: over leisure and coconuts; Technology:
General Equilibrium Theory
Tools of Normative Analysis
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications By Edgar K. Browning & Mark A. Zupan John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11 th Edition, Copyright 2012 PowerPoint prepared by.
EC PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS 1 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS Prof.Dr. Y.Kuştepeli.
Slide 1Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Chapter 16 General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency.
Lectures in By Prof. Dr. Younis El Batrik. THE FIELD OF PUBLIC FINANCE Fundamental Economic Facts  The Scarcity of Resources  The necessity of economizing.
CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, AND THE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS
Chapter 5 A Closed-Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model.
CASE FAIR OSTER ECONOMICS P R I N C I P L E S O F
Exchange Chapter 31 Niklas Jakobsson Click to add notes.
General Equilibrium Analysis
TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS
Efficiency and Equity in a Competitive Market
Role of Government* Organic View Mechanistic View Market Failures
Eco 3311 Lecture 12 One Period Closed Economy Model - Equilibrium
Chapter 32 Exchange.
EFFICIENCY, MARKETS, AND GOVERNMENTS
Chapter 3 - Tools of Normative Analysis
Chapter Twenty-Nine Exchange.
CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, AND THE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS
Overview Efficiency Efficiency and competitive markets
Walter Nicholson Christopher Snyder
General Equilibrium (Social Efficiency)
Tools of normative analysis
Presentation transcript:

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS1 TOOLS OF NORMATIVE ANALYSIS

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS2 Welfare economics: Branch of economic theory concerned with the desirability of alternative economic states. Pure exchange economy Edgeworth box Conventionally shaped indifference curves

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS3 A pareto efficient allocation is an allocation in which it is impossible to make someone better off without making anyone else worse off. A Pareto improvement is a reallocation of resources that makes one person better off without making anyone else worse off. The locus of all Pareto efficient points is called the contract curve. For an allocation to be pareto efficient it must a point at which indifference curves of two individuals are barely touching. The indifference curves must be tangent and their slopes equal. MRS(Adam)= MRS(Eve)

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS4 Production Possibilities Curve: shows the maximum quantity of x that can be produced along with any given quantity of y. MRT = MCx/MCy = slope of PPF Pareto efficiency requires MRT = MRS(Adam) = MRS(Eve)

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS5 The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics: As long as 1) producers and consumers act as perfect competitors or price takers, 2) a market exists for each commodity, then under certain conditions a Pareto efficient allocation of resources emerges. (Invisible hand). A basic result from economic theory is that a profit maximizing competitive firm produces output up to the point where MCx/MCy = Px/Py = MRT = MRS(Adam) = MRS(Eve) Competition along with maximizing behavior on part of all individuals leads to an efficient outcome.

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS6 Fairness: If properly functioning competitive markets allocate resources efficiently, what is the role of government in the economy? Its main function would be to establish a setting in which property rights are protected so that competition can work. Utility possibilities curve is derived from the contract curve and it shows the maximum amount of one person’s utility given the other individual’s utility level. All points on or below utility possibilities curve are attainable by society, all points above it are not attainable.

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS7 All points on utility possibilities curve are Pareto efficient but they represent very different distributions of real income between Adam and Eve. To find which is best, a social welfare function which embodies society’s views on the relative deservedness of Adam and Eve must be postulated. A social welfare function is a statement how society’s well-being relates to the well being of its members. The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics indicates that a properly working competitive system leads to some allocation on the utility possibilities curve. There is no reason that it is the particular point that maximizes social welfare.

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS8 Even if the economy generates a Pareto efficient allocation of resources, government intervention may be necessary to achieve “fair” distribution of utility. A second reason why the fundamental theorem need not imply a minimal government is that certain conditions required for its validity may not be satisfied by real world markets. When these conditions are absent, the free market allocation of resources may be inefficient.

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS9 The Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics: society can attain any Pareto efficient allocation of resources by making a suitable assignment of individual endowments and letting people freely trade with each other as in Edgeworth box. By distributing income suitably and then getting out of the way and letting markets work, the government can attain any point on the utility possibilities curve.

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS10 The issues of efficiency and distributional fairness can be separated. If society determines that the current distribution of resources is unfair, without interfering with market prices and impairing efficiency, it needs only transfer resources among people in a way deemed to be fair. Government needs some way to allocate resources and the only way for doing so (taxes) may cause inefficiencies.

Assoc. Prof. Y.KuştepeliECN 242 PUBLIC ECONOMICS11 Market Failure: 1. market power 2. unexistence of markets asymmetric information externality public good The fact that the market generated allocation of resources is imperfect does not mean that government is capable of doing better. In certain cases, the costs of setting up a government agency to deal with externality could exceed the cost of externality itself.