Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Overview of Issues, Options and Recent International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT-SHARING UNDER THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT-SHARING.
Advertisements

ARIPOs Initiative on Traditional knowledge and Access and Benefit Sharing. By F.K MPANJU Patent Examiner (ARIPO) Cape Town 19 th –24 th Nov
Dubai Conference May 2004 Molengraaff Institute Center for Intellectual Property Law (CIER) 2 OVERVIEW Domain Concepts Methodologies Problematic Issues.
Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions WIPO Headquarters Geneva, May 28, 2010.
Documentation and Digitization of Intangible Cultural Heritage: the Experience of WIPO International Conference on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage.
Access to and Use of Traditional Knowledge A view from industry Bo Hammer Jensen.
Intellectual property questions in relation to genetic resources Information meeting on intellectual property and genetic resources Geneva, September 15,
Synergies between IP governance and South –South Cooperation on IP and Development First WIPO Interregional Meeting on South-South Cooperation on IP Governance;
“Learning from Existing Evaluation Practices on the Impacts and Effects of Intellectual Property on Development” Geneva 6th/7th October 2011 Evaluation.
Convention on Biological Diversity, Traditional Knowledge and the TRIPS Agreement Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
The Convention on Biological Diversity, access to genetic resources and IPR Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
Folklore, Traditional Knowledge and Benefit Sharing ATRIP CONGRESS 2003 Tokyo August 4-6, 2003.
Developing National Legislation based on the Pacific Model Law 2002 “Empowering Local Communities: Protection of Indigenous Rights” Knowledge Economy Fostering.
(16 th -17 th November, 2006) Breakaway Session Traditional Knowledge Protection and IPR Issues Mr. V K Gupta Director, NISCAIR, New Delhi & Shri Verghese.
Experiences with implementation of Brazilian A & BS Regime and Suggestions for Reform Juliana Santilli.
Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands Farmers’ Rights – international level concepts and actions Niels Louwaars Biopolicies specialist.
Intellectual Property Strategies For Development: Issues and Challenges WIPO Second Annual Conference on South-South Cooperation on Intellectual Property.
Department of AYUSH and NISCAIR “International Conclave on Traditional Medicine” New Delhi, November 16-17, 2006 Dr. Shakeel Bhatti Head Genetic Resources,
Facilitating South-South Cooperation Using Intellectual Property to Protect Traditional Knowledge, Cultural Expressions and Genetic Resources Manuel Ruiz.
Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage at the crossroads of law, technology and business: a view from WIPO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL.
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
Intangible Cultural Heritage Section
Ole Kr. Fauchald Introduction to biodiversity n What is ”biodiversity”? ä Distinguish between levels of biodiversity ä Development of biodiversity.
Breakaway Session Traditional Knowledge Protection and IPR Issues (17 th November, 2006) Mr. V K Gupta Director, NISCAIR, New Delhi International Conclave.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
The Relationship between TRIPS and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) - State of play in the TRIPS Council - WTO Symposium on Trade and Sustainable.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
FEASIBILITY OF NATIONAL DISCLOSURE OF ORIGIN REQUIREMENTS 21 April 2005 WTO Symposium, Geneva Disclosure Requirements: Incorporating the CBD Principles.
WIPO – Ono Academic College – Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs Traditional Knowledge The Open Questions Dr. Shlomit Yanisky-Ravid Shalom Comparative.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
1 Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources in Economic Partnership Agreements: Elements of a Positive Agenda for ECOWAS Countries ECOWAS Regional Dialogue.
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights FAO Regional Workshop on WTO Accession Damascus, October 2008 Hamish Smith Agriculture and.
The Need to Address Disclosure of Origin Requirements in Patent Law Harmonization Initiatives Joshua D. Sarnoff Washington College of Law American University.
21 April 2005Felix Addor - Disclosure Requirement1 Felix Addor Head of the Swiss Delegation to the WTO/TRIPS-Council Deputy Director General Swiss Federal.
COMBINING ACCESS TO CULTURAL HERITAGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Brussels November 2010 Victor Vazquez Senior Legal Counsellor, Digital Future.
International Dimension of Protection of TK Presentation by India.
P. Pushpangadan & K. Narayanan Nair National Botanical Research Institute (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research) Lucknow – , India ACCESS.
“PERUVIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE” Presentation by Minister Counsellor Betty Berendson, Deputy Permanent Representative of.
Indigenous Knowledge June 2011 Update on WIPO and SA.
CUTS International Capacity Building Training Programme on Advance IPR, WTO-Related Issues and Patent Writing April 28-May 02, 2008, Jaipur TRIPS – Article.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Session 7: IPRs II: How Intellectual Property Rights Can Affect the Daily.
Current trends in EPA negotiations in relation to IPRs Fleur Claessens.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
The Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge Puzzle Wend Wendland, Director, Traditional Knowledge Division.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Day Four 1.To discuss and understand how intellectual property.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
MUN Presentation-Egypt Kwok Wai Yat(5) Lai Kin Ho(6)
Selected Contemporary Issues in Field of Patents WIPO-UKRAINE SUMMER SCHOOL ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – JULY 2011.
The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and The Convention on Biological Diversity Training Workshop The International.
International Protection of Traditional Wisdom on Bio-diversity and Sacred Landscapes Lyndel V. Prott and Patrick.J. O’Keefe.
ICH Intangible Cultural Heritage Keywords Cécile Duvelle Chief, Intangible Cultural Heritage Section Secretary of the 2003 Convention UNESCO Capacity-building.
Law and Policy of Relevance for the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Session 6 To discuss the meaning of sui generis protection.
1 Protection of Traditional Knowledges (TKs) – Sui Generis Ann Marie Chischilly Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals Northern Arizona University.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
Exploring BIODIVERSITY, AGRICULTURE and CLIMATE CHANGE in NATIONAL LAWS affecting LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Ambra Gobena, Esq.
The (Elusive?) Quest for Coherence in Global Negotiations and Norms: The Case of TRIPS and CBD WTO Public Forum 17 Sept Martin Girsberger Swiss Federal.
Designing a Dynamic IP System in the Republic of Belarus
World Heritage List Procedure for inscription
Latest Developments at WIPO
وضع المفاوضات حول الملكية الفكرية في محافل متعددة الأطراف
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
The Global Landscape of IP/TK
1999 MOSAICC 2001 CBD BONN GUIDELINES
The Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge Puzzle
Introduction to IP, TK and TCEs
Presentation transcript:

Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Overview of Issues, Options and Recent International Developments Wend Wendland, Director, Traditional Knowledge Division, WIPO

Outline Update on Negotiations at WIPO Issues Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Genetic Resources Options at the National Level

Update on Negotiations at WIPO

Text-based negotiations with the objective of reaching agreement on a text(s) of an international legal instrument(s) which will ensure the effective protection of genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions WIPO Intergovernmental Committee

Diverse stakeholders, diverse objectives International coherence: fragmentation of international norm-setting Top-down or bottom up: minimal successful national experience Participation: challenges to inclusivity Challenges... Legislative approach: interface with practical mechanisms

Historical opportunity: first developing country-led IP normative process Cutting edge: fresh uses for age-old IP values and principles Narrowing the trust-gap: growing confidence in the process International comity: IP and mutual supportiveness Opportunities...

Traditional knowledge: draft sui generis instrument Traditional cultural expressions: draft sui generis instrument Genetic resources: consolidated document comprising objectives, principles and optional mechanisms

Program IGC 19 July 2011 WIPO GA September 2011 IGC 20 February 14 – 22, 2012 IGC 21 TK April 16-20, 2012 IGC 22 TCEs July 9-13, 2012 GA September 2012

Issues: Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions

Traditional knowledge (TK), traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) and genetic resources (GRs) are valuable and important They are under threat, however Therefore, Indigenous Peoples, local communities and many States call for the greater recognition, protection, safeguarding, preservation and promotion of TK, TCEs and GRs

Innovations and creations based on TK and TCEs are generally patentable and copyrightable ‘Underlying’ TK and TCEs are ‘public domain’ (unprotected) Basic question: Should underlying TK and TCEs – which ‘belong’ to indigenous and local communities - be ‘protected’ in an IP sense? and, if so, what does ‘protected’ mean and what options are there?

“Intellectual property” – creations and innovations of the human mind Intellectual property “protection” – provides creators and innovators with possibility to manage access to and use of their works, if they so wish Proprietary (e.g. exclusive rights) and non-proprietary rights (e.g. moral rights, right to compensation) Balance and proportionality: IP rights do not provide perfect control: limitations and exceptions/the public domain IP “protection” is not equivalent to “preservation/safeguarding” The world of IP is in transformation – e.g. a2k movement “Intellectual property protection”. 1

“Intellectual property protection”. 2 “ A song or story is not a commodity or a form of property but one of the manifestations of an ancient and continuing relationship between people and their territory ” (Daes, 1995)

What do we mean by “protection” of TK/TCEs? Positive protection (an IP right in TK/TCEs, to authorize or prevent use) Defensive protection (avoidance of IP rights in TK/TCEs – e.g.., TKDL; USA’s Native American Insignia Database) “Intellectual property protection”. 3

“Intellectual property protection”. 4 Prevention of access and use without prior and informed consent [exclusive rights model] and/or Acknowledgement of source. Prevention against derogatory use. No passing off [moral rights/unfair competition model], and/or Benefit-sharing/compensation? [access and benefit- sharing/compensatory liability models]

Draft text on traditional knowledge (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/21/4) Objectives General guiding principles Substantive articles 1.Subject Matter of Protection 2.Beneficiaries of Protection 3.Scope of Protection 4.Sanctions, Remedies and Exercise of Rights 5.Administration of Rights 6.Exceptions and Limitations 7.Duration of Protection 8.Formalities 9.Transitional Measures 10.Consistency with the General Legal Framework 11.National Treatment and Other Means of Recognizing Foreign Rights and Interests 12.Trans-boundary Cooperation

Some of the key questions Definitional issues What is “traditional” knowledge? Should all TK and TCEs receive protection? Who should be the beneficiaries of new rights in TK and TCEs? Technical issues How would special protection for TK/TCEs interact with protection available under existing IP? How should publicly available TK/TCEs and transboundary (“shared”) TK/TCEs be addressed? What scope of rights strikes the right balance? Which exceptions and limitations might be appropriate? How long should protection last? Operational issues What role, if any, should registration/documentation play in the protection of TK/TCEs? Procedural issues What belongs in an “international instrument” and what should be left to national legislation?

Issues: Genetic resources

IP and genetic resources: what are the issues? Genetic resources are not “intellectual property” – access and benefit-sharing in GRs are dealt with in other conventions and treaties (CBD (+ Nagoya), FAO)

Inventions based on or derived from GRs may be patentable. This raises questions concerning the relationship between patent law and the CBD: ‘defensive protection’ of GRs: prevention of erroneous patents: databases proposal “quality of patent examination” issue tracking compliance with the CBD: proposed mandatory disclosure requirement “support of IP system for CBD” issue

Options at the National Level

Options for protection of TK and TCEs Policy Legal Infrastructure Practical Strategy

Policy and legal questions and options Defining objectives “positive” and “defensive” protection Identifying subject matter Owners and beneficiaries Defining rights and exceptions

Infrastructure registers, inventories and databases institutional issues Practical tools and measures contracts guidelines protocols training and awareness-raising

Sign up for the TK e-Newsletter and Updates END