Genomic selection in animal breeding- A promising future for faster genetic improvement in livestock Dr Indrasen Chauhan Scientist, CSWRI, Avikanagar Tonk-304501.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliable genomic evaluations across breeds and borders Sander de Roos CRV, the Netherlands.
Advertisements

Coming soon to a genetics lab near you! NBCEC Beef Genetic Workshop Clay Center, NE March 27, 2004 Marker adjusted EPDs.
Genomic Tools for Oat Improvement
Added value of whole-genome sequence data to genomic predictions in dairy cattle Rianne van Binsbergen 1,2, Mario Calus 1, Chris Schrooten 3, Fred van.
Perspectives from Human Studies and Low Density Chip Jeffrey R. O’Connell University of Maryland School of Medicine October 28, 2008.
Classification. Classification  GROUPING things according to their CHARACTERISTICS.
Archaeo(zoo)logy and taxonomy Roel Lauwerier National Service for Archaeology, Cultural Landscape and Built Heritage (RACM) Workshop Users of taxonomic.
Fokkerij in genomics tijdperk Johan van Arendonk Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre Wageningen University.
Computer Simulation in Plant Breeding Introduction Outline Application I: Breeding Method Application II: Gene Mapping Application III: Genetic Modeling.
Latin (Scientific) Adjectives
Abstract The goal of the Conifer Translational Genomics Network (CTGN) project is to provide tree breeders across the United States with new tools to enhance.
Use of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) in Dairy Sire Selection Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Biology and Bioinformatics Gabor T. Marth Department of Biology, Boston College BI820 – Seminar in Quantitative and Computational Problems.
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
Computational Complexity The complexity of the MG model for a single SNP is determined by the complexity of the matrix operations in formulas used to iteratively.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
What’s coming next in genomics? Ben Hayes, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, Australia.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Georgetown Ag Systems.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
2002 Curt Van Tassell Gene Evaluation and Mapping Laboratory and Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Chuanyu Sun Paul VanRaden National Association of Animal breeders, USA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USA Increasing long term response by selecting.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
ARC Biotechnology Platform: Sequencing for Game Genomics Dr Jasper Rees
Marker Assisted Selection Biotechnology in Action.
Animal Genetics. Natural Selection n an organisms ability to SURVIVE and pass on its GENETIC information to its offspring.
An Efficient Method of Generating Whole Genome Sequence for Thousands of Bulls Chuanyu Sun 1 and Paul M. VanRaden 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders,
Genome mapping and sequencing is the core of structural genomics. While no whole genome draft sequences are yet available with aquaculture species, genomes.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
2007 Paul VanRaden and Mel Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.
Dr. Scott Sebastian, Research Fellow, Pioneer Hi-Bred International Plant Breeding Seminar at University of California Davis Accelerated Yield.
Experimental Design and Data Structure Supplement to Lecture 8 Fall
Jeff O’ConnellInterbull annual meeting, Orlando, FL, July 2015 (1) J. R. O’Connell 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 University of Maryland School of Medicine,
QTL Associated with Maize Kernel Traits among Illinois High Oil × B73 Backcross-Derived Lines By J.J. Wassom, J.C. Wong, and T.R. Rocheford University.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
Host disease genetics: bovine tuberculosis resistance in
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
April 2010 (1) Prediction of Breed Composition & Multibreed Genomic Evaluations K. M. Olson and P. M. VanRaden.
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding April 27, 2010 Interpretation of genomic breeding values from a unified, one-step national evaluation Research project.
1 Agenda Introduction Functional traits Genomics to system biology in animal science OMICS for analyzing diseases in livestock species Genomics Transcriptomics.
Population Genetics & Animal Breeding
A Quantitative Overview to Gene Expression Profiling in Animal Genetics Armidale Animal Breeding Summer Course, UNE, Feb Final Remarks Genetical.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
Advanced Animal Breeding
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Application of Genetic Markers to Dairy Cattle. Overview Traditional selection Genetic markers Granddaughter design Resource populations QTL identification.
MASTITIS RESISTANCE New breeding tools for improving mastitis resistance in European dairy cattle QLK5-CT
Ø Novel approaches for linkage mapping in dairy cattle
Classifying Animals.
Possibilities and requirements for organic dairy breeding lines
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
The effect of using sequence data instead of a lower density SNP chip on a GWAS EAAP 2017; Tallinn, Estonia Sanne van den Berg, Roel Veerkamp, Fred van.
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Using Haplotypes in Breeding Programs
M-H Pinard-van der Laan
Precision animal breeding
The Basic Genetic Model
Variación no-aditiva y selección genómica
Presentation transcript:

Genomic selection in animal breeding- A promising future for faster genetic improvement in livestock Dr Indrasen Chauhan Scientist, CSWRI, Avikanagar Tonk-304501

Conventional selection – Based on individual records, pedigree or progeny performance or family performance. SI=WT9 +1DMY90

Progeny testing –Bulls evaluated on the basis of daughters performance http://www.nddb.org/ndpi/English/AboutNDPI/Manuals-Guidelines/PDFDocuments/PIP-Vol-IV-A-Manual-on-Progeny-Testing.pdf

History of Genomics 1911-The gene map of Drosphila by Alfred Sturtevant. 1930s-Molecular Biology begins. 1965-Margaret Dayhoff's Atlas of Protein Sequences 1970-Sequencing techniques by Fredirick Sanger Three disciplines Genetics, Molecular biology and Bioinformatics converged in 1980s and 1990s -Genomics

In the 1990s starts QTL analysis in in farm animals

Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) 1-Detect one or several QTLs 2-Fine mapping 3-Find the gene responsible 4-Introgression

Limitations of MAS 1-The effect of individual Quantitative trait loci (QTL) on polygenic traits, such as milk yield, are likely to be small 2-Number of QTL required is quite large to sufficiently explain the genetic variation in these traits

Genomic Breeding In 1990 Human Genome project started and in 2003 human genome was published. This was followed by sequencing of farm animal genomes Species Year Dog (Canis Familiaris) 2003 Chicken (Gallus Gallus) 2004 Cat (Felis sylvestris) 2006 Sheep (Ovis Aries) 2008 Cattle (Bos taurus) 2009 Horse (Equus caballus) Pig (Sus Scrofa)

Sequencing revolutionised development of large panels of SNPs in domestic animals Genomic Selection was actually first introduced by Haley and Visscher at Armidale WCGALP in 1998 But the methodology for Genomic Selection was first presented by Meuwissen et. al.in 2001

Genomic Breeding Two step process: “Genomic Selection is defined as a technology for increasing the accuracy with which the genetic merit of young potential breeding animals can be determined". Wickham et al. ,2012 Two step process: Estimate the effects of markers in a reference (training) populations (phenotyped and genotyped) This information utilized to predict the breeding value of candidates to selection in a testing (evaluation) population (genotyped)

Methodology Eggen,2012

Differences with MAS MAS concentrates on few QTLs having association with markers Genomic selection uses a genome-wide panel of dense markers

Advantages Animals at an early age because breeding values can be predicted with an accuracy of 0.8 for selection candidates at birth

Higher rate of gain as compared to Progeny testing

Lower rate of Inbreeding per generation

Genomic selection for future uses: -Mitigation of effects of climatic change-select for lower GHG (green-house gas) emissions in species: "Eco friendly cattle”(Hayes et. al. , 2013) Genomic selection is especially useful for Traits with low heritability(fitness traits) Traits difficult/expensive to measure(like wool quality in sheep Disease susceptibility/resistance traits Traits that take a lifetime to measure(longevity)

High-density SNP Chips available for Cattle Sheep Goat Pigs Horses Dogs Chicken Salmon Human

Countries following Genomic Selection USA & Canada (In Collaboration) New Zealand Netherlands Australia Denmark & Sweden Brazil

Limitations Genotyping requires sufficiently large set of animals for accurate marker estimates For Low heritable traits more records are needed Between breed accuracy low-High Density chip Marker estimates must be estimated in population where they have to be used

Thank you