Daniel Boedeker, MD Spinal Hardware Extraction
Spinal instrumentation has been utilized since the 1940s Pedicle screws became increasingly popular in the 1980s with both plate and rod versions Despite legal turmoil in the early 1990s they have ultimately been found to be a safe and effective means of stabilizing the posterior spine and attaining fusion Pedicle Screws
Purpose of pedicle screws is to limit motion and enhance successful fusion Most studies show improved outcomes with complete fusion, usually determined radiographically Typically follow fusion patients for several months post operatively with periodic x-rays Pedicle Screws
Problem is that radiographic determination of fusion is difficult 30 – 40% of the time the radiographic interpretation was found to be wrong at surgery Pedicle Screws
Persistent back pain is the most common complaint following spinal fusion Incidence in literature is highly variable with studies showing % Many factors can result in post fusion back pain Lumbar Fusion
Among the causes of post fusion back pain can be: Pseudoarthrosis Malpositioned hardware Adjacent segment disease SI joint pain Painful hardware Lumbar Fusion
Continued pain after reasonable time and adequate rehab bears further investigation Depending on nature of the pain testing such as CT scanning is appropriate CT allows for 3 dimensional evaluation of hardware position as well as quality of the fusion Even CT can be misinterpreted with regard to quality of fusion Persistent Pain
Tenderness to palpation over hardware can be indicative of painful hardware Best test is hardware block though this is not perfect These two findings are the most predictive of improvement in pain after hardware extraction Both rely on subjective report from patient Persistent Pain
There are no prospective studies evaluating the benefit of spinal hardware extraction Several retrospective studies show statistically significant improvement in pain and functional status after hardware removal Hardware Extraction
Biomechanical studies show removal of hardware decreases stress on adjacent disks, potentially limiting adjacent segment disease Increasing flexibility after hardware removal may decrease stress shielding effects at adjacent levels Hardware Extraction
Aside from pain there are other potential reasons to extract hardware Some thought that previous infection is an indication for hardware removal after successful fusion is achieved Allergy to metal alloy is rare but reported issue that may necessitate extraction Manufacturers routinely recommend extraction for all hardware Hardware Extraction
In some long construct fusions, such as thoracolumbar trauma, extraction has been associated with progressive deformity Hardware Extraction
Hardware Injection Pain After Fusion Tender to Palpation Infection Not Tender CTCT / Myelogram SI injection Exploration Extraction / Revision No Action
Summary Persistent back pain after instrumented fusion is multifactorial Among the causes of post fusion pain is symptomatic hardware No strong data exists to give guidance with regard to hardware removal Undoubtedly helpful in some patients, but not all