CRASH IMMINENT SAFETY: A TIER 1 UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER PROFESSOR UMIT OZGUNER TRC INC. CHAIR ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proactive Traffic Merging Strategies for Sensor-Enabled Cars
Advertisements

ESafety 8 July e-Safety Working Group Brussels 8 July 2002 Sub-group 1: Autonomous In-vehicle Technologies.
Privacy By Design Sample Use Case
Focused Activity areas Better Mobility Road Safety Environment Impact Ass. & HMI Traveler Information Road Pricing V2I / ISA Cooperative Green Car Transit.
Response, Emergency Staging, Communications, Uniform Management, and Evacuation (R.E.S.C.U.M.E.) NWTC Session 2C: Incident Management Kevin Dopart, Noblis.
Driver Behavior Models NSF DriveSense Workshop Norfolk, VA Oct Mario Gerla UCLA, Computer Science Dept.
© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
1 IntelliDrive SM IntelliDrive SM for Transit 101 ITS America Annual Meeting May 4, 2010 Jeffrey L. Spencer FTA.
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
1 Challenge the future The Dutch Automated Vehicle Initiative: Challenges for automated driving Dr. R.(Raymond) G. Hoogendoorn Assistant Professor Delft.
Perception and Communications for Vulnerable Road Users safety Pierre Merdrignac Supervisors: Fawzi Nashashibi, Evangeline Pollard, Oyunchimeg Shagdar.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005) 939–953 Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a.
overview Motivation Ongoing research on VANETs Introduction Objectives Applications Possible attacks Conclusion.
TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 TRANSPORT MODELLING Lecture 4 26-Sep-08 Transport Modelling Microsimulation Software.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Human Factors Research Issues for Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems (CICAS) Vicki Neale, Ph.D. Director, Center for Vehicle-Infrastructure.
AUTOMOBILES Dimitris Milakis, Transport Institute, Delft University of Technology Envisioning Automated Vehicles within the Built Environment: 2020, 2035,
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Overview of SAFER.
Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium University Transportation Center For Region 10 PacTrans Safety Research and Education Overviews Universities.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Caitlin Motsinger ● Sure Program ● Summer 2007 Advisor: Dr. Todd Hubing ● Graduate Student Assistant: Robert Clippard Clemson University ● Clemson, South.
Human Interaction with Intelligent Transportation Systems Committee Meeting 3 – August 24, 2011.
ITS America – April 2004 The Naturalistic Driving Study: Why are Crashes Occurring? Suzie Lee Research Scientist, Center for Crash Causation and Human.
Learning HMM-based cognitive load models for supporting human-agent teamwork Xiaocong Fan, Po-Chun Chen, John Yen 소프트컴퓨팅연구실황주원.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Bringing intelligent systems to the market: the new European research challenge of Field Operational Tests Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector ICT for Transport.
Transportation Active Safety Institute TASI: Our Focus on the Human Machine Interface 25 January 2007 Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, IUPUI.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
Wireless traffic service platform for combined vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications Authors : T. Sukuvaara and P. Nurmi IEEE.
Connectivity & Mobility
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
Smart Cars + Smart Roads Safety, Mobility, Telematics and Operations ITS Oregon Annual Meeting February 1 st, 2005 Jim Wright, American Association Of.
1 TRB Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program University of California, Berkeley Jane Lappin Volpe National.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
Connected Vehicle Program – Dynamic Mobility Applications Highlights for Tech Scan Scrum.
DRIVE Net: An E-Science Transportation Platform for Big Data, Big Discoveries, and Big Decisions PacTrans STAR Lab University of Washington July 17, 2015.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Benchtesting Driver Support and Collision Avoidance Systems using Naturalistic Driving Data Shane McLaughlin March 17, 2011.
Attention Grounding: A New Approach to IVIS Implementation Emily Wiese Cognitive Systems Lab Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University.
Integrating Trust and Driver’s Safety By Robin Mitchell.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
SAFENET The OSU SAFENET Project The Ohio State University Center for Automotive Research & Center for Intelligent Transportation Research.
Research Elements of Integrated Vehicle Based Safety Systems Jack Ference, IVBSS Technical Manager ITS America Annual Meeting May, 2005.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
John Harding ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting
Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium.
Driver-Vehicle Interface Design Principles Chris Monk September 24, 2013.
1 VII CONSORTIUM VIIC Update Walton Fehr Boulder, CO June 21, 2006.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
Digital Highway Measurement System Qatar Ministry of Transportation August 15, 2007 Dr. Kunik Lee Chief Safety Scientist, Office of Safety R&D TFHRC, FHWA,
Transport Research Arena Ljubljana 2008 Strategic Session 9:2 "Integrated Transport Safety" Cooperative systems for a safe and efficient mobility SMART.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Center for Networked Computing. Motivation Model and problem formulation Theoretical analysis The idea of the proposed algorithm Performance evaluations.
Traffic Records Forum 2016 August 9, 2016 Kelvin R. Santiago-Chaparro
Crash-imminent safety (CrIS) UTC
On-board Technologies
SAE DSRC Technical Committee work and outlook
Overview of CV2X Requirements
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
On-board Technologies
Developing Vehicular Data Cloud Services in the IoT Environment
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
Lead Researcher: Keith Redmill
Presentation transcript:

CRASH IMMINENT SAFETY: A TIER 1 UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER PROFESSOR UMIT OZGUNER TRC INC. CHAIR ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR, CRASH IMMINENT SAFETY UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER March 19, 2015

Each Project has a Lead Investigator and researchers from multiple Universities.

All are simulators from the same company, although some are “table-top” models. All are running the same software. OSU-1 has moveable base, back rear screen etc. Some connections established and still under test. Research also underway on synchronization issues OSU - 1 UMass UW IUPUI OSU - 2 PROJECT #1: NETWORKED DRIVING SIMULATORS

 Create computational models for human behavior in pre-crash scenarios.  Utilize dynamic inputs about the changing situation and behavior of others.  Use mathematical or symbolic processing to carry out the functions required to simulate the perception, attention, cognition, and control behavior of interest.  Integrate different component models, including control theory models, decision and judgment models, learning classifier systems, joint human-automation system models, and attention models.  Assist with making predictions in pre-crash situations and quantitative estimates of hypothesized safety improvements.

Accomplishments Vehicle time series data extraction and collection from naturalistic driving data sets Driver behavior classification and dangerous behavior detection based on Hidden Markov Models Vehicle lane change trajectory prediction considering driver behavior Vehicle convoy configuration and lane changing modeling with different driving behavior Predictive controller design optimizing objective function based on vehicle headway set Experiments and comparisons of the behavior-sensible controller with a conservative controller

Accomplishments Control and Intelligent Transportation Research Lab Vehicle time series data extraction and collection from naturalistic driving data sets Driver behavior classification and dangerous behavior detection based on Hidden Markov Models Vehicle lane change trajectory prediction considering driver behavior Develop optimization methods that could improve the HMM training process [3] Analyze and extract decisive driving features for dangerous driving behavior detection Test and verify controller performance for crash imminent scenarios using simulator

 Understand how drivers respond to vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) information cues in pre-crash scenarios.  Understand driver engagement over a range of human physiological and behavioral factors, including age and drowsiness.  Consider how to re-engage a driver who may be partially or completely disengaged from key attention elements while operating a semi-autonomous vehicle. Project 3: COGNITIVE ATTENTION MODELING 9

Cognitive Attention Models for Driver Engagement in Intelligent and Semi-autonomous Vehicles Driver Attention and Engagement

Model-based re-engagement and control coordination Algorithms assess anomalies and risk at multiple temporal and spatial scales Re-engagement at multiple timescales –Alerting/warning –Redirecting driver attention to developing risk –Directing the driver to take charge of some control functions –Reconfiguring automated subsystems –Communicating authority and capacity—clearly demarking intended use Concept development and evaluation in the simulator Driver model development in parallel to complement Project 2

Semi-autonomous Vehicles: Two cases Case 1: Alternating glances inside and outside vehicle Case 2: Transfer of control

Minimum alerting time –Time spent and activities pursued inside the vehicle since the last glance up on the forward roadway –Situation awareness when driver is asked to take over control (John Lee) –Speed, traffic conditions, weather, and roadway conditions when drivers is asked to take over (David Woods) Next research questions –What is minimum alerting time –How does it vary as a function of different levels of situation awareness –How does it vary as a function of different factors in the environment. Minimum alerting time and next research questions

ON DEMAND AUTOMATED SHUTTLES Control and Intelligent Transportation Research Lab On demand automated shuttles can be used for the first or last mile of mobility or for mobility within a selected zone. Connected Vehicle technology (intersection safety, cooperative driving) has to be utilized for optimum results. Some Road-Side Units for communication may need to be installed. The shuttles are slow but move among dense pedestrian environments and present many “Crash Imminent” situations

Different types of vehicles are being considered Top vehicles can have “safety monitors” on board. Commercially developed vehicle. Control and Intelligent Transportation Research Lab OSU-CAR vehicles

CONTACTS car.osu.edu Umit Ozguner Director, Crash Imminent Safety University Transportation Center TRC Inc. Chair on Intelligent Transportation Systems citr.osu.edu Marilyn Roberts Program Manager