Risk-Limiting Dispatch for Power Networks David Tse, Berkeley Ram Rajagopal (Stanford) Baosen Zhang (Berkeley)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aidan Tuohy Sr. Project Engineer NWPCC Flexibility Metric Roundtable April 2013 Metrics and Methods to Assess Power System Flexibility.
Advertisements

Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University
Model-predictive Cascade Mitigation of Electric Power Systems with Energy Storage and Renewable Generation Mads R. Almassalkhi and Ian A. Hiskens Department.
Consideration of Price Caps Reduction Meeting of the Board of Governors of the California ISO By David Parquet Vice President Enron North America Corp.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Secure System Scheduling with High Wind Penetrations J. Kennedy March 2009.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Javad Lavaei Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University Various Techniques for Nonlinear Energy-Related Optimizations.
Multi-Area Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network Shmuel Oren University of California, Berkeley Joint.
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO Independent Energy Producers 2011 Annual Meeting - October 5, 2011 Stanford Sierra Conference.
Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee March 24, 2015
LoCal: Rethinking the Energy Infrastructure using Internet Design Principles David Culler University of California, Berkeley Renewable Energy Microgrid.
International Financial Networks and Global Supply Chains Jose Cruz Presentation at MKIDS Mini-Workshop September 10, 2003 Virtual Center for Supernetworks.
Statics and Dynamics of Complex Network Systems: Supply Chain Analysis and Financial Networks with Intermediation Ke MKIDS Mini-Workshop September 10,
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
A R EVIEW OF L ARGE -S CALE R ENEWABLE E LECTRICITY I NTEGRATION S TUDIES Paulina Jaramillo, Carnegie Mellon University And Paul Hines, University of Vermont.
Javad Lavaei Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University Optimization over Graph with Application to Power Systems.
Low-Rank Solution of Convex Relaxation for Optimal Power Flow Problem
Javad Lavaei Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University Joint work with Somayeh Sojoudi Convexification of Optimal Power Flow Problem by.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION AND CONTROL FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT Nicolas Gast Joint work with Jean-Yves Le Boudec, Dan-Cristian Tomozei March
Campus da FEUP Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto Portugal T F © 2009 Integração.
Energy procurement in the presence of intermittent sources Jayakrishnan Nair (CWI) Sachin Adlakha (Caltech) Adam Wierman (Caltech)
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
1 Pravin Varaiya Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, UC Berkeley Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong UST Selling Wind Randomly Research supported.
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
Load Management Strategies to Support Grid Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Paulina Jaramillo and Lester Lave.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Cork June Dynamic modelling of transmission systems: costs of seasonal-zonal transmission loss factor charging and the impact of large-scale offshore.
Smart Capacity Markets: Can they be Smart Enough? Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Smart Capacity.
Pj Overview of Wind Energy Grid Integration in Australia ADB Wind Energy Grid Integration Workshop Sept 23, 2013 Dr Geoff James Specialist, Renewable Energy.
Effects of Panel Orientation on Solar Integration into Electric Grids by M. Doroshenko ISS4E Lab, University of Waterloo
Federal Electricity Regulation and Alternative Energy: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Presented by Scott M. Harvey Prepared for American Bar Association.
Energy procurement in the presence of intermittent sources Adam Wierman (Caltech) JK Nair (Caltech / CWI) Sachin Adlakha (Caltech)
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
©2005 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2004 Joseph E. Bowring Market Monitor FERC Briefing April 13, 2005.
Javad Lavaei Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University Convex Relaxation for Polynomial Optimization: Application to Power Systems and Decentralized.
1 Wind Energy and Electricity Markets Ross Baldick Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin June 8, 2009.
Optimal Placement of Energy Storage in Power Networks Christos Thrampoulidis Subhonmesh Bose and Babak Hassibi Joint work with 52 nd IEEE CDC December.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
John Norden, Manager, Renewable Resource Integration ISO New England Inc NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Roadmap to Renewable Integration in.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
Using Storage To Control Uncertainty in Power Systems Glyn Eggar Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics Heriot-Watt University Energy Systems.
IRP Review  IRPs with Significant Detail on Flexibility Assessment  Portland General Electric  Puget Sound Energy  Other IRPs.
Announcements Homework 8 is 11.19, 11.21, 11.26, 11.27, due now
Highlights of Midwest ISO: 2004 State of the Market Report and Day-2 Energy Markets Prepared by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Midwest.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
Smart Grid Vision: Vision for a Holistic Power Supply and Delivery Chain Stephen Lee Senior Technical Executive Power Delivery & Utilization November 2008.
| Vasilis Zois USC 1. |  Dynamic and sophisticated demand control – Direct control over household appliances  Curtailment Reasons – Reactive Curtailment.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Wind Management at MISO
Erik Ela, Eamonn Lannoye, Bob Entriken, Aidan Tuohy
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
APEx Conference 2016 October 12-14, Medellin Panel 1 – Value of Markets and Future Development Presenter: Restricted.
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
EU-IPA12/CS02 Development of the Renewable Energy Sector
What is the Value of an IBM Balanced Warehouse™
Impact of Wind Farms Aggregation on Large System Scheduling Cost Under Frequency Linked Deviation Settlement Mechanism Presented by Anoop Singh Authored.
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

Risk-Limiting Dispatch for Power Networks David Tse, Berkeley Ram Rajagopal (Stanford) Baosen Zhang (Berkeley)

Motivation Traditional power generators slow to ramp up and down. Have to be dispatched in advance based on predicted demand. Increased penetration of renewables comes increased uncertainty. Questions: How to do dispatch in face of uncertainty? How to quantify the impact of uncertainty? How to hedge against risks from randomness? 1/15

Add 25% wind, 20% error Total Error~2+5=7% Motivation 2/15 Forecasted load Error Reserve Forecasted net demand Error Reserve 1% is about $50 Million/yr (for CAISO) $1 Billion $300 Million

Notation Three types of devices in the power system: 3/15 Generators: Controllable Renewables: Random, High Uncertainty Loads: Random, Low Uncertainty Prediction Error Gaussian in this talk

Two-Stage Formulation Two-stage problem Dynamic programming problem: numerical solution possible but offers little qualitative insight. Make small ¾ assumption. 4/15 Stage 1 (day ahead) Stage 2 (real-time) Set fast generators

Nominal Problem 5/15 Stage 1 Stage 2 Nominal Problem Stage 1 Stage 2 optimal under small ¾ assumption

Impact of uncertainty 6/15

Nominally Uncongested Network Networks are lightly congested Result: 7/15 New England ISO Nominally Uncongested Single Bus Network Price of uncertainty

Single-bus network No congestion => single bus network Easy to get the optimal control 8/15 ~$100 Million/yr optimal

Price of Uncertainty 9/15 0 renewable>loadrenewable<load

Nominally Congested Network One nominally congested line 10/15 Midwest ISO ?

Dimensionality Reduction One congested line Single bus? Result: Reduction to an equivalent two- bus network always possible. 11/15 IEEE 13 Bus Network KVL x x

Two-bus network: Further reduction? Nominally congested line from 1 to 2 Congestion is nominal Errors still average 12/15 ? 1 2 x 1 2 Two isolated buses? x 1 2 Supply > expected Supply < expected Real-time Nominal x Back-flow

Nominal solution regions 13/15 x

Prices of uncertainty 14/15 x

Conclusion Management of risk in the presence of renewables Price of uncertainty –Intrinsic impact of uncertainties Dimension reduction for congested networks 15/15