Drainage and Fish Habitat Prepared by Jennifer Lamoureux, Aquatic and Fish Habitat Biologist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pennsylvania Fish Species 160 Native to PA Study of fish biology: Ichthyology.
Advertisements

Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
RED DEER RIVER BASIN SE Region Brook Trout Distribution N Saskatchewan Alberta LEGEND Species Present Town or City Red Deer River Red Deer/ Brooks Mgmt.
Biological Response of Two North Central PA Streams After Flood of September 2011 Fred Rogers CWI, Supervisor Dr. Mel Zimmerman Introduction: Within Pennsylvania,
* Winter flooding affect eggs/fry * Summer low flows affect migrating/spawning adults * Higher water temperatures stress all life stages * Increased opportunities.
Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Board Forum April 4, 2011 Lynn Markham Center for Land Use Education, UW-Stevens Point.
Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Baker Lake, NU March 2-14,
Watershed Update, Kahler, ECF, 6/26/2014. The Kahler Challenge.
Compensation Easement with the Municipality as a partner.
Goals Develop models to relate “stream health” to land use change and climate change Parameterize models using data from study sites, past work, and newly.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Importance of Protecting Lake Trout. 250,000 lakes in Ontario 1% of these contain lake trout Central/eastern Ontario has >1/3 of lakes Provincial responsibility.
What are the potential impacts of climate change on fresh water recreational fishing opportunities in the U.S.? Presentation to: Water Ecology and Climate.
Maintaining Watersheds. Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards addressed! HS‐ESS2‐5. Plan and conduct an investigation of the properties of water.
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
Use Attainability Analysis City of Conrad Ann Harrie and Bob Bukantis WQS Section, MT DEQ June 28, 2007.
Britannia Village Flood Control System Information Meeting for Directly Affected Landowners February 5, 2009.
Vulnerability of freshwater fish communities to human mediated impacts Jenni McDermid 1 and David Browne 1,2 1 Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, Peterborough,
A Review of Some Grant-Funded Watershed Projects in Central Illinois: Part II Illinois Lake Management Association Grant Opportunities and Funding Options.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Land Management Framework Project Objective 2 Overview November 22, 2006.
Fish Identification Updated April 2014.
Factors Influencing Riverine Fish Assemblages in Massachusetts Armstrong, D.S., Richards, T.A., and Levin, S.B., 2011, Factors influencing riverine fish.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Stormwater Retrofitting: The Art of Opportunity Prepared by the Center for Watershed Protection.
“Aquatic ecosystem” = critters we expect to change (recover or decline) in response to us 3) Common specialists 1)Rare animals - endangered, rare, edge.
Congaree Swamp Survey Species Diversity and Condition of the Fish Community in the Congaree Swamp National Monument Leo Rose.
FISCAL YEAR Discussion on Mid-Year Budget Adjustment: SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DELTA ACTIVITIES 1 Tom Gau, Interim Director San Joaquin County Department.
Your Help is Requested Chatfield is critical to the future water needs of the Front Range area. Please help by writing letters of support for this project.
Broad Beach Sand & Dune Habitat Restoration Project Broad Beach Revetment Owners August 29, 2015.
Mn Fish by Families  Bowfin Bowfin  Bullhead Catfish Bullhead Catfish  Burbot Burbot  Drum Drum  Freshwater Eel Freshwater Eel  Gar Gar  Goby Goby.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Red Lake Fishery Scott Toshner Senior Fisheries Biologist Inland Waters of Douglas and Bayfield Counties.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Program Marin County Department of Public Works.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
Fish Habitat Enhancement. Fish Habitat Enhancement: Bass Provide near shore cover for young bass Provide near shore cover for young bass –Fell trees into.
Common Minnesota Fish. Walleye Sauger
Fish ID Mr. Goggins Wildlife. Small Mouth Bass Large Mouth Bass Flathead Catfish Yellow Bullhead Blue Catfish Channel Catfish Bluegill Crappie.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
Aquatic Life / Habitat Assessment Project PAR 991 June 30, 2006.
Abandoned Mine Drainage’s Impacts The Impact of AMD to Life in Streams Lessons Prepared by Trout Unlimited With Funds from Pennsylvania Department of Environmental.
Wildlife and Fishery Science What type of pet can you have that doesn’t make any noise?
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Michael Sorge Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
1.  Quick Overview of the History and Need  What is Planned for the Fire Department  What is Planned for the Police Department  Financial Details.
permitting.
Emily Preston Wildlife Biologist And many conservation partners! How Species and Habitats Can Help Your Town Adapt to Climate Change.
Briefing regarding the new State General Stormwater Pollution Control Permit.
Wildlife and Fishery Science
Ontario’s Drainage Legislation
Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing
General Classification
Fish 101 – Biology and Habitat
Kaitlin Hanak and James E. McKenna Jr.
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Discover Life in West Virginia ( )
Sara Eddy Fisheries Protection Program Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Mercury in Fish.
36 CAs across Ontario (mainly in the south)
Drainage 101 – Council Educational Session
Study Update Tailrace Slough Use by Anadromous Salmonids
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
Fish and Deckers Creek…
Fish Identification.
Fishes of Deckers Creek
Characteristics of Coldwater Streams
Lower Nemahbin Lake Association 2018 Annual Meeting WELCOME
Presentation transcript:

Drainage and Fish Habitat Prepared by Jennifer Lamoureux, Aquatic and Fish Habitat Biologist

Drain Types  Municipal Drains – created under the Drainage Act  Private Drains – are ditches or a system of underground tiles that farmers construct on their own property in order to drain their land.  Mutual Agreement Drains – are private drains that have been constructed through an agreement between two or more landowners. The drain is registered on the property title through the Land Registry Office.  Award Drains – were constructed under the Ditches and Watercourses Act. This Act was repealed in 1963, but some award drains still exist.

Municipal Drain Classification System  The Municipal Drain Classification (MDC) System was developed by DFO, Conservation Authorities and other partners to strike a balance between the requirements of the Federal Fisheries Act and the Provincial Drainage Act by streamlining the review and approval process related to impacts of drain maintenance activities on fish habitat.  This has resulted in quicker timelines for Fisheries Act reviews to be completed.  RVCA reviews approximately Municipal Drain cleanouts each year in the watershed.  Typically there is a 10 day turn around between when the CA is notified by the Drainage Superintendent of potential drain maintenance works to when the project is processed.

Municipal Drain Classification Types  There are seven drain types that result from the assessment (Type A, B, C, D, E, F, NR) and each type has varying sensitivities with respect to drain maintenance work.  The following parameters are assessed: flow type (perennial vs. intermittent), temperature (cold, cool, warm water), fish species, and aquatic habitat conditions.

Municipal Drain Classification and Ontario’s Class Authorization System

Municipal Drain Classification Map

Fish Habitat provided in drains  Cover: areas that provide escape from predators, competitors and high flows.  Food: the type and amount of food produced is dependent upon substrate and riparian characteristics of the drain.  Reproduction: fish require appropriate substrate and water quality for successful reproduction.  Migration routes: some fish species travel great distances within a drainage network to spawn and carry out their life processes.

RVCA Field Staff Sampling a Drain

Fish species captured in various RVCA municipal drains  Northern pike  Muskellunge  Smallmouth bass  Largemouth bass  Walleye  Bluegill  Pumpkinseed  White sucker  Black crappie  Rock bass  Creek chub  Common shiner  Golden shiner  Central mudminnow  Blacknose shiner  Brook stickleback  Finescale dace  Spottail shiner  Northern redbelly dace  Fallfish  Fathead minnow  Johnny darter  Longnose dace  Brassy minnow  Mottled sculpin  Tessellated darter  Banded killifish  Blackchin shiner A total of 28 species of fish have been captured in municipal drains in the month of July or August

Spring and Summer Comparison

Drains that have been sampled

Drains that have been sampled ctd

Drain Maintenance Mitigation  Sediment and erosion control measures to protect downstream fish and fish habitat  Timing – if the proposed work can be done while the drain is dry in July or August this minimizes potential sediment releases and avoids harming fish  Avoid working during elevated flows -rain events, storms or seasonal floods  Re-vegetate areas along the banks where they have been disturbed by seeding/planting  No in-water work between March 15 th and June 30 th to protect fish during spawning

Good Examples of Drain Maintenance

Poor Examples of Drain Maintenance

Tools for our Municipalities  In the spring RVCA provides annual updates and mapping to each municipality with Municipal Drains.  We have an agreement with adjacent Conservation Authorities to identify a lead to report to shared municipalities in an effort to be cost effective.  We provide a cover letter, digital and hard copy maps, excel spreadsheet and a GIS shape file of the data to each Municipality.  We offer pre-maintenance meetings on site with the contractor and the Drainage Superintendent to offer site specific mitigation advice.  RVCA also monitors during the maintenance work.

Summary  The MDC system attempts to balance the needs of drainage for agriculture areas while protecting fish habitat that is used by species for cover, food, spawning and nursery habitat.  Similarly, Conservation Ontario is working towards striking a balance between the requirements of the Conservation Authorities Act and the Provincial Drainage Act by streamlining the review and approval process related to impacts of drain maintenance activities on municipal drains.  There was an opportunity for the public to provide comments on this new process on the EBR earlier this year and very few comments were received.  MNR, OFA, DSAO, OMAFRA, CA reps met in May to review the comments and there was consensus on the revisions.  The revisions are going to MNR and OMAFRA for approval with implementation expected in 2013.

Highlights....  Less than 4% of RVCA’s 406 drains require a site specific review  The remaining 96% are quickly processed.  Since 2002 we have received a total of 146 Municipal Drain cleanout requests from our member municipalities and we have approved 145.  These approvals occur within 10 working days.  This program has been a positive example of balancing the needs for agricultural drainage and the aquatic ecosystem.  Other drain types are not covered under this system however the Conservation Authority works to review drain maintenance in a timely manner on those applications.