What is a Just Society? What is Justice?.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
The state of nature and social contract theory
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHERS 101
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Module 15: Social protection and the social contract ILO, 2013.
Philosophy in the Age of Reason
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
Political Philosophy Leading to the U.S. Constitution
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Thomas Hobbes British ( ) Leviathan (1654)
Rights and Responsibilities General Rights. Legal and Moral Rights Legal rights: recognized in law –Vary with place and time –May be too limited or too.
John Locke ( ) An English philosopher of the Enlightenment “Natural rights” philosophy.
Natural Law, Social Contract, and Hobbes & Locke
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Democracy.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Philosopher Review. Who Believes… Humans are by nature social beings Your moral virtues control your character Hint: Plato’s student.
A new way of thinking!!!. King James I The Absolute Monarch.
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Chapter 11 Freedom in a Political and Cultural Context.
Roots of Government. What is Government A government is the formal instrument or vehicle through which policies are made and the business of the state.
Foundation of American Government. Standard SSCG1 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the political philosophies that shaped the development of.
Ideas about Government
Cold War Terms graphics. DEMOCRACY FREEDOM INDIVIDUALISM COLLECTIVISM SOCIALISM CAPITALISM TOTALITARIANISM EQUALITY.
Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, & Baron de Montesquieu
Origins of Western Democratic Liberalism Social 30-2.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Rawls IV: Wrapping-up PHIL Original position, cont. of discussion Exclusion of prejudices while contracting in the OP:  'One excludes the knowledge.
CHAPTER EIGHT: SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Justice Paradox of Justice Small volcanic island has two villages, “South Town” (Pop 300) and “North Village” (Pop 500). Threat of devastating volcanic.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Which is Better? A look into the State of Nature versus the Rule of Law.
Do Now Please get out something to write with I will be passing back your folders so we can put our unit cover sheet inside.
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Historical Background A Brief History Political Though t.
Egalitarian Liberalism: Justice in the Modern State
Political Theorists. Descriptions of Government “The Punishment which the wise suffer who refuse to take part in the government, is to live under the.
Political Landscape Why do we need government? Where did our Founding Father’s get their “enlightened” ideas? American culture today, the changing characteristics.
Rawls & Nozick Liberalism & Libertarianism Warwick Debating Society Training, 11/05/2011.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
SSCG1 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the political philosophies that shaped the development of United States constitutional government. SSCG1.
Philosophy in the Age of Reason Chapter 17, section 1.
John Locke Background on Locke Like Hobbes, affected by the events of the English Civil War. But, Parliamentary supporter. Influenced by reading.
Thomas Hobbes ( )  Natural laws are rational principles of preservation of life.  The first law of nature: seek peace as far as you can and then.
Warm-up: Write your answer to this question In Your Notebook Do you think that people are mostly good with some bad tendencies or inherently bad/greedy?
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.
Read Rawls and Noziks handout Complete questions.
universalizability & reversibility
Unit 3: What is a Just Society?
Principles of Health Care Ethics
THOUGHTS ON POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Locke v Hobbes.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
ON THE ROAD TO DEMOCRACY
Essential Questions Who are the philosophers that influenced out founding fathers? Political philosophy- Machiavelli Political philosophy- Hobbes Political.
Introduction to Ethics
A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z
Hobbes vs. Locke.
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:
More than “nonsense on stilts?”
Social Contract Theory
Presentation transcript:

What is a Just Society? What is Justice?

Distributive Justice – essential questions Is it fair that some people work hard but make little money while others are born rich? Is it fair when people who make important contributions to society gain the same or fewer rewards in life as those who make no contributions at all? If some people have disabilities, through no fault of their own, is it fair that they must bear this burden without help from the rest of society?

Key Question: What is the basis for a just distribution of benefits and burdens in a society? In society, everyone experiences some benefits and some burdens Benefits: consumer goods, access to education, health care, enjoyable work and leisure Burdens: unpleasant work, doing without benefits, taking care of dependents Distributive Justice

How Should Things be Divided? Three main ways to divide (based on distributive justice) 1) Simple Equality (Egalitarianism): Dividing benefits and burdens equally amongst everyone 2) Equity: this takes account of special needs. For example, using tax payers money to build wheel chair ramps 3) Merit (Meritorians): some people deserve more benefits and less burdens.

Egalitarianism This encompasses both simple equality and equity Its argument: people are born into a world not of their own making It is a matter of blind luck that some people have more of the riches or suffer more of the pains Canada vs. Kenya Therefore, distributive justice recommends that we should take active measures to ensure that distributive justice is achieved

Meritorians Meritorians argue against the Egalitarians The argument: some people are born with certain advantages or disadvantages; however, it is the person’s abilities and work that determine whether he or she earns the right to retain the advantages or to overcome the disadvantages Egalitarians agree but argue that whether they are prepared to work hard are also a matter of luck

Equality treating people exactly the same Some philosophers argue that there is a difference between treating people justly and treating them equally. Sometimes it is just to treat people unequally For example, it is just to provide people who are differently-abled with wheel chairs and guide dogs and not to provide others, who do not require these services, with the same assistance.

Plato’s Theory on Distributive Justice Plato designed an ideal society around a theory of justice based on people’s special talents Talents are different from person to person and are natural to them A just society is one in which each office or job is performed by a person who is especially qualified for it People’s positions in society are determined in accord with their special abilities, the rewards of the position are also determined by what is needed to perform that job well For example, if Len (from the cake example) was best suited for manual labour, than he should get the biggest piece of cake as he needs the energy to do his physical work Plato was also anti-democratic. He believed that there were people who should govern countries (based on their special talents) and make decisions for an entire society. This person would be entitled to decide whether the cake should be offered to the table at all

Libertarianism is the political philosophy that holds that individual liberty as the basic moral principle of society It advocates for strict limits to government activity and shares the goal of maximizing individual liberty and political freedom.

Cake Example: If grandma put the cake in front of Simone, she might argue that grandma gave it to her and that she owns it. The others could trade something or buy a piece of the cake from her The cake was originally owned by grandma as she mixed it with her own labour

Natural Law There is a higher moral law than the laws of private property, which require people to use their property to help others Natural law theorists do not reject the idea of private property insist that people have an obligation to help those who are less fortunate and to put their wealth to good use even if this means violating a right to use their private property any way they please

Should there be Private Property? Some philosophers argue that individuals are custodians, not owners, of property It is their responsibility to distribute property justly This egalitarian view point is held by socialists

Is it Natural to Want to Own Things? Libertarians and egalitarians have a basic disagreement about whether it is human nature to want private property Libertarians: think it is natural Egalitarians: think it is not natural. Living in a society where private property is considered important is what makes people want it Read Philosophy in Every day life p. 213 Is it society’s influence or natural instinct to want to own things?

Social Contract Social Contract: the appropriate relationship between individuals and their government. Social contract arguments assert that individuals unite into political societies by a process of mutual consent, agreeing to abide by common rules and accept corresponding duties to protect themselves and one another from violence and other kinds of harm

Locke’s Contract Locke was a libertarian Locke defended the a doctrine that individuals have rights that limit the powers of government Locke welcomed the change that the (British) monarch was losing its ability to rule without input He argued that the main political power in society should be an elected parliament Though, people had rights that neither monarchs or parliaments could violate Life, liberty and private property

Hobbes’ Contract people are mainly interested in preserving their own lives and advancing themselves and people will take whatever means necessary – including killing and threatening others – to do this In a world without government who keep the peace through rules, the result would be “war of all against all” and life would be “nasty, brutish, and short.” Through self-interest, people (who are rational) must give up all of their powers to a state and make a social contract Government would then have the ability to make and enforce rules and social policies

Rawl’s Contract John Rawls believes that rational people would want to live under two general rules First, they would want each person to have as much personal liberty as is compatible with everyone else having the same liberties Second, they would want to ensure that they are not penalized if they find themselves in a disadvantaged position – any unequal treatment of people must work to the advantage of the least advantaged person

Rousseau’s Contract Rousseau argued that inequalities are not natural and are avoidable He believed that the benefits of the world belong to everyone in it “The fruits of the earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody.” Therefore, benefits and burdens should be equal to us all