T HE R ESEARCH U NIVERSITY A DVANTAGE Exploring the Pillars of Undergraduate Engagement: The Disciplines, Research, Civic Engagement, and Co-Curricular.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Advertisements

Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme Rockville High School.
Our Commitment to Student Completion & Success Elizabeth L. Bringsjord Interim Provost and Vice Chancellor University Faculty Senate October 25, 2013.
The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2005 Sylvia Hurtado & John H. Pryor January 26, 2006 Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) Higher.
1 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) UCLA’s Higher Education Research Institute COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) Presentation.
EPS 101 & FYE 101 Northern Arizona University. First Year Seminars... Freshmen Success hinges on:  Developing academic & intellectual competence  Establishing.
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
+ The UC Davis Guardian Professions Program A new opportunity for students seeking an advanced degree May 23, 2013.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Global Awareness and Student Engagement Allison BrckaLorenz Jim Gieser Program presented at the 2011 ASHE Annual Conference in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
Student Success Students Temple College.  Is a self-paced, individualized program based upon a pre-assessment that addresses the specific academic needs.
Student Engagement at the Research University (SERU) at UW: Student Life Student Life Assessment Meeting 02 October 2014 Debbie McGhee.
Why be an econ major (or minor)?. Economics Major and Minor Economics is the study of decision-making and incentives among people, firms and governments.
Presenter: Date: Arizona & Higher Education 2014 and Beyond Dan Anderson Director of Institutional Research October 22, 2014.
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
Creating a Culture of Collaboration: Collecting Community Engagement Data Susan Connery, Director of the Feinstein Community Service Center Christopher.
1 College Student Expectations Questionnaire Presentation by the Office of Assessment Division of Student Affairs Mississippi State University Research.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Grants as Planning Stepping Stones: Strategic Initiatives for Engagement with India at Winston-Salem State University UNC India Summit UNC General Administration.
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Orientation Summer 2013 Academic Expectations Sarah M. Rogis Associate Director, Office of Academic and Career Services.
The University Advisement Center Welcomes you to New Jersey City University.
Inspire a world of good TOUGH ENOUGH ARE YOU TO INSPIRE A WORLD OF GOOD?
BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago BCSSE 2013 Institutional Report Concordia University Chicago Elizabeth Owolabi, Ph.D. Director.
Results from the 2013 Undergraduate Alumni Survey Karen Gil, Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Arts & Sciences Lynn Williford, Assistant Provost,
Education. Go Get It. College for Texans Campaign.
AFCEA/AFA July 23,  There are 35 colleges and universities across the state that are members of the University System of Georgia.  All of them.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
New Faculty Orientation David Fairris, Vice Provost Undergraduate Education.
Fall 2011 Pilot Project Module One Project Introduction and Partners’ Roles and Responsibilities.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
Ivonne Polanco Advisory Kim CAL STATE UNIVERSITY, LOS ANGELES.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Enabling World Ready & Work Ready Graduates
7th Annual SERU Symposium University of Texas, Austin May 2, 2013 GALE S. STUART, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN GREGG E. THOMSON, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
Class will start at the top of the hour! Please turn the volume up on your computer speakers to access the audio feature of this seminar. WELCOME TO CE101.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
University Senate Meeting January 25, General Issues Required to report on 14 Standards, including all the Federal Requirements Core requirements:
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Tzong Chang Office of Undergraduate Admission DePaul University.
High School Redesign in Madison: Some Early Results Results from the Analysis of Graduates Results from 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement.
Education in the USA Camille Williams.
The Student Experience at the Research University: Comparing Boilermakers to Other Research Universities’ Students Maggie Dalrymple PACT Forum, December.
Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Cameron University Adult and Continuing Education Bachelor of Science IDS CIP Code: Program.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
International Students and Education Abroad Gregg Thomson, UC Berkeley CSHE October 10, 2014.
Senior Phase Course Choice Information Evening Monday 8 February 2016 Welcome.
Fall 2010 Program Quality Improvement Report Cameron University Adult and Continuing Education Associate of Science IDS CIP Code: Program.
EDUCATION PLAN C AND GRADUATION PETITION
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
Liberal Education and General Education University 100.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Pace Path to Success: Combining Academic and Real-World Experiences through Purposeful Planning and Mentoring. 9/18/2018.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
The Heart of Student Success
Presentation transcript:

T HE R ESEARCH U NIVERSITY A DVANTAGE Exploring the Pillars of Undergraduate Engagement: The Disciplines, Research, Civic Engagement, and Co-Curricular Life John Douglass (CSHE), Igor Chirikov (HSE) & Gregg Thomson (CSHE )

THE NARROW VIEW Academically Adrift : Recent critique of American higher education: (1) students do not learn enough, (2) the curriculum is not rigorous, (3) students do not spend enough time studying and gaining critical thinking skills The [only] function of higher education is the production of a reasonably skilled labor force Focus on various “efficiency” metrics, e.g., WASC’s new “unit conversion ratio” and undue concern with “administrative bloat.”

THE BROADER VIEW Research university undergraduates have opportunities for multiple forms of engagement and learning The purpose of American higher education should be to produce graduates equipped for both careers and participation as citizens in our democracy Our research agenda for SERU both can and should embrace this broader view; we have, in other words, the opportunity to assess the multiple “pillars” of undergraduate engagement

T HE P ILLARS OF E NGAGEMENT Academic engagement and the crucial role of the disciplines in the shape and form of this engagement Research engagement: the extent of research experience Civic engagement and community service outside of the classroom Co-curricular activity and leadership and the learning associated with this

SELECTED VARIABLES FROM SERU 1. Field of study (defined as two-digit CIP codes) 2. Type of career aspiration 3. Gender 4. Race/Ethnicity (including International) 5. Family income (including Independent category) 6. Parental education 7. Immigrant generation 8. Cumulative college GPA 9. Paid employment (hours) 10. Entry/Level status (Lower Division, Upper Division, Transfer) 11. HS GPA; SAT scores

SOME EXPLORATORY RESEARCH Brown, C. & Stuart, G. (2012). The University of Texas at Austin and the Research University Advantage. Division of Student Affairs, University of Texas. Thomson, G. & Cantwell, A. (2012). Academically secure? Undergraduates with High Levels of Academic Engagement, Civic Engagement, and Co-Curricular Leadership. 6 th Annual SERU Symposium, University of California, Berkeley. Stuart, G. and Thomson, G. (2013). Adrift or engaged? What the SERU data tells us. 7 th Annual SERU Symposium, University of Texas, Austin. Brint, S. and Cantwell, A. (2014). Co-curricular study. Fall 2014 SERU Business Meeting and Colloquium, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.

E NGAGEMENT M EASURES (S TUART & T HOMSON, 2013 ) Academic Time The sum of hours per week in class and hours per week studying. High engagement defined as 41 hours per week or more. Academic Engagement Seven items measuring frequency of classroom and instructor interaction. High engagement defined as as “Often” or “Very often” on at least five of the items. Research Engagement Three items indicating experience assisting faculty with research for credit, for pay, or as a volunteer, respectively. High engagement defined as “yes” for at least two of these plus of those with one of these who had also taken a research seminar and/or student research course. Co-Curricular Leadership Leader or officer for at least one of ten types of campus organizations. High engagement defined as leader or officer plus at least 6-10 hours per week in student organization activity. Community and Civic Engagement Participation in community service activity this academic year. High engagement defined as at least 6-10 hours per week or at least hours total type in community service or related activity.

E NGAGEMENT M EASURES : H IGHEST AND LOWEST Academic Time Highest: CIP: Engineering, CIP: Health Professions, Career: Engineering Lowest: CIP: English, GPA: Under 2.7, CIP: Philosophy & Religious Studies Academic Engagement Highest: CIP: Philosophy & Religious Studies, Career: Law, CIP: History, English Lowest: Ethnicity: Asian, Lower Division, Career: Engineering Research Engagement Highest: Career: Research Scientist, CIP: Psychology, CIP: Biological Sciences Lowest: CIP: Liberal Arts; CIP: Philosophy; Lower Division; CIP: English Co-Curricular Leadership Highest: CIP: Communications, Upper Division, CIP: Business, Career: Law Lowest: Transfer Student, Independent Student, CIP: Mathematics, Lower Division Community Engagement Highest: CIP: Health Profession, Career: Medicine, CIP: Liberal Arts Lowest: CIP: Computer Science, Career: Engineering, CIP: Physical Science

THE SERU RESEARCH CHALLENGE Engage in a program of research that defines and validates the various measures of the academic, research, civic, and co-curricular engagement Conduct descriptive studies that can display the relationship of background variables and field of study to the distributions on these measures individually and together; examine variation across institutions Develop multivariate analyses that examine the relationship of engagement factors to outcomes (satisfaction, learning gains, post-graduate educational plans), controlling for background variables Produce and publicize research reports that effectively communicate the “broader view” of undergraduate experience at the research university as documented by our SERU research.

MAKING IT HAPPEN Ideas and reactions to the Research University Advantage idea Directions for the research Discussion