Chapter 8: System Stability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Behavior of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Advertisements

Chapter 8 Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Lect.8 Root Locus Techniques Basil Hamed
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Transient and steady state response (cont.)
Feedback Control Systems
Dynamic Behavior and Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Digital Control Systems Stability Analysis of Discrete Time Systems.
Discrete Controller Design (Deadbeat & Dahlin Controllers)
Chapter 6 – The Stability of Linear Feedback Systems
5.7 Impulse Functions In some applications, it is necessary to deal with phenomena of an impulsive nature—for example, voltages or forces of large magnitude.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition EE 3512 – Signals: Continuous and Discrete Objectives: Stability and the s-Plane Stability of an RC Circuit 1 st and 2 nd.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 3163 – Signals and Systems Objectives: Stability and the s-Plane Stability of an RC Circuit Routh-Hurwitz Stability.
Feedback Control System THE ROOT-LOCUS DESIGN METHOD Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul Chapter 5
Control Engineering Lecture# 10 & th April’2008.
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
1.1 Introduction Comparison between ACS and CCS. ACS CCS Process Actuator Measure Controller (correcting network) Structure: Process Actuator Measure.
1 Z-Transform. CHAPTER 5 School of Electrical System Engineering, UniMAP School of Electrical System Engineering, UniMAP NORSHAFINASH BT SAUDIN
Ch6 The Root Locus Method. Main content §The Root Locus Concept §The Root Locus Procedure §Generalized root locus or Parameter RL §Parameter design by.
ME375 Handouts - Spring 2002 Root Locus Method.
Chapter 7 Stability and Steady-State Error Analysis
Automatic Control Systems
Automatic Control Theory School of Automation NWPU Teaching Group of Automatic Control Theory.
Chapter 11 1 Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems Example 11.4 Consider the feedback control system shown in Fig with the following transfer.
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
System Stability (Special Cases) Date: 11 th September 2008 Prepared by: Megat Syahirul Amin bin Megat Ali
Lec 7. Higher Order Systems, Stability, and Routh Stability Criteria Higher order systems Stability Routh Stability Criterion Reading: 5-4; 5-5, 5.6 (skip.
Lecture 7 Poles and Zeros Stability. Transfer Function Models General Representation wh where z i are the zeros p i are the poles n ≥ m to have a physically.
Lecture 6: Stability of discrete-time systems 1. Suppose that we have the following transfer function of a closed-loop discrete-time system: The system.
Modern Control System EKT 308 Steady-State and Stability.
In The Name of Allah The Most Beneficent The Most Merciful
Discrete Controller Design
System Time Response Characteristics
Root Locus Techniques (Sketching Method) Date: 25 th September 2008 Prepared by: Megat Syahirul Amin bin Megat Ali
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Automatic Control Theory CSE 322 Lec. 11 Root Locus.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Modern Control System EKT 308
Stability Analysis . A system is BIBO stable if all poles or roots of
Lecture 14: Pole placement (Regulator Problem) 1.
7.1 Root Locus (RL) Principle We introduce the RL through an example. Consider servo motor system shown bellow The closed loop transfer function is motor.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Lec. 2 Transfer Functions & Block Diagrams.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Chapter 11 1 ERT 210/4 Process Control CHAPTER 11 DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS.
Chapter 6 The Stability of Linear Feedback System
Lecture 9\10 Analysis in the time domain (III) North China Electric Power University Sun Hairong.
1 Chapter 9 Mapping Contours in the s-plane The Nyquist Criterion Relative Stability Gain Margin and Phase Margin PID Controllers in the Frequency Domain.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 6. TRANSIENT RESPONSE -- STABILITY Pusan National University Intelligent.
3.0 Time Response OBJECTIVE
General Stability Criterion Most industrial processes are stable without feedback control. Thus, they are said to be open-loop stable or self-regulating.
Stability Analysis for Control Systems Compiled By: Waqar Ahmed Assistant Professor Mechanical UET, Taxila Compiled By: Waqar Ahmed Assistant Professor.
Routh-Herwitz Stability Criterion
Salman Bin Abdulaziz University
Digital and Non-Linear Control
Chapter 5 Root Locus.
Digital and Non-Linear Control
Control Systems (CS) Lecture-17 Routh-Herwitz Stability Criterion
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Learning Outcomes After completing this ppt the student will be able to: Make and interpret a basic Routh table to determine the stability of a system.
Effects of Zeros and Additional Poles
Methods of Determining Stability
Time-Domain Analysis of Control Systems (3)
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Chapter 6 – The Stability of Linear Feedback Systems
Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems
7. Stability [Ref:Rao] 7.1 System stability
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
Chapter 6. STABILITY Good relationships nurture you. They help you find yourself and who you are. I don’t mean just relationships with boys or men. Relationships.
Methods of Determining Stability
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 8: System Stability

Stability of discrete-time systems Suppose we have the following transfer function of a closed-loop system: The stability of the system depends on the location of the poles of the closed-loop transfer function, or the roots of the characteristic equation D(z) = 0. It was shown in Chapter 7 that the left-hand side of the s-plane, where a continuous system is stable, maps into the interior of the unit circle in the z-plane. Thus, we can conlude that a system in the z-plane will be stable if all the roots of the characteristic equation, D(z) = 0, lie inside the unit circle.

Stability of discrete-time systems There are several methods to check the stability of a discrete-time system such as: Factorizing D(z) = 0 and finding its roots. Jury’s test. Routh–Hurwitz criterion .

8.1 Factorizing the characteristic equation The direct method to check the stability of a system is to factorize the characteristic equation, determine its roots, and check if their magnitudes are all less than 1. It is not usually easy to factorize the characteristic equation by hand. However, using Matlab command “roots”, this is very easy. This type of test tell us whether a system is stable or not. It does not tell us how the stability is affected if the gain or some other parameter is changed in the system.

Example 8.1 The block diagram of a closed-loop system is shown in Figure 8.1. Determine whether or not the system is stable. Assume that T = 1 s.

Solution: The transfer function of the closed-loop system is Where For T = 1 sec, The characteristic equation is The root of the characteristic equation z = -1.594 which is outside the unit circle, i.e. the system is not stable.

Example 8.2 In the previous example, find the value of T for which the system is stable.

Solution: From the previous example, we got The characteristic equation is Hence, the pole is For stability, the condition |z|<1 must be satisfied; Thus the system is stable as long as T < 0.549.

8.2 Jury’s stability test Jury’s stability test is similar to the Routh–Hurwitz stability criterion used for continuous systems. To describe Jury’s test, express the characteristic equation of a discrete-time system of order n as We now form the following:

8.2 Jury’s stability test The elements of this array are defined as follows: The elements of each even-numbered row are the elements of the preceding row, in reverse order. The elements of the odd-numbered rows are defined as:

8.2 Jury’s stability test The necessary and sufficient conditions for the characteristic equation to have all roots inside the unit circle are given as Jury’s test is applied as follows: Check the three conditions (I) and stop if any of them is not satisfied. Construct Jury’s array and check the conditions (II). Stop if any condition is not satisfied.

Jury test for 2nd order polynomial For 2nd characteristic equation: Jury’s test reduces to the following simple rules: no roots of the system characteristic equation will be on or outside the unit circle provided that

Jury test for 3rd order polynomial For 3rd order characteristic equation: Jury’s test reduces to the following simple rules: no roots of the system characteristic equation will be on or outside the unit circle provided that

Example 8.3 The closed-loop transfer function of a system is given by Where Determine the stability of this system using Jury’s test.

Solution The characteristic equation is Or Applying Jury’s test All conditions are satisfied and the system is stable.

Example 8.5 Determine the stability of the system having the following characteristic equation:

Example 8.7 The block diagram of a sampled data system is shown in Figure 8.2. Use Jury’s test to determine the value of K for which the system is stable. Assume that K > 0 and T = 1 s.

Apply Jury’s test: The third condition is Combining all inequalities together, the system is stable for K < 2.4

Example System is unstable! Determine the stability of the system having the following characteristic equation: |b0|=0.75< |b3|=1.5 |c0|=1.6875> |c2|=0.75 System is unstable!

8.3 Routh–Hurwitz Criterion The stability of a sampled data system can be analyzed by transforming the system characteristic equation into the s-plane and then applying the well-known Routh–Hurwitz criterion. A bilinear transformation is usually used to transform the left-hand s-plane into the interior of the unit circle in the z-plane. For this transformation, z is replaced by giving the characteristic equation in w ,

8.3 Routh–Hurwitz Criterion The Routh-Hurwitz array is formed as shown. The first two rows are obtained from the equation directly and the other rows are calculated as shown. The Routh–Hurwitz criterion states that the number of roots of the characteristic equation in the right hand s-plane is equal to the number of sign changes of the coefficients in the first column of the array. Thus, for a stable system all coefficients in the first column must have the same sign.

Example 8.6 The characteristic equation of a sampled data system is given by Determine the stability of the system using the Routh–Hurwitz criterion.

Now, we form Routh array: To check the answer, the roots of the characteristic equation, are found using Matlab command roots([ 2 1 1 1]) to be 0.1195 + 0.8138i 0.1195 - 0.8138i -0.7390 As we are interested their magnitudes, we can write directly abs(roots([ 2 1 1 1])). This gives 0.8226, 0.8226, 0.7390 which are all less than one, i.e. the roots lie inside the unit circle. Hence, we can conclude that the system is stable. No sign change in the first column, so the system is stable.