A HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCHOLARLY LITERATURE Shelly Warwick, Ph.D. 2012 – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non-commercial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper Rob Sneyd (with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)
Advertisements

What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Evidence-Based Medicine
Study Designs in Epidemiologic
Critical Appraisal: Epidemiology 101 POS Lecture Series April 28, 2004.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
What is going on with psychotherapy today? Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D.
Reading the Dental Literature
Online Resources for Evidence- Based Clinical Care Elizabeth Eckstrom, MD, MPH Oregon Health & Science University Carol Howe, MD, MLS University of Arizona.
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Reviewing the Literature P9419 Class #4 October 20, 2003.
Information Resources for Evidence-Based Medicine A Review 3 rd Year Family Medicine Clerkship - EBM.
Evidence-Based Practice for Pharmacy Y2 Pamela Corley, MLS, AHIP Joe Pozdol, MLIS Norris Medical Library 2003 Zonal Ave. Los Angeles, CA
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Shelly Warwick, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non- commercial educational use as long as attribution is provided.
BC Jung A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - XI (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Experimental/Interventional Studies) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
Shelly Warwick, MLS, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non-commercial educational use as long as attribution is provided.
Methodology Describe Context & setting Design Participants Sampling Power Analysi s Interventions Outcome (study variables) Data Collection Procedures.
Study Design. Study Designs Descriptive Studies Record events, observations or activities,documentaries No comparison group or intervention Describe.
Excellence in Nursing Practice Through Research, EBP & Application to Bedside Patient Care Chesapeake Bay Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses Saturday, February.
Research Study Design. Objective- To devise a study method that will clearly answer the study question with the least amount of time, energy, cost, and.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Evidence-Based Journal Article Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department.
Finding Relevant Evidence
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Shelly Warwick, MLS, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non-commercial educational use as long as attribution is provided.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger. Academic viva 2 papers 1 hour to read both Viva on both papers Summary-what is the paper about.
Clinical Information Resources Sandra A. Martin, M.L.I.S. Health Sciences Resource Coordinator Instructor of Library Services John Vaughan Library Room.
Evidence and Experience Based Medicine Successfully implementing research into your practice.
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
Evidence-Based Medicine – Definitions and Applications 1 Component 2 / Unit 5 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
Christopher Manacci, MSN, ACNP, CCRN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Critical Care Transport Services The Cleveland Clinic Director, ACNP Flight Nursing.
Study designs. Kate O’Donnell General Practice & Primary Care.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
Is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of the individual patient (Dr. David Sackett)
Using PubMed to search for Evidence-Based Medicine Reference Section Conrado F. Asenjo Library UPR-MSC.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9a: Evidence Based.
Lecture 2: Evidence Level and Types of Research. Do you recommend flossing to your patients? Of course YES! Because: I have been taught to. I read textbooks.
Research Design Evidence Based Medicine Concepts and Glossary.
Shelly Warwick, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non- commercial educational use as long as attribution is provided.
Levels of Evidence Dr Chetan Khatri Steering Committee, STARSurg.
Evidence-Based Medicine: A Basic Primer Kevin Bradford, M.L.S. Clinical Information Librarian Instructor Medical College of Georgia April 2007.
Article Title Resident Name, MD SVCH6/13/2016 Journal Club.
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
Grants 101: From Research Idea to Literature Review Jan Glover, MLS Mary Warner, MMSc, PA-C Yale School of Medicine.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
A quick reference to literature searches
HelpDesk Answers Evaluating the Evidence (Levels of Evidence)
Critically Appraising a Medical Journal Article
Types of Research Studies Architecture of Clinical Research
The Research Design Continuum
Evidence-Based Practice I: Definition – What is it?
Randomized Trials: A Brief Overview
Evidence-Based Medicine
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
11/20/2018 Study Types.
Essential Evidence Plus,
Module 4 Finding the Evidence: Individual Trials
Level of Evidence Lecture 4.
Presentation transcript:

A HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCHOLARLY LITERATURE Shelly Warwick, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non-commercial educational use as long as attribution is provided and the edited work is also available under the same terms of license.

After this Unit You Should Be Able to Know where each type of study falls within the evidence hierarchy. Explain the difference between a narrative review, systematic review and meta-analysis. Select the correct study type(s) to answer a specific research question.

Remember the Evidence Hierarchy The top of the pyramid is best – but if high level studies aren’t available – use what is Animal Research Case Series/Case Reports Randomized Controlled Trials Cohort Studies Systematic Reviews Case Control Studies Meta Analysis

Differences in Study Types in the Pyramid -1 Animal Studies – studies using animals not humans Case Series and Case Reports – reports of the treatment of individual patients or a single patient. No use of control group. No statistical validity. Case Control Studies – retrospective studies comparing patients with a specific condition or outcome to those without the condition or outcome to determine exposures or causes. Can show statistical relationship but not necessarily a causal relationship.

Differences in Study Types in the Pyramid -2. Cohort Studies – prospective observational studies of patients already being treated or who have had exposure. Studied group is often compared to general population or similar population not treated. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCT) – treatment of real patients under controlled conditions – including randomization to treatment or no treatment and blinding of which group the individual is assigned from both the patient and individual(s) providing follow-up and collecting results.

Differences in Study Types in the Pyramid -3 Systematic Reviews - based on extensive exhaustive literature search to identify studies that focus on a highly defined question. Results summarized according to predetermined criteria. Not to be confused with Narrative Review articles that review recent literature on a topic but are usually not exhaustive. Meta-analysis – goes beyond the Systematic Review to combining results of studies using accepted statistical methodology to produce a single conclusion.

Use the Right Type of Study for Your Question Type of Question Suggested best type of study Diagnosisprospective, blind comparison to a gold standard TherapyRCT > cohort > case control > case series Prognosiscohort study > case control > case series Harm/Etiolog y RCT > cohort > case control > case series PreventionRCT > cohort study > case control > case series Clinical Examprospective, blind comparison to gold standard Cost Benefiteconomic analysis

MOVE ON TO MODULE 5 – CONTROLLED VOCABULARIES