Why change from PDAS? PDAS 1997

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Inside look at District and School Transformation
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Texas Evaluation and Support System
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Systems for Moving Forward
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
The 5 E Instructional Model
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Thinking about assessment…
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
21 st Century Assessment Examples of Practice Clinic Session 9:45 – 11:15.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Instructional Leadership Team April 28, Guiding Theme for
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
EVAL Introduction RIG 2 – Cohort 1 October 29, 2012 Cathey Frederick ESD 189 eVAL Specialist.
Internal Assessment Report: A qualitative report on the implementation of district performance assessments and an update on the AIM initiative Presentation.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Washoe County School District Mike Paul- Director of Professional Growth Systems and TIF3 & TIF4 Grants Yvette Deighton- TIF4 Program Coordinator Jim Grace.
Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
DSEI Raymond J. McNulty, Aligned for Success Doctors/Nurses in Hospitals Pilots in Flight Troops in Battle Teachers in a School.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Goal Setting and Professional Development Plan Teacher Overview.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Why change from PDAS? PDAS 1997 INTENDED to be a professional development system Became system focused more on compliance with rules Education has evolved, so evaluation needs to follow T-TESS seeks to create open, collaborative environment with focus on instructional and professional improvement

PDAS to T-TESS

Rationale for T-TESS Formalize what highly effective teachers do Collaborative& supportive cultures Develop habits of self-assessment, reflection, and adjustment Formalize what highly effective teachers do

Timeline 2014-15 60 pilot districts Feedback and data collection 2015-16 Pilot extended to 200 districts Refinement 2016-17 Statewide rollout

T-TESS Pilot Schools 2015 - 16 Birdville HS Shannon HS North Richland MS Richland MS North Ridge ES Mullendore ES Spicer ES Birdville ES Foster Village ES Walker Creek ES Richland ES Hardeman ES Watauga ES

Goal-Setting and Professional Development Process What is T-TESS? Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Goal-Setting and Professional Development Process 10% Student Growth -Student Learning Objectives -Value-add scores -Portfolios -District Pre and Post tests 20% Observation Descriptive Rubrics for Each Domain 70%

Three Keys of Evaluation Ongoing Relationships Formative and Timely

T-TESS Domains

Practice = Performance

Teacher Self-Assessment and Goal-Setting Process

Post-Conference Plan

Feedback from Pilot Districts Pilot Lessons Learned Clear, consistent message of support and growth The rubric is central Questioning skills - conferencing It takes time, but time spent is worth it

Alignment to BISD Vision Planning Collaboration Student Engagement Rigor & Relevance Embracing Change Process Improvement Growth PDAS or T-TESS?

A B C D Discussion & Decision Pilot schools 2015-16, add remaining schools for 2016-17 Pilot schools 2015-16 and then decide how to move forward No pilot 2015-16, all schools begin 2016-17 Continue using PDAS with no support from TEA A B C D