Www.smcoe.org San Mateo County Results from the 2014 SBAC Field Test Survey Deann Walsh Manager, Learning Analytics & Program Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DELAWARE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Presented to District Test Coordinators February 17, 2010.
Advertisements

Field Testing Testing the Test March PARCC Consortium 2 Governed by the education chiefs in the states.
Beginning in DTC Spring Workshop January 22, 2013.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services March 21, 2014.
Smarter Balanced Assessments SBAC Field Test this spring Field Test will determine cut points for proficiency levels, validity of items Will not be used.
Tablet Computers and Standards of Learning Testing: Insights from the Virginia Department of Education Monday, August 12, 2013.
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know … and Share with You.
PARCC Progress Update 1 June 26, In the Last Year… 2 June 2012 Minimum Technology Specifications, Version 1.0, Released Item Development Began August.
Field Tests … Tests of the test questions Jeff Nellhaus, PARCC, Inc. Louisiana Common Core Implementation Conference February 19,
PARCC Assessment Administration Guidance 1. PARCC Assessment Design Summative Assessments 2 Performance- Based Assessment End-of-Year Assessment  After.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Program Smarter Balanced Coordinator Training January – February Smarter.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Smarter Balanced Assessment Update California Mathematics.
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
Race to the Top Technology and Innovation in Assessments Boston, MA Tony Alpert Oregon Department of Education.
DEEPENING ASSESSMENT LITERACY Fall Objective  Identify best practices for local assessment development  Provide a working knowledge of the WPSD.
Principal Meeting: Accountability and Assessment Update Brian Huff March 18, 2015.
CII Smarter Balanced Assessments
Smarter Balanced – An Overview Elementary Early Release January 7, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Transitioning.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Transitioning.
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library Brian Huff September 3, 2014.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Statewide Assessment Update Vince Dean, Ph.D. Director, Office of Standards & Assessment January 30, 2013 SIFN.
Critical Information SAGE Critical Information 1 Judy Park, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Utah State Office of Education.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 4 th District Parent Teacher Association March 18, 2014 Deborah.
PARCC Assessment Administration Guidance
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
PARCC Update June 6, PARCC Update Today’s Presentation:  PARCC Field Test  Lessons Learned from the Field Test  PARCC Resources 2.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Butte County Office of Education September 19, 2014 Interim.
“Every Child a Graduate” Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction SPECIAL EDCATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Life-long learning and continuous.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on Key Transition and Smarter Balanced Assessment Development.
PARCC Assessment Administration Guidance 1. PARCC System Purpose: To increase the rates at which students graduate from high school prepared for success.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Project Director – Dr. Mark Lung Dept of Natural & Environmental Sciences Western State College of Colorado Project Evaluator – Dr. Dave Shannon Educational.
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know February 2013 Margaret Horn, Vice President, State Engagement & Outreach Lesley Muldoon, Associate Director,
WELCOME BACK! COPPER RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT-WIDE “BACK-TO-SCHOOL” IN-SERVICE FRIDAY, AUGUST 16, 2013.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
San Mateo County Office of Education February 8, 2013.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
Oxford Preparatory Academy Scholar Academy Parent Social Topic: Changes in State Testing May 4, 5, and 6, 2015.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
SBAC Field Test in RUSD After-Action Review Brian Huff May 30, 2014.
KAREN TOHINAKA SAGE Overview. What is SAGE? SAGE (Student Assessment of Growth and Excellence)  is Utah’s computer adaptive assessment system aligned.
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
1 minutes Running Time + 1 minutes
MSP Program Evaluation Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings 1/27/09 and 2/5/09 Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings.
MTSS PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER, 2013 NCSC Summative Assessment Update.
SBAC Interim TA Test Administration Responsibilities Presented by the Assessment Team Presented to OUSD teachers 1/13/2016.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Transitioning.
SBCUSD and Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Testing Assessment and Accountability, January 2013.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT PARA LOS NIÑOS APRIL 30, 2013 Transitioning to the Common Core.
1 1 Overview of PARCC Field Test The following slides are from a MA DESE presentation to districts. 1.
2016 CAASPP Results Overview and Reflection August
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards
Presentation transcript:

San Mateo County Results from the 2014 SBAC Field Test Survey Deann Walsh Manager, Learning Analytics & Program Evaluation

Agenda Field Test Overview Field Test Survey Results Student Survey Teacher/Proctor Survey Administrator Survey Next Steps

“A field test is not designed to be a valid and reliable measure of student achievement; rather, it is designed to help the test developers evaluate whether the test, individual items, and the technology platform work as intended before the first operational administration.” Deborah S. Delisle, U.S. Department of Education

Field Test Overview Timeline: o March 25 th through June 6 th o Schools assigned a five- or six- week window Participants: o Grades 3-8: All students o Grades 9 & 10: Only students selected for the scientific sample o Grade 11: Students selected for the scientific sample; all others encouraged Components: o Performance Task o Non-performance Task Format: Computer-based; not computer adaptive

SBAC Field Test Surveys Survey Number of Responses Number of Districts Responding Student Teacher/Proctor33617 Administrator5613

Student Survey Results Methodology Used o Weighted student results based on % of 2013 STAR testing population Approximately 28% of students encountered problems with the technology or testing system Student Preparation 50% Completed a practice test together as a class 53% Completed a practice test individually 54% Teacher reviewed technology needed for testing (i.e. computer, mouse)

Student Survey Results, Continued Testing Conditions 33% Computer Lab 56% Classroom with Laptops 4% Classroom with Tablets 7% Other Content Approximately 56% of students polled felt comfortable or very comfortable with their understanding of the questions asked

Teacher/Proctor Survey Results * Highest ranked item of the PD options Teacher Preparation 93% Overview of the SBAC Field Test 66% Instruction on the selection and administration of universal tools, designated supports and accommodations 78% Demonstration of the test administrator interface 70% Physical copies of required manuals

Teacher/Proctor Survey Results Impact on Instruction 53% indicated that the use of computer devices for testing purposes impacted their ability to use technology for instructional purposes Professional Development 85% of teachers ranked “training on preparing students for the content” as important or very important* *Highest ranked item of the PD options

Administrator Survey Results Technology & Systems 66% Experienced significant glitches in the system (e.g. device failure, missing log-in information) 89% Indicated that the network and bandwidth were reliable during testing Impact on Instruction 67% indicated that the use of computer devices for testing purposes impacted the school’s ability to use technology for instructional purposes

Next Steps SBAC Digital Library o Preview began on June 3 rd o Digital Library SMCOE August 5 th o Operational version to begin on October 1 st Interim Assessments – Available Fall 2014 o Interim Comprehensive Assessment (ICA) o Interim Assessment Blocks (IAB)

Next Steps Summative Assessment – Spring 2015 o Administered in the last 12 weeks of the school year o Operational test will differ from field test in terms of duration & length

SMCOE Support CIS Support o Teacher Professional Development o Administrator Professional Development ESS Support o District Assessment Leader Network o Regional Learning Analytics Institutes o Target Supported on Universal Tools, Designated Supports and Accommodations with Special Education & Assessment Staff

Questions?