Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Assessment of air pollution by cadmium CZECH REPUBLIC EMEP Heavy metal case study Milan Váňa, Pavel Machálek + MSC-E.
Advertisements

ICP VEGETATION 29 th session WGE Integrated science for our changing world European moss survey 2010/11  Confirmed participation: HM & N.
Indicators for policy support of atmosphere related environmental problems Robert Koelemeijer National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
The robustness of the source receptor relationships used in GAINS Hilde Fagerli, EMEP/MSC-W EMEP/MSC-W.
Trend analysis: methodology
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2013 Heavy metal and POP pollution: Dissemination of output information Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Assessment of HM and POP pollution in EMEP domain Long-term trends ( ) Pollution levels (2012) Transboundary transport Intercontinental transport.
TFMM & TFEIP Workshop, Dublin, 2007 Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya
Modelled results vs. emission estimates S.Dutchak, I.Ilyin, O.Travnikov, O.Rozovskaya, M.Varygina EMEP/MSC-East Modelled results vs. emission estimates.
Observation and Modeling Evidence of Ozone Transport to and from Asia Hajime Akimoto (Oliver Wild and Pakpong Pochanart) Frontier Research Center for Global.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2014 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Monitoring/modelling activities on POPs in 2015 and future work Victor Shatalov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
7 th Joint TFEIP & EIONET meeting, Thessaloniki, 2006 Heavy metal modelling: Use of different emission inventories Oleg Travnikov EMEP/MSC-E.
Trend analysis of HMs and POPs on the basis of measurements and modelling data Victor Shatalov and Oleg Travnikov, MSC-E.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2014 Activities on monitoring and modelling of POPs in 2014 and future work Victor Shatalov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale Ilya Ilyin, Oleg Travnikov, Victor Shatalov, Alexey Gusev Meteorological Synthesizing Centre.
Evaluation of pollution levels of lead and PCB-153 over Central Asian (CA) countries within CAPACT project (preliminary results) Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2015 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Evaluation of concentrations of air pollutants and depositions of HMs over the EECCA and SEE regions Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E EMEP/MSC-E TFHM, May 14-16,
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
Air Quality trend analyses under EMEP/TFMM and link to EEA work Augustin COLETTE (INERIS), Chair of the TFMM/CLRTAP TFMM National Experts, CCC, MSC-E,
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
EMEP WGSR, EMEP Progress on HMs, 2006  Review and evaluation of the MSCE-HM model (TFMM)  Atmospheric pollution in 2004 (emissions, monitoring.
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
EMEP/WGE Bureau, Geneva, March 2016 Main results of Long-term trends of HMs and POPs on the basis of modeling results and measurements.
TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 GMOS: Multi-model assessment of mercury pollution and processes Environment Canada Oleg Travnikov, Johannes Bieser, Ashu.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
17 th TFMM Meeting, 17 – 20 May, 2016 Progress of HM and POP modelling: main activities and results Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor Shatalov,
OsloCTM2  3D global chemical transport model  Standard tropospheric chemistry/stratospheric chemistry or both. Gas phase chemistry + essential heteorogenous.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2016 Evaluation of B[a]P pollution in the EMEP region: temporal trends and spatial variability Alexey Gusev, Olga Rozovskaya,
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Overview of country-specific studies of heavy metal and POP pollution
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale
EMEP case study on heavy metal pollution assessment:
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
9th TFMM, Bordeaux, France, April 2008
MSC-E contribution concerning heavy metals
Progress and problems of POP modelling
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
Future activities in POP modelling
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Model uncertainties because of inconsistencies of emissions
Trend analysis of contamination in the EMEP region by HMs & POPs
Research of heavy metal pollution on regional (EMEP) and national (Germany) scales Ilyin I, Travnikov O. EMEP/MSC-E.
Multi-scale approach to HM and POP modelling
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Co-operation with TF on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs
Wish list for modelling (first priority)
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Integration of the work between EMEP and WGE
Comparison of model results with measurements
Iakovos Barmpadimos, André Prévôt, Johannes Keller, Christoph Hüglin
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Summary of discussion (1)
Assessment of heavy metal pollution within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 List of trend parameters Parameters for trend characterization:  Relative reduction over the whole period (R tot ),  Relative annual reductions of contamination:  average over the period (R av ),  maximum (R max ),  minimum (R min ).  Relative contribution of seasonal variability (F seas ).  Relative contribution of random component (F rand ).  Phase shift of maximum values of contamination with respect to the beginning of the year (φ). Statistical tests:  Non-linearity parameter (NL)10%  Relative contribution of seasonal variability (F seas )10%

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report  Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations Seasonality Random component Shift relative to beginning of year  Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates Overall reduction  Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources.)  Changes of transboundary transport  Pollution levels caused by emission source categories  Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation)  Large Point Sources (LPS)  Deposition to ecosystems

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014  Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations Seasonality Random component Shift relative to beginning of year  Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates Overall reduction  Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. )  Changes of transboundary transport  Pollution levels caused by emission source categories  Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation)  Large Point Sources (LPS)  Deposition to ecosystems Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Application of the analysis of trends to individual stations Hg and B[a]P - in air - wet deposition - collocated Pb, Cd Selection of stations: data available from to (Pb, Cd) from 1996 to (Hg, B[a]P) Pb, Cd: 15 stations Hg: 6 stations B[a]P: 6 stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Observed air concentrations of Pb for station DE1 (Germany) Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring stations Analysis of modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Observed air concentrations of Pb their trend for station DE1 (Germany) Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring stations NL = 45% Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Modelled air concentrations of Pb their trend for station DE1 (Germany) NL = 43% Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Average among stations Max among stations Min among stations Non-linearity of observed and modelled trends at monitoring stations Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Non-linearity: summary for HMs and POPs Air concentrationsWet deposition Threshold value: 10% Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Non-linearity: summary for HMs and POPs Air concentrationsWet deposition Threshold value: 10%  As a rule, trends of observed and modelled levels at stations are non-linear Linear trend at all stations Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations Non-linear trend at all stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Observed air concentrations and their trend, including seasonality for station DE1 (Germany) Analysis of long-term trends at monitoring stations: seasonality C seas = 50% Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Air concentrationsWet deposition Seasonality: summary for HMs and POPs Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Air concentrationsWet deposition Seasonality: summary for HMs and POPs Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Air concentrationsWet deposition Seasonality: summary for HMs and POPs Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Observed air concentrations and their trend, including seasonality for station DE1 (Germany) Analysis of long-term trends at monitoring stations: random component C rand = 66% Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Random component: summary for HMs and POPs Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Analysis of long-term trends at monitoring stations: phase shift Observed wet deposition and their trend, including seasonality for station NO39 (Norway) Δφ = ~6 months Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Month of maximum air concentrations of Pb trend in Phase shifts: summary for all stations (Pb, air concentrations) Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations Number of month with maximum

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Δφ model = 6 months Trends of modelled and observed concentrations of Pb at DE3 (Germany)  DE3 is located at height 1200 m (but in the model at 550 m)  This station may characterize conditions mostly in free troposphere rather then in boundary layer Possible explanation of difference in modelled and observed phase shifts (to be examined) Modelled and observed levels at monitoring stations Δφ model ~ 1 month

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Concluding remarks  As a rule, trends of observed and modelled levels at stations are non-linear. Exception is concentrations of Hg in air  Trends of observed and modelled levels at stations exhibit substantial seasonal variability (except of Hg in air). The most pronounced seasonality is noted for B[a]P  Random component characterizes non-regular short-term seasonal meteorological variability

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report  Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations Seasonality Random component Shift relative to beginning of year  Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates Overall reduction  Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. )  Changes of transboundary transport  Pollution levels caused by emission source categories  Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation)  Large Point Sources (LPS)  Deposition to ecosystems

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014  Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations Seasonality Random component Shift relative to beginning of year  Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates Overall reduction  Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. )  Changes of transboundary transport  Pollution levels caused by emission source categories  Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation)  Large Point Sources (LPS)  Deposition to ecosystems Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014  Information on long-term changes of modelled and observed levels at the EMEP stations Seasonality Random component Shift relative to beginning of year  Changes of pollution levels in the EMEP countries Average, minimum and maximum reduction rates Overall reduction  Analysis of factors affecting long-term changes (anthropogenic and secondary emissions, meteorological variability, non-EMEP emission sources. )  Changes of transboundary transport  Pollution levels caused by emission source categories  Trends in different media (soil, seas, vegetation)  Large Point Sources (LPS)  Deposition to ecosystems Information on long-term changes of HM and POP levels for the report

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Analysis of pollution trends in the EMEP region

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Analysis of pollution trends in the EMEP region

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Analysis of pollution trends in the EMEP region Reduction = 3.4% per yearReduction = 6 (5 – 7)% per year Reduction = 1.2 (-3.2 – 3.9)% per year Reduction = 2.2 (1.1 – 3.1)% per year

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Mean reduction rate of pollution levels in the EMEP countries for Rates of total deposition reduction of lead in the EMEP countries Average rate for period Maximum (beginning of the period) Minimum (end of the period) Trends in the EMEP region

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Rates of total deposition reduction of lead in the EMEP countries Trends in the EMEP region

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Trends in the EMEP region Rates of total deposition reduction of lead in the EMEP countries

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 B[a]P Trends in the EMEP region Rates of total deposition reduction of B[a]P in the EMEP countries

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 B[a]P Rates of total deposition reduction of B[a]P in the EMEP countries Trends in the EMEP region

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Mean among countries Maximum among countries Minimum among countries 95 percentile 5 percentile Average among countries 25 percentile 75 percentile Average reduction rate and overall reduction in the EMEP countries for Mean annual reduction rates in countries

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Average reduction rate and overall reduction in the EMEP countries for Mean annual reduction rates in countries Overall reduction in countries for

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Factors affecting long-term trends Meteorological variability Secondary emission sources Anthropogenic emissions Main factors affecting trends: Transboundary transport Changes in atmospheric composition Non-EMEP sources (boundary conditions)

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Factors affecting long-term trends Dimensionless emission of Pb in Europe

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Factors affecting long-term trends Dimensionless emission and deposition of Pb in Europe Deposition reduction is smaller Deposition trend is less smooth Compared to the emission trend: Main factors affecting deposition trends: Anthropogenic emissions Meteorological variability Secondary emission sources

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Model calculations for to determine influence of factors affecting trends Anthrop. emission Meteo Secondary sources Effect of anthrop. emission Effect of meteorology Effect of secondary emission Varies Fixed “Fixed” – relates to 1990 Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Relative deposition changes caused by different factors Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74% Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74% Major factor of Pb long-term changes is anthropogenic emission Relative deposition changes caused by different factors Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74% Major factor of Pb long-term changes is anthropogenic emission Meteorological variability responsible for ±10% of deposition in Europe as a whole Relative deposition changes caused by different factors Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Overall reduction of Pb deposition ~74% Major factor of Pb long-term changes is anthropogenic emission Meteorological variability responsible for ±10% of deposition in Europe as a whole Effect of secondary sources is explained by long-term decline of concentrations in soils In countries of Europe the effect of these factors may be different Relative deposition changes caused by different factors Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Effect of transboundary transport on long-term changes of pollution levels Reduction of Pb deposition 1990 and 2010 in the EMEP region

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Reduction of Pb deposition caused by changes of national, foreign and sum of secondary and non-EMEP sources between 1990 and 2010 in countries of the EMEP region Deposition of Pb Effect of transboundary transport on long-term changes of pollution levels Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Reduction of Pb deposition caused by changes of national, foreign and sum of secondary and non-EMEP sources between 1990 and 2010 in countries of the EMEP region Deposition of Pb Effect of transboundary transport on long-term changes of pollution levels Factors affecting long-term trends

TFMM trend analysis workshop, November 2014 Changes in key source categories Contribution of source categories to HM deposition in EMEP countries MercuryLead 18