Instructional Design Arif Altun.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Curriculum Development and Course Design
Advertisements

Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Basic Concepts of Strategic Management
The Instructional Design Process November 9, 2000.
Designing an Educational Program Kathy Stewart, MD David Feldstein, MD PCFDP11/13/10.
ADDIE A Technology Instrument By Margarita C. Chavez.
Instructional Design Brian Newberry. Instructional Design Instructional Design is a systematic process for the creation of educational resources. It is.
King Saud University College of nursing Master program.
Chapter 3 Teaching with Instructional Software M. D. Roblyer Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 4/E Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education,
Instructional Design Methods of Teaching Adults Spring Interim, May 2001 O riginal Slide Presentation Developed by Dr. Gary Moore at NC State.
King Saud University College of nursing Master program.
Smith & Ragan Model Presenter: Sensen Li. Definition of Instructional Design The systematic and reflective process of translating principles of learning.
Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Learning Outcomes Are formulated by the academic staff, preferably involving student representatives in the.
Tutorial of Instructional Design
Questions to Consider What are the components of a comprehensive instructional design plan? What premises underline the instructional design process?
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Outline What is Instructional Design? History Theories and Models Conclusion.
ADDIE Danae Gaines Acker Management of Technology Resources Dr. Michael Murphy September 12, 2014.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
By Jaqueline Lundie EDIT 6100 Fall IDT Cohort, 2009.
Principles of Instructional Design. Instructional Design is... the systematic process of translating principles of learning and instruction into specifications.
Welcome Introduction to Instructional Design LECTURE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT – FKIP SRIWIJAYA UNIVERSITY
Instructional Design Presentation Instructional Design & Course Review by Christine Leake.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Instructional Design Aeman Alabuod. Instructional Design instructional Design (also called Instructional Systems Design (ISD)) is the practice of creating.
Planning, Instruction, and Technology Pertemuan 9
IMPROVING GRADES, COMPREHENSION and INTEREST in DEVELOPMENTAL MATH COURSES Paola Di Muro - Brandon University NADE 2009.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Click to edit Master title style  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text.
Conduct Instructional Analysis Identify Instructional Goal(s) Analyze Learners & Contexts Write Performance Objectives Develop Assessment Instruments Develop.
LISA HOLMES INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN. The process of creating an effective learning experience that takes into consideration: what needs to be learned what.
Instructional design principles and models Mart Laanpere, M.Sc. in educational technology Tallinn University of Educational and Social Sciences
This project is focused on how to work with a required district curriculum that is very rigid and still address the instructional problem. Problem/Need:
Performance Technology Dr. James J. Kirk Professor of HRD.
Higher-Level Cognitive Processes
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
Instructional/Program Design Produced by Dr. James J. Kirk Professor of HRD Western Carolina University.
Advanced Instructional Design Dr. Karen Rasmussen EDG 6335.
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Designing Learning Competency Modeling Focus on learner Focus on learner Identify and validate performance objectives Identify and validate performance.
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Assoc. Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
Human Learning Asma Marghalani.
Cleo Sgouropoulou * Educational Technology & Didactics of Informatics Educational Technology & Didactics of Informatics Instructional.
Instructional Design the approach of Robert Gagne ( Conditions of Learning, 1985)
Dick Clark, Rich DiNinni and Gary Rauchfuss November , 2006
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
HTI: Instructional Theories. Why instructional theories? Getting back to the basics Examine the function of parts – Need to optimize When do I have enough?
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
Instructional Development Welcome to ISTC 667. Instruction n What makes it successful? n Considerations?
The Instructional Design Process
By Mario Carrizo. Definition Instructional design is define basically as the person who teaches, designs or develops instructions. Instructional designers.
Final Presentation, European Cooperative House Brussels, 16 Dec.2009 Training +45 “Teachers Facilitating Learning among Elders” WP5 Test and Evaluation.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
Instructional Lesson Design Models
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Many definitions exist for instructional design 1. Instructional Design as a Process: 2. Instructional Design as a Discipline: 3.
CEIT 225 Instructional Design
Educational Technology and Instructional Design
Repair of Perineal Lacerations: A “Train-the-Trainer” Workshop
Instructional Design Gibran Carter.
Instructional Design Models
Deep dive on learning progressions + Critiquing lesson methods
Developing an Instructional Strategy
Motive; Motivation An inner drive, impulse, etc. that causes one to act; incentive (Webster, 1996)
The Field of Instructional Design and Technology
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Instructional Design Models
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Design Arif Altun

Why ID? Designing effective instructional materials is one way of improving the quality of educational opportunities. The common concern of instructional designers is the facilitation of successful learning experiences from which learners can demonstrate their newly acquired knowledge, skills and attitudes. UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

What is an ISD ? Instructional design refers to the systematic process of translating principles of learning and instruction into plans or specifications for instructional materials or activities. UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Who is an instructional designer ? Instructional designers use established learning theories and principles as problem solving procedures (models) to guide them in making decisions about their designs. (Smith and Ragan, 1999) UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Metaphors used for ISD Instructional design can be regarded as both a science and an art: a science because it is rooted in learning theories which in turn draw their principles from psychology, sociology, philosophy and education; and, an art because the designing of instructional materials is a highly creative process. UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Intitial Questions sought answers Goals: What are the goals of the instruction? (Where are we going?) Instructional strategy: What is the instructional strategy and the instructional medium? (How will we get there?) Evaluation: How will we evaluate and revise the instructional materials for future improvement? (How will we know when we have arrived?) (Smith and Ragan, 1999) UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Common Features of ID Models Improving learning and instruction by following a systematic approach Improving management of instructional design and development procedures by monitoring and controlling the functions of the systematic approach • Improving evaluation processes (including learner performance) Testing or building learning or instructional theory by means of theory-based design within a systematic instructional model UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Basic Elements of ID Determining the needs of the learners and examining the learning context and environment Determining the outcomes of the learning program or course and formulating the learning objectives Developing appropriate and meaningful assessment criteria and procedures Establishing the most effective approach(es) to delivering the instruction UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Basic Elements of ID 5. Testing and evaluating the effectiveness of the instructional system (both the instruction itself and the performance of the learner) Implementing, adjusting and maintaining the instructional system UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Quality Assurance Model in ISD UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Analysis Collect all relevant information and then try to make sense of a variety of deficiencies, contradictions, inconsistencies and ambiguities Report on Goals Target Population Type of Training Alternatives UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Goals What instructional goal is driving this training? What is the skill gap? What competencies (knowledge, skills, or attitudes) will this program deliver? What factor or evaluation will be used to measure the level of goal achievement? UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Target Population Who will be trained? What is the estimated class size? How many students in each class will there be and how long will this training last? What are the knowledge and skill prerequisites, if any? UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Type of Training What types of media do we need? What instruments do we need to deliver this training? UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Alternatives What will happen if we do not deliver the training ? What are the restrictions or limitations for delivering this program? What other methods may be used to reach the goal (include limitations and advantages) ? UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Design: Instructional Strategy In a design process, instructional strategies determine the approach an instructor may take to achieve learning objectives. Organizational Strategies Delivery Strategies Management Strategies Questioning Strategies

Components of Instructional Strategies Organizational Strategies Delivery Strategies Management Strategies Macro strategies Scope and sequence structures Micro strategies Expanded instructional events Media selection Grouping strategies Scheduling Acqusition of resources

Expanded instructional events Introduction Body Conclusion Assessment Activate Attention Establish instructional purpose Arouse interest and motivation Preview lesson Recall prior knowledge Process information Focus attention Employ learning startegies Practice Evaluate feedback Summarize and review Transfer knowledge Remotivate and close Assess performance Evaluate feedback and remediate

Questioning strategies Application Questions Analytical Questions Synthesis Questions Interpretive Questions Evaluative Questions Application Questions: These questions ask learners to apply essential knowledge to new settings and contexts. For example: How could you apply these information search principles to your research? How could you demonstrate the use of this concept? How would you illustrate this process in action? What can we generalize from these facts? Analytical Questions: These questions ask learners to dissect key information and analyze essential concepts themes, and processes. For example: How are these search engines alike and different? What is an analogy that might represent this situation? How would you classify these information sources? What are the major elements that comprise this sequence of events? What are the major causes of this situation? Synthesis Questions: These questions require learners to formulate a holistic summary of key ideas, make inferences, or create new scenarios. For example: What would you define information literacy? What do you infer from such and such statements? Based upon these facts, what predictions would you make? Interpretive Questions: These are open-ended questions that require learners to formulate opinions in response to ideas presented in a print or non-print (e.g., art work, audio-visual) medium. Learners must support their opinions with direct evidence. Evaluative Questions: These questions require learners to formulate and justify judgments and criticisms based upon clearly-articulated evaluative criteria. For example: Why did you decide to choose that course of action? How would you rank these choices? How would you verify that conclusion?

Models of ISD An ISD model is a human construct to help us better understand real world systems. Therefore, instructional designers propose models to guide us develop and implement more effective instructional procedures in a specified span of time.

Models of ISD ADDIE: Core elements of ISD Dick and Carey Model Smith and Ragan Model Keller’s ARCS Model for motivation Reigeluth’s Elaboration Theory 4C/ID Model UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

ADDIE The ADDIE model is the generic process traditionally used by instructional designers and training developers. The five phases—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation—represent a dynamic, flexible guideline for building effective training and performance support tools .

Iterative Process of ADDIE Molenda, M. (2003).

Dick and Carey Model UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Smith and Ragan Model Source: Smith & Ragan, 1999 UNESCO Training the Trainers in Information Literacy Workshop September 3-5 Ankara Turkey

Keller's ARCS Model for Motivation Attention: Gaining and keeping the learner's attention. Keller's strategies for attention include sensory stimuli (as discussed previously), inquiry arousal (thought provoking questions), and variability (variance in exercises and use of media). Relevance: The training program should answer the critical question, "What's in it for me?" Benefits should be clearly stated. Confidence: The confidence aspect of the ARCS model is required so that students feel that they should put a good faith effort into the program. If they think they are incapable of achieving the objectives or that it will take too much time or effort, their motivation will decrease. In technology-based training programs, students should be given estimates of the time required to complete lessons or a measure of their progress through the program. Satisfaction: Learners must obtain some type of satisfaction or reward from the learning experience. This can be in the form of entertainment or a sense of achievement. Other forms of external rewards would include praise from a supervisor, a raise, or a promotion. Ultimately, though, the best way for learners to achieve satisfaction is for them to find their new skills immediately useful and beneficial on their job. Attention The first and single most important aspect of the ARCS model is gaining and keeping the learner's attention, which coincides with the first step in Gagne's model. Keller's strategies for attention include sensory stimuli (as discussed previously), inquiry arousal (thought provoking questions), and variability (variance in exercises and use of media). Relevance Attention and motivation will not be maintained, however, unless the learner believes the training is relevant. Put simply, the training program should answer the critical question, "What's in it for me?" Benefits should be clearly stated. For a sales training program, the benefit might be to help representatives increase their sales and personal commissions. For a safety training program, the benefit might be to reduce the number of workers getting hurt. For a software training program, the benefit to users could be to make them more productive or reduce their frustration with an application. A healthcare program might have the benefit that it can teach doctors how to treat certain patients. Confidence The confidence aspect of the ARCS model is required so that students feel that they should put a good faith effort into the program. If they think they are incapable of achieving the objectives or that it will take too much time or effort, their motivation will decrease. In technology-based training programs, students should be given estimates of the time required to complete lessons or a measure of their progress through the program. Satisfaction Finally, learners must obtain some type of satisfaction or reward from the learning experience. This can be in the form of entertainment or a sense of achievement. A self-assessment game, for example, might end with an animation sequence acknowledging the player's high score. A passing grade on a post-test might be rewarded with a completion certificate. Other forms of external rewards would include praise from a supervisor, a raise, or a promotion. Ultimately, though, the best way for learners to achieve satisfaction is for them to find their new skills immediately useful and beneficial on their job.

Reigeluth’s Elaboration Theory Step 1. Decompose the content into Concepts, Principles and Procedures Step 2. Sequence them according to their level of difficulty at macro level Step 3. Sequence them according to their level of difficulty at micro level Step 4. Provide comprehensive summaries Step 5. Provide opportunities for students to integrate new information with their schema (i.e., use analogies, mnemonics, diagrams, or concept maps). Step 6. Use encouragement verbs to motivate students’ efforts.

4C/ID Model 4C/ID is an instructional design model by van Merriënboer and others. "4C" means "four components", "ID" means "Instructional Design". It also can be found in Merril's first principles of instruction. 4C/ID is what I call a "main-stream" Instructional Design Model that addresses the issue of how to teach complex skills, i.e. solid know-how that can be applied to real problem problems. According to Martin Ryder, the The 4C-ID instructional model is characterized by four components: (1) Learning Tasks, (2) Supportive Information, (3) Procedural Information and (4) Part-Task Practice. The task are ordered by task difficulty and each task offers at the beginning a lot of scaffolding which is reduced as the learner progresses.

References Keller, J. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C.M.Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Kemp, J; G. Morrison & S. M. Ross. (1996). Desinging effective instruction. Prentice Hall. New Jersey Merrill, D. (2002). First Principles of Instruction, ETR&D, 50(3), pp. 43-59 Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive addie model. Performance improvement, 42(5), 34. Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. (Volume II). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Smith, P.L. & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional Design. 2nd edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill. van Merriënboer, J.J.G (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications