JCAB and FAA Joint Paper IP/12 UPR and PACOTS Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B-RNAV OPERATIONS IN EUROPEAN AIRSPACE
Advertisements

MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AIRSPACE (MNPS)
Toby Farmer, CAA New Zealand. 1995Worlds first operational use of CPDLC and ADS-C using datalink ACARS ANSPAirways New Zealand OperatorQantas.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues 30 Nautical Mile (NM) Lateral / Longitudinal Distance-based.
IP-20 Review of the Effectiveness of Branching UPRs from PACOTS Track 2 Electronic Navigation Research Institute The IPACG meeting 40, Sep. 2014, Washington.
Discussion of Issues regarding ARINC 424, 7.2.5
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group (CFCG) Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 – 06 February.
Week 8 Daily Geography.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.
Hershey Conference March 2008 Federal Aviation Administration 0 Hershey Conference March 2008 Federal Aviation Administration 0 Conducting Studies For.
Traffic Processing Sequence — Tactical and Strategic Investigation of all the facts pertaining to the Air Traffic Services tactical and strategic traffic.
Agenda Item 5: Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues WP- 06: Staged Implementation of an Unrestricted UPR Zone within Oakland Airspace (Presented by IATA)
Analysis of ATC Communication messages Relevant to Altitude Change Requests Electronic Navigation Research Institute IPACG/39, 5-6 February 2014, Fukuoka,
USING PBN in UPR APPLICATION, SUCCESS and LESSONS LEARNED
DARP.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Developing a Roadmap to Success What’s Needed to Support UPRs The 9 th Pacific Project Team Meeting.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2015 WP29: Speed Variation.
IP21 SIMULATION RESULT BY DARP FOR KSFO/KLAX (IPACG/40) ENRI.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP09: LOST FUEL SAVINGS DUE TO LACK OF.
Distance, Direction, and Latitude/Longitude
Polar Routes Polar Routes Conventional Routes Tokyo San Francisco
Presented to: Teterboro User Group By: Vincent Gerry Date: 18 January 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center CTA/FIR.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Gulf of Mexico 50 NM Lateral Separation – RNAV Routes Project Project Overview ATO Oceanic & Offshore.
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
Federal Aviation Administration Deepwater Horizon NOTAM Overview Air Traffic Organization System Operations Security Date: July 25, 2010.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues Summary of the Outcomes of the 17th Cross Polar Trans East.
Latitude and Longitude
Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness – In-Trail Procedure (ATSA-ITP)
FLIGHT OPERATIONS AND SPACE WEATHER MIKE STILLS MANAGER INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT DISPATCH 21JUNE11.
DM 4/4/02 Direct-To Controller Tool FAA/NASA Joint University Program Meeting NASA Ames Research Center April 4-5, 2002 Dave McNally Direct-To Project.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Aviation System Standards Flight Inspection Flight.
Rob Eagles Director ASIA PACIFIC Safety, Operations & Infrastructure.
FAA Anchorage ARTCC.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
20 In-Trail Climb experience and an airlines view of ASAS opportunities Captain Rocky Stone United Airlines Manager – Flight Systems Technology.
Federal Aviation Administration ASPIRE Update APEC TPT-WG Aviation Emissions Taskforce Singapore 15/16 Sept 09.
Situational Awareness Numerous aircraft and operational displays, when combined with effective and efficient communications and facilities, provide Air.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: 2008 US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Robert W. Reich, Asst Manager (Operations), Seattle.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2014 IP17: U.S. ADS-B Activities and Status.
Aim: How do maps help us navigate our way around the world?
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Operational impact of §
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C CDP Climb/Descend Procedure Implementation Project Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 –
NES TFR STEPS. What is NES? The NOTAM Entry System (NES) is an FAA program designed to simplify and expedite the TFR request process. By requesting a.
Federal Aviation Administration Clarification to Policy and Procedures Concerning Use of Airport Revenues; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel Presented.
Lecture 4: Global Positioning System (GPS)
1 Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) - Summary of simulations Joint ASAS-TN2/IATA/AEA workshop NLR, Amsterdam, 8 th October 2007 Chris Shaw.
Federal Aviation Administration APEC Seminar on Practical Measures to Manage Aviation Emissions Collaboration on Aviation Emissions Reduction Partnerships.
Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference By: Gordon Hayhoe, FAA AJP-6312, WJHTC Date: April 20, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration.
FAA Technical Support in the Asia Pacific January 14, 2004.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CFCG ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group IPACG/40 Keith Dutch, AJV September.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP06: ADS-B In-trail- Procedure (ITP)
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign.
15 ° N, 80 ° E India. 32 ° S, 20 ° E South Africa.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Record of Decision (ROD) Announcement Congressional Briefing Name: Steve Kelley Date: September 5, 2007 Federal.
IPACG/40 ASPIRE Update (IP11) September 10, 2014.
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
CPWG 16 NAV CANADA Update December 3-6,  Private, non-share capital company  2nd largest ANSP in the world  12 million aircraft movements annually.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2014 IP8: Lost Fuel Savings due to lack of RNP4/FANS Equipage.
UAS Operations in the Golden Triangle Mike Hainsey Executive Director Golden Triangle Regional Airport.
INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PLANNING
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Teterboro Runway 19 Quiet Visual Approach Teterboro Users Group (TUG) Gerald Lynch, Eastern Service.
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
New Automation System Delivers FANS-1/A Benefits
Status of Datalink Implementation in the Asia Pacific Region
FANS 1/A over Iridium (FOI)
Latitude and Longitude
Data Link Advanced Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan
Oceanic and International Operations
Presentation transcript:

JCAB and FAA Joint Paper IP/12 UPR and PACOTS Update

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 PACOTS Track F UPR Trial Operational Trial began July 25, 2013, to allow Track F UPRs at least 50nm south of PACOTS Tracks C & E. Remain 50nm South of Track E and Normal UPR Guidelines. Guidelines published in KZAK NOTAM A3212/13 and Oakland Website. 2

Federal Aviation Administration Merging PACOTS Tracks C and E

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Operational Trial March 13, 2013 began a 1 year operational trial of Merging Tracks C and E when it provided an advantage. 4

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Procedural Proposal This operational trial was a hybrid of different Pacific Oceanic Procedures. Allow the merging of PACOTS Tracks C and E in the Oakland or Anchorage FIRs when it provides a savings advantage. IPACG: Only merge PACOTS when there is at least a 200 lbs fuel savings. 5

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Track Advisory When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged; Track Advisory is used to manage the merging traffic at the point where the routes converged. service_units/enroute/oceanic/pacific_track_advisory 6

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Track Advisory When PACOTS Tracks C and E are not merged: –Oceanic Gateway Fix is the Start of the PACOTS Track as is currently done. When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged: –Oceanic Gateway Fix is the Merge point of Tracks C and E If the merge point is a Waypoint, that will be the Gateway Fix. If the merge point is a Lat/Long, the Gateway Fix for Track Advisory will be coded. –41W40 = 41N/140W The Latitude is always North and the leading 1 is dropped from the Longitude. 7

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks When Track C and E are merged, the TDM will have “RMK/MERGE USE (point) FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL” A0284/13 - (TDM TRK E BOXER FULMR FASEL 52N140W 55N150W 56N160W 56N170W ALDOZ ONEIL OPAKE OLCOT OPHET OGDEN OMOTO RTS/KSFO MOLEN BOXER KLAX RZS LIBBO BRINY BOARS BOXER OMOTO R580 OATIS RMK/MERGE USE ONEIL FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL). 8

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks A0284/13 - (TDM TRK E BOXER FULMR FASEL 52N140W 55N150W 56N160W 56N170W ALDOZ ONEIL OPAKE OLCOT OPHET OGDEN OMOTO RTS/KSFO MOLEN BOXER KLAX RZS LIBBO BRINY BOARS BOXER OMOTO R580 OATIS RMK/MERGE USE 52W40 FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL). 9

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Track Advisory Operators flight planning a merged Track C/E from the starting point would request a Gateway reservation (TKF) prior to 1650 UTC. 10

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Merged Track C and E Operational Trial 11 OF THE FIRST 38 DAYS OF THE OPERATIONAL TRIAL; TRACKS C & E MERGED 14 DAYS. AVERAGE FUEL SAVINGS PER FLIGHT WAS 1120 LBS (10 DAYS)

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties April 22-25, 2013 Oakland encountered difficulties with merging traffic on PACOTS Tracks C and E. There were numerous traffic conflictions that required Oakland to negotiate with Japan and Anchorage for the use of Non- standard altitudes. If traffic did not permit the use on Non- standard altitudes in Anchorage or Fukuoka FIRs, altitude assignments would have been significantly affected 12

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties On April 26, 2013, Oakland suspended the Operational Trial to merge PACOTS Tracks C and E. Oakland discovered several irregularities with the Track Advisory requested reservations: 13

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, /22-25 Track Advisory Issues 14

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Moving Forward C/E Trial 15 Operators must be better at meeting their Gateway Fix reservation times. Merging C/E requires the use of Non- Standard Altitudes. –Not an issue for NOPAC –Mix of Aircraft types –Gateway time errors

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Moving Forward C/E Trial 16 When the PACOTS Tracks C and E would merge, Oakland will coordinate with the next facility for the use of Non-Standard Altitudes for the next day. If approval for the use of the necessary Non-Standard altitudes can be obtained, the tracks will be published with a merge. If approval for the use of the necessary Non-Standard altitudes cannot be obtained, the tracks will be published without a merge in the Oakland FIR.

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation 17 ATOP ADS-C D50 30/30 FDP2000 NO ADS-C D50 30/30 Current Status ATOP ADS-C D50 30/30

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation 18 ATOP ADS-C D50 30/30 Most Tfc Low Tfc

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation 19 Island/Asia Tfc PACOTS Low Tfc

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation 20 ATOP ADS-C D50 30/30 D50 & 30/30 Planned

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Moving Forward C/E Trial 21 Tentative Resume Date 02/19/2014

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, ASIA PTRO UPRs JAPAN Australia UPRs ASIA NZ/NC UPRs

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, Westbound PACOTS Track B Track A Track K Track J Track I Track H Track F Track E Track C IPACG HAWAII JAPAN PACOTS UPRs IPACG TRACK K UPRs IPACG TRACK H/I UPRs IPACG TRACK F UPRs

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, PACOTS TRACK C/E MERGE Track E Track C

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, Track J Eastbound PACOTS Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 14 Track 15 Track 11 Track 12 IPACG JAPAN HAWAII PACOTS UPRs IPACG PACOT TRACK 14/15 UPRs IPACG PACOT TRACK 3 UPRs IPACG PACOT TRACK 1 UPRs Track 2

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Moving Forward C/E Trial 26

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014 Tahiti Auckland Nadi Brisbane Moresby Ujung ManilaManila Fukuoka Anchorage Vancouver Seattle Oakland Los Angeles MexicoMexico California – South Pacific Hawaii –South Pacific Asia–New Zealand/ Caledonia RJAA– Australia California Singapore Hawaii – PGUM/RPLL Asia - Hawaii Far East - California California – RTE Entry Pts. California – Hawaii (North of CEP) 1.09M. Kg An. 1017Kg Flight 9.61M Kg An ???? Kg An. 2.09M. Kg An. 2.88M. Kg An..266M. Kg An Kg An. ???? Kg An. 2.88M. Kg An. Over 32.8 Mil Kg Fuel Savings Annually UPRs Track 1 UPRs 10M. Kg An. 27

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5-6, 2014