Water Energy Nexus CPUC Cost Allocation Workshop Jarred Ross, Water Energy Nexus Program Manager May 4, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

The Regulatory Assistance Project 177 Water St. Gardiner, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
RGGI Draft Model Rule General Comments from Environment Northeast Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Stakeholder Meeting Hartford, CT May 2, 2006 Derek.
Making Clean Local Energy Accessible Now Storage Bid Evaluation Protocols Role of CEP, Quantifiable Benefits Stephanie Wang Policy Director Clean Coalition.
Yuji MIZUNO Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Baseline for Waste Management Project Regional Workshop in Asia on Capacity Development for the.
Paul A. Weghorst Executive Director of Water Policy
1 Total Resource Cost Effectiveness Test Utility Brown Bag Series by Tom Eckman, NWPCC Ken Keating, BPA October 4, 2006.
California Energy Commission Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments R Resource Adequacy Workshop January.
A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE COST- UTILITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL INTERVENTIONS Quality of improved life opportunities (QILO)
BASELINE POLICY FRAMEWORK Dina Mackin, CPUC Workshop on Energy Efficiency Baselines April 28, 2015 California Public Utilities Commission1.
Cost Allocation: Targeting Cost Effective Partnerships May 4, 2015.
CSEM Policy Conference Panel Discussion Utility Incentives and the Strategic Plan December 9, 2008 William C. Miller Manager, CEE Strategic Issues Pacific.
California’s Energy Efficiency Shareholder Incentive Mechanism CSEM Policy Conference December 9, 2008 Tom Roberts, Regulatory Analyst
OVERVIEW OF RPS CALCULATOR FUNCTIONALITY 1. Model Specification Model developed to provide plausible portfolios to CPUC LTPP and CAISO TPP to facilitate.
Renewable Net Short.
R Water-Energy Nexus Workshop on Cost Allocation May 4, 2015 Cynthia Mitchell, TURN Consultant.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
Energy efficiency cost-effectiveness CEC IEPR Workshop on 2030 Efficiency Goals July 6, 2015 Snuller Price.
Cost-Effectiveness and Solar Water Heating. 2 Why is it important to discuss cost- effectiveness (C-E) of SWH? C-E is a metric by which the CPUC will.
Cost-effectiveness Calculations for Water Savings Measures and Program in the IOU Energy Efficiency Portfolios: Added Considerations for “Embedded” Energy.
WATER ISSUES IN THE EASTERN EUROPE:
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 7/07/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
DRA Perspective on What Recycled Water Applications from Investor- Owned Utilities Should Contain and How They Should be Evaluated CPUC Water Recycling.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
California Energy Commission California Energy Demand Preliminary Electricity Forecast July 7, 2015 Chris Kavalec Energy Assessments Division.
Moldova Country Program Gretel Gambarelli World Bank Chisinau, 28 October 2009.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Research and Development Helps CA Prepare for a Future of Drought Laurie ten Hope Deputy Director Energy.
Weathering the Change Action Plan 2 ACT Climate Change Council 8 November 2011.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
1 Energy Efficiency : Why California Needs a Strategic Paradigm Shift August 2011.
Local and Regional Govt Programs Jeremy Battis Regulatory Analyst, Energy Division May 7, 2015 Existing Buildings Energy Efficiency Workshop California.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
1 California Solar Initiative Low Income Multifamily Program Public Workshop March 17, 2008 San Francisco, CA.
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Offshore Technology Transfer Workshop Shell, GCEAG, API, Rice University and EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program June.
© OECD/IEA 2011 Energy Efficiency in Central Asia: Challenges and Opportunities VII KAZENERGY EURASIAN FORUM World in Transition Shaping Sustainable Energy.
LIOB Meeting 6/5/20081 CPUC Issues Impacting Low Income Community Climate Change Activities: Policy & Planning Division anticipates issuance in July 2008.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
Avoided Cost Calculator Workshop Day 2 October 4, 2005 Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc.
Summary of the current California Public Utilities Commission Energy Efficiency Proceeding (R ) Coordination with UC Davis Center for Water and.
Cost Benefit Analysis Costs Administration Equipment Incentives
Senior Design Fall 2014 ECE Department and Center for Clean Energy Engineering Emily Simonelli Lindsay Sullivan Taniya Singh United Illuminating in Orange,
Ice Storage for Peak Load Reduction Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2005 San Diego Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Gas Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Senate Energy Committee Hearing.
1 Commissioner Catherine Sandoval California Public Utilities Commission August 28, 2015 Joint Agency Workshop on California’s Drought.
Experience you can trust. Californial Industrial Energy Efficiency Potential CALMAC/MAESTRO Meeting San Francisco, CA July 27, 2006 Fred Coito
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Energy Savings Assistance Program And California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) Program Proposed Decision.
CD for CDM - Second National Workshop on Baselines (Phase II) Cairo, March 31 & April 1, 2004 Baseline for wind energy project in Tunisia Second National.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Energy Balancing Credit Variation Proposal Modification 0233 Transmission Work Stream 5th March 2009 Mark Cockayne.
Missouri Public Service Commission Workshop on EPA’s Clean Power Plan February 4, 2016 Andy Knott Sierra Club Beyond Coal Campaign
2016 LTSA Update Doug Murray 6/21/2016. Agenda Introduction Scenario Retirement Process Scenario Summary Results Appendix.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
Integrated Capacity Analysis Working Group June 9, am – 12 pm CPUC Golden Gate Hearing Room drpwg.org.
Georgy TAVADZE Chairman Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission (GNERC) Budapest, Hungary April 14, th Annual Meeting of the Energy Regulators.
South East Europe Regional Consultation Meeting Bucharest, Romania 6 – 7 October 2016 Session II: Opportunities and Challenges in RE Deployment in the.
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
2016 EM&V Roadmap Update Emerging Technologies Program chapter
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Introduction to Growth Scenario Working Group
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Presentation transcript:

Water Energy Nexus CPUC Cost Allocation Workshop Jarred Ross, Water Energy Nexus Program Manager May 4, 2015

Question 1&2: How should we allocate W-E program costs and savings credit? What factors should be considered in determining cost allocations? Program costs and savings credits should be allocated in proportion to the accrual of benefits to water and energy ratepayers. The actual water capacity source per hydrologic region should be used to calculate avoided water capacity costs in order to ensure that budget allocations reflect actual avoided water capacity costs rather than default values. Cross subsidies between the two sectors should be minimized or eliminated to the extent possible by aligning budget allocations to the amount of benefits realized by water and energy ratepayers. The standard methodology (similar to what the IOU’s adopted) to allocate budgets for EE measures between electric and gas should apply.

Question 3: Does the cost-effectiveness model provide sufficient information to support anticipated cost allocation processes?

4 CityGross Measure CostkWh SavingskW SavingsTRC City 1 $15, City 2 $34, City 3 $20, City 4 $28, City 5 $27, TOTAL $126, , ScenarioGallons of Water Saved Avoided IOU Electric Energy Cost (2014$) Avoided Water Capacity Cost (2014$) Combined Total Resource Cost Test City 1530,000 $1, $18, City 221,550,000 $56, $756, City 311,040,000 $29, $387, City 48,410,000 $22, $295, City 5530,000 $1, $18, TOTAL42,060,000 $110,720.36$1,475, Water Loss Cost Effectiveness Using CPUC-Navigant Draft Calculator Example: SCE’s Water Leak Detection Pilot: E3 EE Model vs. W-E Cost Effectiveness Model (w/o allocation of budget costs)

Question 4: Does the ongoing drought impact cost allocations? The current drought could impact the cost allocation if the following occur: Cost of water commodity changes (recycled water cost reduction, not likely but it is possible) Cost of avoided energy changes (rate increases, distributed generation implementation, fuel-switching, etc.) Political considerations and impacts on efforts to save water. High societal benefits might be considered in extreme drought conditions. Potential of decreased emphasis on the use of economic theory to determine budget allocations due to drought conditions.