Educator Evaluation and Support System Model Refinements 2015-16 School Year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Advertisements

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.
What do you already know about rubrics? What do you want to know?
Texas Evaluation and Support System
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Applying Assessment to Learning
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Trust Cooperation Ambitiousness Diligence Satisfaction Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control 7Cs ComponentsEngagement Targets.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Should Students Have A Voice?
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
Mentor Teacher Program Collegial Support through Learning-Focused Relationships September 18, 2013.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Lori Cameron from the WI RtI Center/ PBIS Network TALK.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
The Importance of High Expectations Oregon GEAR UP Professional Development for Educators.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) Refresher Training Fall 2017.
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Educator Evaluation and Support System Model Refinements School Year

2 Goals for Model Refinements:  Make the scoring approach more transparent-move away from the matrix  Put a greater emphasis on practice  Reduce the weight of student learning  Place greater value on the Professional Growth Goal (PGG) Goals of Refinements

3 Scoring Approach Feedback from both evaluators and teachers regarding the matrix:  Not transparent  No specific weights can be assigned  Difficult to understand

4 Model Refinement:  All educator evaluation systems in RI will use a points system  The points will range from points  Scoring bands will determine the Final Effectiveness Rating (FER) Scoring Approach

5 Feedback from both evaluators and teachers regarding weights:  A greater emphasis needs to be placed on professional practice  Student learning should be reduced System Weights

6 Model Refinement: System Weights

7 Professional Practice: Classroom Environment 25% 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 2d: Managing Student Behavior Professional Practice: Instruction 25% 3a: Communicating with Students 3b: Using Questioning/Prompts and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction RI Model Specific Refinements

8 Professional Responsibilities Refinements:  Rubrics are now based on 4 levels  An additional component was added to include scoring the Professional Growth Goal RI Model Specific: Professional Responsibilities

9 RI Model Specifics: Professional Practice RI Teacher Model Points Classroom EnvironmentInstructionStudent LearningProfessional Responsibilities 25% of 400 points 30% of 400 points20% of 400 points 100 points total 120 points total80 points total Component SumPointsWeighted PointsComponent SumPointsWeighted PointsSLO CombinationPointsWeighted PointsComponent Sum Points Weighted Points Exceeded (4) Exceeded (4) Exceeded (4) Met (3) Met (3) Met (3) Exceeded (4) Nearly Met (2) Met (3) Nearly Met (2) Exceeded (4) Not Met (1) Nearly Met (2) Nearly (2) Met (3) Not Met (1) Nearly Met (2) Not Met (1) Not Met (1) Not Met (1)