Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Give an Effective 2ar. 1. Think About the Big Picture  Remember: focus on offense – defend your house  Isolate 1 or 2 Impacts  Decide on impacts.
Advertisements

(Counter) Plans Because they didn’t limit the topic.
Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
 The plan says “United States”. The CP replaces that with the word “global” and the net benefit is a critique of ethno-centrism.  2AC says “perm: do.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Mike Shackelford. Factors that make a good counterplan Does it solve the aff better? Is it competitive Does it solve the aff or a portion of the aff.
Advanced cp competition exercises
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
2012 GMU Patriot Debate Institute. What is states cp?  Fiats the 50 states governments/Washington D.C./relevant territories to do plan action.  Variations.
TOPICALITY Where debate begins.
Answering Counterplans  Acronym is PLOTS  Permutation  Links to their disads  Other disads to the Counterplan  Theory Objections  Doesn’t Solve the.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Affirmative’s Worst Nightmare.
Introduction to Kritiks Ryan Galloway Samford University.
PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.  Cp text  Net benefit  Must be competitive ◦ Uniquely beneficial ◦ Mutually exclusive.
DISADVANTAGES. What is a Disadvantage?  Disadvantages are offcase positions that the negative advances to prove that the costs of the plan outweigh its.
Debating Case and Disadvantages CODI 2014 Lecture 1.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
 A counterplan is a competitive policy option to the affirmative plan.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
Counterplan Lecture GDI 2013 Austin Layton Note: This PowerPoint can be accessed on the PaDS website.
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
Counterplans?. Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions.
Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.
Alejandres Gannon UC Berkeley.  The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the.
Intro to Critiques. Fiat The assumption in the debate game that we pretend the plan gets passed by the USFG. Then, we can debate out the Costs (DA’s)
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Counterplans on the Topic The Honorable James R. Stevenson, Ph.D, J.D., M.D., Th.D., A.F., A.D.N.
Debate should be a means of significantly improving one's education through analytical development and extension of advocacy positions. The negative strategy.
And other things… DISADVANTAGES. BUT FIRST, LETS REVIEW FOR THE QUIZ The quiz on Wednesday will be open note and will cover the two primary topics and.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.
INTRO TO COUNTERPLANS!. WHAT IS A CP? A net beneficial alternative proposal to the Plan Competitive with the Plan Strategic if… The Aff is huge The SQ.
Theory Debating Baxter MDAW  It Really is  There are 4 Components of a Theory Argument  Interp  Violation  Standards  Voting Issue  You.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
Getting Started in CX Debate Julian Erdmann. What is CX debate? Team debate made up by two students from the same school. They will defend either Affirmative.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
Disadvantages “Advanced” theory.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards & Russell Kirkscey June 2015.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.
The Counterplan. A counterplan is a policy defended by the negative team which competes with the affirmative plan and is, on balance, more beneficial.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
The Politics DA.
Basics of Debate Damien Debate.
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Debate What is Debate?.
The 2AC: Answering Disads
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Plans in LD No Limits Debate Camp.
Topicality Casey Parsons.
Introduction to the Neg
Presentation transcript:

Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2

What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative can choose to do whatever they want, but it must be competitive with the affirmative In order to be competitive there must be a disadvantage to doing both the affirmative and the negative together (permutation)

Competition Comes from Net Benefits Usually DA’s or case turns that link to the affirmative plan but not the counterplan Fast Food example

Why Counterplan? To eliminate consideration of the aff advantages More realistic to offer a better way of doing things Time

Types of Counterplans Agent Counterplans – Have a different actor do the same thing as the aff – Sometimes difficult because a good aff will find something only the resolutional agent can do Need to always have a warrant why your actor is best in the 1AC NOAA regulations key/off shore wind done in federal waters

Types of Counterplans Advantage Counterplans – Do something else to solve some or all of the aff harms – Vs wind- a different energy source – Vs fisheries- only allow fisheries on land – Solve just one advantage- i.e. do something to solve for global warming

PIC Out of PIC= Plan Inclusive Counterplan Do all of the plan except… – Change the wording of the plan – Exclude some state or area from the plan effects Implement the wind plan except in waters off of x state – The goals is to do as much as the aff as possible with a DA to the one thing you change

Conditions CP Only do the plan if x happens Consult NATO or a country Spending conditions

Delay Counterplans Do the plan at some later date Usually after the Disad- i.e. after the midterms

What is wrong with some of these counterplans They are probably cheating The closer to the affirmative the CP is (i.e. the more the plan it does) the harder it is for the affirmative to answer it Good for the negative, bad for the affirmative

Answering Counterplans Permutations Offense Solvency Deficits Theory

Permutations

Combination of the plan and the counterplan Should include all of the plan and parts of the counterplan Perm do both- all of the plan and all of the counterplan is the most common form Should be your first answer to most CPs

Permutations Instrinsicness Permutations – Adds something to the plan and counterplan that is not in either Timeframe Permutations – Do the plan and then the counterplan or do the counterplan and then the plan Severance Permutations – Eliminates part of the plan

Point of the Permutation To show the counterplan is not competitive It should solve all of the affirmative advantages and the negative disadvantages associated with the plan This will also be true for permutations of kritiks

Offense A turn or disadvantage to the CP VS states cp- state spending DA Reason why the counterplan action would make things worse

Solvency You must make an argument why the CP does not solve all or some of the aff If you do not then any risk of the negative disadvantage means you lose Most solvency deficits are built into the 1ac- a good 2ac will make several solvency deficit arguments relying on 1AC evidence alone

Theory The negative’s counterplan is cheating Status of the counterplan What the Counterplan Does

Status of the Counterplan Conditional – The negative can kick it at any time/the status quo is always an option Kick it? WTH does that mean?

Status of the Counterplan Dispositional – The negative can only kick the counterplan if there is a permutation or other relevant theoretical objection. Unconditional – The negative cannot kick the counterplan

What the Counterplan Does Fiat Abuse – Multiple Actors

Fiat Abuse Does something nobody writes about Uses an international agent

PICS Steal Aff ground Artificially competitive Impossible to debate fairly