Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q UANTUM S PLITTING by Robert Nemiroff Michigan Technological University.
Advertisements

Chapter 8 Companion site for Light and Video Microscopy Author: Wayne.
Interferometry It deals with experimental study of the phenomenon of interference. Instruments used in this study are based on principle of interference.
The Physics of Spin Otto Stern Walther Gerlach 1922: Wrong theory
What really happens upon quantum measurement?[n eeds revision] References are more fully listed in my Phys Rev A paperPhys Rev A paper Art Hobson Prof.
Hands-On Quantum Uncertainty. Quantum uncertainty is present in the diffraction, polarization and interference of light.
Quantum Control of Wave- Particle Duality Robert Mann D. Terno, R. Ionicioiu, T. Jennewein.
Durham University – Atomic & Molecular Physics group
Speed of Light How fast is the speed of light? –depends on material: – in vacuum, c = 3 x 10 8 m/s What is this speed relative to? What is the speed of.
Angular momentum of the photon – experimental proposal J erzy Kosek, Poland 1.Introduction 2.Linear and angular momentum of the photon. 3.Measurement of.
Quantum Mechanics 102 Tunneling and its Applications.
If is an element of reality then If then is an element of reality For dichotomic variables:
Wave functions of Baryons. Baryon Magnetic Moments Baryon masses. Need to explain Parity and Charge Conjugation.
Quantum Key Establishment Wade Trappe. Talk Overview Quantum Demo Quantum Key Establishment.
OPT OPT 253 Quantum Optics Laboratory, Final Presentation Wednesday, December 10 th 2008 By Carlin Gettliffe.
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
Quantum Cryptography Prafulla Basavaraja CS 265 – Spring 2005.
Quantum Computing Marek Perkowski Part of Computational Intelligence Course 2007.
Lecture 5 -- Some more thoughts on “Double Slit Experiment” Young carried out his original double-slit experiment with light some time in the first decade.
Dr. Michael Cooke Dr. David Schmitz Fermilab. Newton’s Laws of Motion o o 1. Objects in motion want to stay in motion and objects at rest want to stay.
Quiz Not graded 2. Speed of light and distance to Sun If the speed of light is 300,000 km/sec, and it takes light 8 minutes to reach Earth from.
Modern Optics IV-coherence Special topics course in IAMS Lecture speaker: Wang-Yau Cheng 2006/4.
Lecture 3 Need for new theory Stern-Gerlach Experiments Some doubts Analogy with mathematics of light Feynman’s double slit thought experiment.
Quantum Physics Mathematics. Quantum Physics Tools in Real Life Reality.
1 PH604 Special Relativity (8 lectures) Books: “Special Relativity, a first encounter”, Domenico Giulini, Oxford “Introduction to the Relativity Principle”,
Slide 2-1 Lecture Outline Chapter 2 Motion in One Dimension © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
It’s all done with Mirrors Many of the predictions of quantum mechanics are verified with ordinary matter particles (like electrons), but these experiments.
Quantum Cryptoanalysis and Quantum Cryptography (An introduction)
PRESENTED BY MIDHUN.T - EC 3 - S 61 TOPIC – QUANTUM TELEPORTATION Presented by - MIDHUN T EC 3, S 6 ROLL NO. 20 Reg no
Quantum Computing Paola Cappellaro
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Decoherence Demo (with 2-slit interference demo) Scott Johnson Intel Press Play to begin.
Quantum Computing by Mathew Ross Jared Davis - Group L -
Quantum Two 1. 2 More About Direct Product Spaces 3.
Physics 2170 – Spring Some interesting aspects of quantum mechanics The last homework is due at 12:50pm.
Quantum interferometric visibility as a witness of general relativistic proper time Bhubaneswar, 21 st December 2011 M. Zych, F. Costa, I. Pikovski, Č.
Dr. Michael Cooke Dr. David Schmitz Fermilab
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 9. Wave-Particle Duality of Light 9.1 What is a Photon ? Whether light consists of particles or waves ? - ~1700,
Arrangement of Electrons in Atoms 4-2 The Quantum Model of the Atom.
Electrons as waves Scientists accepted the fact that light has a dual wave- particle nature. De Broglie pointed out that in many ways the behavior of the.
River Dell Regional High School Unit 3 – Electron Configurations Part C: Quantum Mechanical Model.
Fundamental Physics II PETROVIETNAM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES Vungtau, 2013 Phamj Hong Quang
Fourier Transform IR Spectroscopy. Absorption peaks in an infrared absorption spectrum arise from molecular vibrations Absorbed energy causes molecular.
The Birthday Problem. The Problem In a group of 50 students, what is the probability that at least two students share the same birthday?
Basic Concepts Absolute Size The Superposition Principle Copyright – Michael D. Fayer, 2007 Size Classical MechanicsQuantum Mechanics RelativeAbsolute.
Chapter 9 Spin. Total angular momentum Let us recall key results for the total angular momentum 6.B.2 6.C.1.
Quantum Mechanics 102 Tunneling and its Applications.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Schematic diagram of computer-aided Mach–Zehnder interferometer; laser beam.
Metrology and integrated optics Geoff Pryde Griffith University.
Michelson Morley experiment. Introduction: The Michelson–Morley experiment was performed in 1887 by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at Western Reserve.
The meaning of weak value
Measurement and Expectation Values
Presented By: Muhammad Imran PhD student (PIEAS)
PHY 741 Quantum Mechanics 12-12:50 PM MWF Olin 103 Plan for Lecture 1:
Quantum Mechanics.
Chemistry 271 – Quantum Mechanics
THEORIES OF LIGHT Is light a wave or a stream of particles?
Quantum Teleportation
Unit 3 – Electron Configurations Part C: Quantum Mechanical Model
MICHELSON INTERFEROMETER

Quantum Technology programme
Distance Time Graphs and Probability
Total Energy is Conserved.
Length Contraction © D Hoult 2011.
Quantum Theory Electrons!.
Wave Vocabulary.
Consider a potential energy function as shown here.
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Info State 1 P State 0 P Beam splitter P Quantum Particle Two possible states: 1 or 0 (polarization, spin, …) Beam splitter A State 1 P Detection of the state by a beam splitter Beam splitter B P Illustrates the two possible instates by two different inpath A and B State 0

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Double Beam Splitter P Particle S1 – S4 Half-silvered mirror S2 – S3 Fully silvered mirror Y p34 X S3 A particle P is coming in path A or B. At the half-silvered mirror S1 it’s 50/50 percent chance that the particle will go through the mirror and travel the path p12 or be reflected and travel the path p13. The mirrors S2 and S3 are fully silvered so the particle is reflected and travel the path p24 or p34. At the half-silvered mirror S4 or be reflected and travel the path X or Y. S4 p13 p24 S1 P S2 A p12 B

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Classical Particle An experiment with a classical particle P. At the moment we have the following situation: 19 particles have travelled the path p12 – p24. 18 particles have travelled the path p13 – p34. 17 particles have travelled the path X. 19 particles have travelled the path Y. Ordinary statistical theory tells us that there will be 50/50 percent of particles travelling the path p12 - p24 or p13 - p34. There will be 50/50 percent of particles travelling the path X or Y. Y p34 X P p13 p24 A p12 B 0.25 p12 X 0.5 0.5 0.25 Y 0.5 A 0.25 X 0.5 p13 0.25 Y

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Result An experiment with a quantum particle P. At the moment we have the following situation: 34 particles have been travelling out the path X. 0 particles have been travelling out the path Y. Quantum theory tells us the following: If the quantum particle is starting in the path A, then every particle will be travelling the out-path X. If the quantum particle is staring in the path B, then every particle will be travelling the out-path Y. Y P X A P B This result is very surprising compared to classical physics. How to explain this?

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Measurement An experiment with a quantum particle P. Now we have a measuring instrument to detect which path the quantum particle is travelling. At the moment we have the following situation: 22 particles have been travelling the out-path X. 22 particles have been travelling the out-path Y. Quantum theory tells us the following: If we have a measuring instrument (either in only one or both path) to detect which path the quantum particle is travelling, then the detection ’disturbs’ the quantum effect in such a way that now we will have an equal number of particles travelling in path X or Y. Y P X A B Measuring instrument How to explain this?

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Two orthonormal states An experiment with a quantum particle P. There are two possible initial states u1 and u2 for the particle P dependent of the in-path A or B. Let these two possible instates be: A: u1 = [1,0] B: u2 = [0,1] These two states are orthonormal. A P B

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path A - State after 1 beam splitter An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the state u1 or state u2. The Hadamard matrix (operator) is shown in the figure. Operator Hadamard matrix

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path A - State after 1 beam splitter - Reality / Mathematical Space Reality Mathematical Space P P P

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path A - State after 2 beam splitters An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the state u1 or state u2. The Hadamard matrix (operator) is shown in the figure. Y P P X Operator Hadamard matrix P A B

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path A - State after 2 beam splitters - Reality / Mathematical Space Reality Mathematical Space

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path B - State after 1 beam splitter An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u2. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the state u1 or state u2. The Hadamard matrix (operator) is shown in the figure. Operator Hadamard matrix A B

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path B - State after 1 beam splitter - Reality / Mathematical Space Reality Mathematical Space P P P

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Path B - State after 2 beam splitters An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the state u1 or state u2. The Hadamard matrix (operator) is shown in the figure. Y P P X Operator Hadamard matrix P A B

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State B - State after 2 beam splitters - Reality / Mathematical Space Reality Mathematical Space

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Hadamard Operator Beam splitter 1 Beam splitter 2 Hadamard operator rotates the state vector 450 counterclockwise

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Detector An experiment with a quantum particle P. We have one or two detectors to detect the travelling path p12 or p13 of the particle. p13 A p12 P B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Approaching the detector(s) An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to detect the particle either in the path p12 or p13. The particle is approaching the detector(s). Operator Hadamard matrix p13 A p12 B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Particle is detected in path p12 An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to detect the particle in the path p12 or p|3. Now the particle is detected in the path p12. The detection of the particle force the particle into one of the eigenstates (here u2) of the detection operator P. p34 p13 p24 A p12 B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Particle deteced in path p12 approaching beam splitter S2 An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the path p12 or path13. The detector has detected the particle in path p12. The particle is now in state u2 and approaches the second beam splitter S4. p34 p13 p24 A p12 B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Particle detected in path p12 passing beam splitter S4 An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure The particle has been detected in path p12 and forced into state u2. After passing the second beam splitter it’s equalt probability to detect the particle in path X or path Y. Y p34 X p13 p24 A p12 B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Detector in path p12, but no detection there An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in path p12 or p13. Detector in path p12, but no detection there. Anyway the detector change the state and the particle is forced into one of the eigenstate of detection operator P (here u1). p34 p13 p24 A p12 B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Detector in path p12 ,no detection there - Approaching beam splitter S4 An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in path p12 or p13. Detector in path p12, but no detection there. Anyway the detector change the state and the particle is forced into one of the eigenstate of detection operator P (here u1). The particle is approaching the second beam splitter S4. P A B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Detector in path p12, no detection there - Passing beam splitter S4 An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the path p12 or p13. Detector in path p12, but no detection there. Particle is forced in into state u1 and equal probability in path X og Y after second beam splitter. Y X A B Detector

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - State A - Approaching the detector(s) An experiment with a quantum particle P. The particle P starts in the state u1 or u2. The beam splitter is represented mathematically by an operator called the Hadamard matrix. After the beam splitter (mirror) we have equal probability to measure the particle either in the state u1 or state u2. The particle is approaching the detector(s). Operator Hadamard matrix p13 A p12 B Detector There is no possibility to decide if the particle is coming from A or B using a detector in the path p12 or p13 after the first beam splitter S1. We have to let the particle be undisturbed until passing the second beam splitter S4. Equal probability for detecting particle in path p12 or p13 independent of particle in-path A or B.

Quantum Physics Mach-Zehnder Interferometer Quantum Particle - Conclusion X X S4 S4 Operator Hadamard matrix P P S1 S1 A A P B B P Let the particle be undisturbed between beam splitter S1 and S2. Detect the particle after beam splitter S2. The particle out-path is X if in-path is A. The particle out-path is Y if in-path is B.