Session 6 Common Problems Associated with Writing Learning Outcomes Comments from your reports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
Quality Assurance at the Language Centre: An on- going Journey Khalid Al Kaabi Sarah Khan Pooja Sancheti.
Curriculum Design: The Basics 25 September 2012 Nicolene Murdoch Executive Director: Teaching, Learning & Quality Monash South Africa.
Creating the Annual Comprehensive School Counseling Program (CSCP)Plan
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
Let Quality Guide Evaluation Quality: Recent Trends Implemented in the Middle East An Eclectic Approach to Evaluation for Higher Education Institutions:
Qualitative KPI + Rubric LO  LO  Gastrointestinal system, medical graduates will be able to safely demonstrate the following four procedures. KPI KPI.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment April 19, 2008.
Launch of Quality Management System
How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
The Modernisation of Higher Education Introduction to LOLA methodology Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Learning outcomes and introduction to assessment Pg Certificate in Higher Education Professional Practice Jannie Roed and Sue Moron-Garcia 6 th May 2009.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments Oct 2013.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
WesternU Assessment Kick-off Meeting: The why’s, who’s, what’s, how’s, and when’s of assessment Institutional Research & Effectiveness Neil M. Patel, Ph.D.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Outcomes-Based Programme Development and Quality Assurance at Masaryk University1 Outcomes-Based Programme Development and Quality Assurance at Masaryk.
Creating Rubrics. Information taken from Formative Assessment and Standards-Based Grading Robert Marzano 2010.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions April 1-3, 2009 Sinaia Mapping Learning.
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments May 2013.
Florida Education Center Tallahassee, Florida December 3, 2003 Dr. R. E. LeMon Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs 1 Florida Board of Governors.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Student Outcomes Assesment for CTE Programs. Student Outcomes Assessment and Program Review  In 2004, the Program Review process was redesigned based.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
Writing Learning Outcomes: common problems and lessons learnt Joan Smith Director of Undergraduate Studies Edinburgh College of Art.
What is Standards Based Grading? SBG is the grading of assignments based on evidence of specific academic criteria directly linked to the learning standards.
Evaluating Student Presentations Speaking Intensive Workshop.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
COLLEGE OF APPLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES “CAMS” NOVEMBER 2015 Vice -Deanship for Development and Quality November 2015.
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO 2006/ Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET-PIU.
" NCAAA ACTIVITY" PRESENT STATUS & FUTURE PLAN
Course File seminar NCAAA SSR Preparation (3rd dec 2015)
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #2: Writing SLOs Office of Academic Planning & Accountability Institutional Effectiveness Moderator: Dr. Cathy.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
Monitoring, Annual Review & Enhancement
Student Learning outcomes assessment
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
CEA Case Study Marianne Farrugia.
Director of Quality and Educational Development
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
A five-year community effort to improve geoscience literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports.
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
External Examiner Reports
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
External Examiner Briefing: Report Writing 22 January
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Presentation transcript:

Session 6 Common Problems Associated with Writing Learning Outcomes Comments from your reports

Common Problems : 1.Language is too vague or too specific for course level 2.Use of unclear words and phrases 3.There are too many learning outcomes 4.There are too many verbs in one learning outcome 5. Overuse of the same verb 6.Inappropriate cognitive level 7.Use of progression 8.Learning outcomes are not realistic 9.Learning outcomes that are not, or cannot be, assessed

Course Constructive Alignment Template Intended Learning Outcomes AssessmentTeaching & Learning Activities On successful completion of the course, the student should be able to: Continuous Assessment? Percentage % Final Examination – Format? % Pass Standard Penalties Total grade Assessments types Rubrics What will the students do to learn? Teaching methods Class activities

Eligibility requirements for NCAAA academic Acc. 1.Program authorized 2.Eligibility application 3.Program specification (report template) 4.Course specification (sample of 3 CS from each level) 5.Description of the course, program requirements and regulations 6.Annual course (sample) 7.Program reports (last two years repots) 8.Student evaluation survey results (repot) 9.Graduated students, evaluations available (report) 10.Program advisory committees (report + sample) 11.Indicators and benchmarks (report) 12.Consistency with qualifications framework (report) 13.Self evaluation scales (template) 14.Self study report (template) 15.Strategic Plan (College/ Program+ Institutional) 16.Strategic plan for Quality Assurance (summary concern each Program)

The most important comments on Learning and Teaching 1.It is important to elaborate more with clear evidence and report about how the Program achieved the Learning Outcomes at courses level and Program level. 2.Sub-standards are need more clarifications with additional discussions and evaluation and should contain a summary concerning each Program. Clarify the use of KPIs with benchmarking and analysis. It is important to link the discussion with suitable and updated evidences and these evidences should be reported with specific details in the SSR. 3.KPIs ’ information which reflects the success of the learning outcomes of the Programs should be reported in details. 4.Programs should provide detailed report about benchmarks. Which KPIs were being utilized in this benchmarks process? 5.Sub-standards 4.1, the overall Program learning outcomes should be consistent with the NQF.

6.Subsection 4.6 Quality of Teaching: Updated evidence is required on quality of teaching. 7.Reports on Employer Survey and Alumni Survey analysis are required. 8.Results and statistics for Student Survey, Course Evaluation Surveys, Students Experience Surveys, Alumni and graduates Surveys and Employers Survey are required and should reported in details. 9.The updated Program Five Year Plan must be enclosed with this SSR as evidence and a point of reference. 10.Using the NCAAA KPI ’ s for standard (4) is highly recommended.

Conclusion Thank you for your time and reflections Dr. Gregory J. Maffet Dr. Nasser M. Sarhan