InfluenceMap.org Objective, neutral analysis of corporate influence on climate policy February 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.

Advertisements

Developing Substance Misuse Education in the Borders.

Unique value proposition/why do we need this? KM and Comms work is key for reaching CRP outcomes & impact M & E of our work will help us learn to be more.

Parents as Partners in Education

Rachael Marshman Track Progress Across the New Curriculum.

SAI Performance Measurement Framework

Progress Toward Impact Overall Performance Study of the GEF Aaron Zazueta GEF Evaluation Office Hanoi, March 10, 2010.

The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.

Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,

1 Katherine Sierra Vice President, Sustainable Development Network The World Bank April 14, 2008 Proposed Climate Investment Funds (CIFs) Recap.

1 Statewide Assessment Elements of a Successful Statewide Assessment.

Lessons Learned for Strong Project Delivery & Reporting Sheelagh O’Reilly, Kristin Olsen IODPARC Independent Assessors for the Scottish Government IDF.

Strategic Human Resource Management

Analysis of Local Integrated Workforce Strategies Paul Gutherson Research Consultant CfBT Education Trust.

Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Integrated Commissioning Unit.

SoE Reporting in Scotland Scotland’s Environment Web LIFE Project Joanna Muse Principal.

Basic Definitions and Drivers (Sustainability Reporting) Introduction and scene setting.

Programs of the Intel Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

Feasibility Study of a Wiki Collaboration Platform for Systematic Review Eileen Erinoff AHRQ Annual Meeting September 15, 2009.

Qualifications Update: Environmental Science Qualifications Update: Environmental Science.

What makes a successful development project? Kristin Olsen IOD PARC

Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics LMI Framework Launch 9 th March 2012 Euan Smith.

Environmental Business Support in the UK : Providing Added Value to Business Progress Towards Sustainability? Frances Hines BRASS Cardiff University.

Crossing Methodological Borders to Develop and Implement an Approach for Determining the Value of Energy Efficiency R&D Programs Presented at the American.

Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health

1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,

Involve Conference - People in Research 6 th September 2006 How can Social Care Online and the new National Social Care Research Register contribute to.

Corporate Social Responsibility LECTURE 25: Corporate Social Responsibility MGT

The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.

Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.

Insert Nonprofit Logo Project Name Discovery Presentation.

Skills for evidence-informed practice: Interactive workshop Dartington Hall, Devon 2 April 2009.

Domain Modeling In FREMA Yvonne Howard David Millard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.

Economic and Political Risk Evaluator World class economic and political risk expertise OXFORD ECONOMICS AND CONTROL RISKS.

Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.

Needs for changes and adjusting to them in the management of statistical systems Panel discussion Prospects and Risks for the Future: How to manage uncertainties.

Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission

UNSD Recent international developments in Energy Statistics.

PHE portal update Anne Brice Mahesh Patel. PHE portal Progress so far Relationship between AKM and Online Services workstreams Engaging with content users.

Module 7- Evaluation: Quality and Standards. 17/02/20162 Overview of the Module How the evaluation will be done Questions and criteria Methods and techniques.

Planning for Success Module Eight. Reflecting on the Previous Session What was most useful from the previous session? What progress have you made since.

Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams Summer 2015.

DFID Climate Change Implementation Strategy NGO Consultation INTRODUCTIONDFID AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

Fire & Rescue Service CAA and Improvement Sharon Gernon-Booth Fire and rescue services PIN 23 March 2009.

EFQM Excellence Model and EFQM Community of Practice for Police Forces and Services Vilnius, March 29-30, 2007.

Florita Montgomery West Virginia University Extension Allison Nichols West Virginia University Extension Teresa McCoy University of Maryland Extension.

New professional standards for social workers Effective from 1 st November 2015.

Horizon 2020 Secure Societies Disaster-Resilience Workshop 18 Mar /06/2016.

Lab case study summary: William Hill - accounting policies February 2015.

“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.

Nuts and Bolts: Functional Variations of Assessment and Evaluation Barbara Hornum, PhD Director, Drexel Center for Academic Excellence Associate Professor,

Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar

Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event

Aid Transparency Assessment

Accessing health information in the UK

Evidence Based Practice In the Community Sector

Auditing Sustainable Development Goals

A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation

Assessment for Learning (AfL)

Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar

Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the policy of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand the following presenter has indicated that they have.

Health Partnership Project

Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the policy of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand the following presenter has indicated that they have.

Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the policy of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand the following presenter has indicated that they have.

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the policy of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand the following presenter has indicated that they have.

The Initiative for Climate Action Transparency

Quality Framework Overview

Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the policy of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand the following presenter has indicated that they have.

Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the policy of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand the following presenter has indicated that they have.

Presentation transcript:

InfluenceMap.org Objective, neutral analysis of corporate influence on climate policy February 2015

What is InfluenceMap A Web-based mapping of relationships between companies, business associations and lobbying firms in the context of climate change policy. A knowledge base of the extent to which companies and business associations are influencing climate policy, based on sets of legitimate and transparent evidence sources. A scoring and comparison system for quantifying this issue.

What is InfluenceMap Internet based tool, graphical in nature that will allow users to gain an overview of climate policy influencing activity. Layers of hyperlinks to details of our data relating to business associations, companies, individuals and finally discrete examples of influencing activity. Our transparent scoring system will allow comparison between companies and business associations’ involvement in influencing climate policy, clearly showing the logic of each score.

Who is behind InfluenceMap Founded as a UK based non-profit by environmental and Internet entrepreneur Dylan Tanner (ERM, ekobai.com) and former CDP Lead Policy Analyst Thomas O'Neill.ERMekobai.comCDP Working in partnership with the Union of Concerned Scientists on methodology for assessment of corporate influence.Union of Concerned Scientists Funded by leading foundations interested in creating a neutral, objective knowledge base on this important topic.

How is InfluenceMap Unique A living, dynamic knowledge base, updated in real time. We do not issue 100 page reports. Or retain highly paid climate experts. We assess a range of evidence sources (GRI reports, CDP responses, disclosure web sites, consultation outcomes) and weigh them according to reliability and importance in our scoring. We are objective and neutral – its up to civil society to refer to our tool and decide to what extent corporation should be involved in the climate policy process.

InfluenceMap: Looking Ahead Working tool by summer 2015 – looking towards UNFCCC Paris Dec 2015 Want to partner with like minded people and organizations Following first iteration we will absorb user and community feedback Discussions with anchor donors ongoing. Contact:

Appendix How InfluenceMap Works Mapping Assessment Scoring and Updating

Mapping Assessment Scoring Updating How InfluenceMap Works

Mapping the Links Relation ships Companies Business Associations Key People Lobbyists Strands of Evidence We map relationships between companies, lobbyists, people etc. and also connect these to strands of evidence. The strength of each relationship is weighted.

Assessment We have worked out, along with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a set of indicators covering corporate influence on climate policy.Union of Concerned Scientists

Assessment Data sources are chosen carefully to ensure we have similar data for each company. Data sources are weighted by reliability.

Scoring and Updating We query each of our data sources against these indicators, using well defined questions and highly transparent and consistent instructions to our scoring team. Scores can be viewed for companies and business associations, by indicator and by data source with the full logic apparent. Aggregate scores can be used to compare business associations and companies across geographies or sectors. Scores change in real time as new data becomes apparent.