Jon Manning, CPPB Buyer II, County of Placer October 10, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Purchasing and Contracts Research Funded Procurement Outreach Training Level III Procurements $50,000 and Above.
Advertisements

MASBO February Information to purchase Services Information to purchase Construction.
The Office of State Procurement
APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA Cooperative Purchasing Programs APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA.
DME PANEL CONTRACTS John Fisher Program Manager – Procurement.
And some other tips. Society of Government Travel Professionals Educational Conference September 5, 2012 Washington DC Tim Hay State of Oregon.
IDOA Office Supply and Toner Products Pre-Proposal Conference May 10, 2013 Adam Thiemann IDOA Strategic Sourcing Analyst.
State of Nebraska Procurement Presented to: Veterans in Business Forum Lincoln, NE - June 7, 2013 Omaha, NE – June 13, 2013.
U.S. Pretrial Services and Probation Office Northern District of Ohio.
Procurement: What Everyone Needs to Know. What is Procurement? “The act of obtaining something”
Government Services How to Respond to a Request for Proposal (RFP) 2006.
Roadmap to Success How to become a business partner with MCPS!
PURCHASING 101 HOW TO BEGIN. Is the purchase available from the District Warehouse?  Online catalogs are/will be available on the district web page for.
Presented by Department of Finance Purchasing Division Cecelia H. Stowe, CPPO, C.P.M., Purchasing Director Eileen M. Falcone, Senior Buyer.
Cooperative Purchasing— An Effective Sourcing Strategy Gary D. Link, C.P.M. E&I Cooperative Purchasing Ralph Maier University of Pennsylvania.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT “How We Do Business”
Division of Purchase and Contract North Carolina Procurement Conference Raleigh – April 24-25, 2012 New Legislation of Interest Sam Byassee, State Purchasing.
Reverse Auctioning at the University of Pennsylvania SUNY Purchasing Association Fall Conference October 9, 2003.
For West Virginia Department of Education DISCLAIMER This PowerPoint presentation serves only as a snapshot of purchasing regulations. Please visit the.
1 Purchasing and Procurement Processes Module Four Revision Date: 2/06/2015.
THE NC CHILD NUTRITION PROCUREMENT ALLIANCE WHO WE ARE…
WELCOME TO THE PROCUREMENT SEMINAR Procurement and Contracts An Overview of Contract Administration.
How to Become a BuyBoard Vendor and What Are the Benefits.
School District Purchasing. Purchasing Authority Arizona Statutes Arizona Statutes Arizona Administrative Code Arizona Administrative Code  Primary source.
Cooperative Purchasing Who’s Looking Out for Your Interests? Tony Des Chenes, Director Commodities Division Purchasing Operations.
NATIONAL PURCHASING PARTNERS and LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES Emerald Piedad, Account Manager (800)
TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE COOPERATIVE PURCHASING NETWORK THE NETWORK PRESENTED BY: CHARLIE OBERRENDER, CPPB DIRECTOR OF COOPERATIVE PURCHASING.
Vendor 411 Are you doing business with Lancaster ISD ?
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (c) 2013 New Jersey Government Energy Aggregation P.L c. 24 “GEA Act” Gary E Finger Ombudsman New Jersey Board.
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT “How We Do Business”
12-1 Project Management from Simple to Complex This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.
The RFP: How to Manage the Process Bob Yecke Assistant Director, University Unions University of Michigan Ann Arbor.
1 Doing Business with the University of North Texas System September 2015.
Advanced Project Management Project Procurement/Contract Management Ghazala Amin.
1 Cooperative ___Agreements___ __or__ Leveraged Purchasing Agreements (LPA)
TEXAS ARKANSAS PURCHASING SYSTEM. TIPS/TAPS History  Original Name – Texas Interlocal Purchasing System  Hosted by Region 8 Education Service Center.
Alpha Contracting Sole Source Negotiations between Government and Industry (13 CFR (c)(2))
HOW THE STATE CAN LEVERAGES PURCHASING VOLUME AND RESOURCES Cooperative Purchasing.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
Small Purchase of Professional Service Providers Administrative Rule R
Strategic Cooperatives: How to select and make the most of Cooperative Purchasing Programs.
NASPO ValuePoint Aftermarket Automotive Parts Cynthia Okoroike State of California December 2015.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
PURCHASING 101 SECTION 1 - How to Begin. Is the purchase available from your agency or from other state agencies? ⋆ State Surplus Property ⋆ State Fleet.
1 Office of Procurement Presents Request for Proposal (RFP) Process.
Cooperative Procurement MD Association of Community Colleges Procurement Officers June 2015.
States Working Together WSCA-NASPO Contracting Processes 1.
Compliance with CCNA F.S..  Advertisement  Longlist  Shortlist  Request for Proposal  Scope of Services Meeting  Technical Proposal Review.
Contract Compliance Training
“How To Do Business” with Atlanta Public Schools
Purchasing Workshop for Vendors
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Processes and Procedures for Contracting at UO
BuyBoard Member Training Cesar Lopez & Angel Magallanes
Doing Business with Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
“How To Do Business” with Atlanta Public Schools
Supply Chain Management Principles
Texas Woman’s University
Contract Compliance Training
Department of Community Development
“How We Do Business”.
THE OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TRAINING MAY 2018
Presenter’s Contact Information Larry Klein Procurement Services Group Office of General Services (518) OGS Website.
Stockton University State Contract Training
PACE Purchasing Cooperative
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Texas Woman’s University
Together, We Care More Meet MMCAP Infuse.
Presentation transcript:

Jon Manning, CPPB Buyer II, County of Placer October 10, 2014

Please note that agencies should always check with their legal counsel first before using any of the cooperative contracts, other cooperative purchasing options, or any other information provided in this presentation.

 A cooperative agreement represents the mutual needs for the same goods or services of two or more organizations/agencies.

TRUE COOPERATIVES  Two or more agencies that combine their requirements for similar goods or services into one competitive solicitation (RFP, IFB, etc.) to obtain volume pricing.  Requires collaborative effort to develop specifications, terms, and conditions for bid document.  Typically a “lead agency” will conduct the competitive process. THIRD-PARTY AGGREGATORS  Independent agency/organization whose primary purpose is to award contracts representing the common requirements of two or more agencies.  Most third-party aggregators require agencies to become members of their cooperative before using their contracts.  Contracts are managed by the independent agency/organization.

COOPERATIVE CONTRACTS  Multiple agencies that purchase goods or services off a single contract that was awarded by another organization/agency.  Also known as “piggyback”, “rider”, or “bridge” contracts.  Typically cooperative contracts specifically state within the competitive solicitation that other agencies may use the resulting agreement.

 Saves time/effort  Cost savings  Higher quality of products/services  Program rebates (if applicable)  Solid enforceable contract  Convenience  Efficient delivery  Allows your agency to focus on other tasks/projects  Expanded pricing tiers (if applicable)

 Pricing is not always guaranteed to be lowest or best value  Operational/logistical problems  Not enough contract choices/options  Lack of service/not responsive to customer service related issues  Lack of transparency (contract docs)  Scope of work/specifications may not fully meet your agency’s needs  Typically does not include/consider local vendors

 Office Supplies  Audio/Visual Equipment  IT Hardware  Vehicles  Heavy Equipment  Furniture  Food  Janitorial Supplies  Drugs/Pharmaceuticals  Scientific/Lab Equipment & Supplies  Classroom Supplies  Fuel  Mowers/Grounds Maintenance Equipment  Building/Construction Supplies and Hardware  Logistics Services  Mailing Equipment  Footwear and Uniforms  Auto Parts  Exercise Equipment  Document Shredding Services  Office Machines (copiers)  Electronic/Offender Monitoring Services  Cloud Hosting Services

 WSCA-NASPO Cooperative Purchasing Organization -  National IPA -  National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) -  State of California Department of General Services  US Communities -  The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN)  National Cooperative Purchasing Alliance (NCPA) –  ProcureSource (Cooperative Contract Directory) -

 CalACT/MBTA Purchasing Cooperative (Transit Vehicles)  CalSAVE (School equipment and supplies, IT solutions)  FireRescue Group Purchasing Organization (FRGPO) - gpo.comhttp:// gpo.com  National Purchasing Partners (NPP) -  HGACBuy -  PEPPM Technology Bidding and Purchasing Program -  Keystone Purchasing Network (KPN) –  NIGP Cooperative Purchasing Programs Directory -

 Does the lead agency require membership prior to using the cooperative agreement?  Was the contract awarded by a public agency?  Does the agreement comply with your codes/regulations?  Was the cooperative agreement competitively bid or negotiated?  Is the contract current and in effect for all proposed purchases?  Are there any fees associated with using the agreement?  Is this cooperative agreement the most advantageous solution?  What was the award amount of the original solicitation?

 LEGAL - Verify that your code/laws/policy allows your agency to use the cooperative agreement.  MEMBERSHIP – Review membership terms and conditions and related paperwork.  DO YOUR HOMEWORK – Research the cooperative organization to determine what type of organization the cooperative is.  COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT – Review the following documents: Original solicitation (including specifications/scope) Evaluation and award summary Copy of the successful bid or proposal Complete final contract (signed) Any other documents required by the contract

 CONTRACT AWARD – Is the award sound and justifiable?  TERMS AND CONDITIONS – Review for potential conflicts.  RESEARCH OTHER COOPERATIVES – Look for other cooperative agreements that might offer the same goods/services.

 Identify potential commodity to bid out  Identify potential partner agencies  Determine lead agency (volunteer)  Gather information from partner agencies regarding: Definite quantity and delivery; or Indefinite quantity and delivery Product description Requirements Specifications Delivery locations Historical spend data

 Develop rough draft of solicitation document, specifications, scope of work/service, delivery, terms, conditions, and sample contract.  Send the rough draft to all participating agencies for review and comments.  ADMINISTRATIVE FEES:  Offsets the costs of staff time and other resources for the lead agency.  Must be stated up front in the solicitation document with the calculating formula and provisions clearly defined.  Understand that the higher the administrative fees are the less advantageous the pricing will be (negates the benefit of the cooperative).

 Use vendor lists from participating agencies to send notices to.  Advertise the solicitation in accordance with prevailing laws.  Post the solicitation on the lead agency’s website.  Designate one point-of-contact for inquiries/questions.  Notify the participating agencies that the solicitation has been released and provide them with copies of the final documents.  Lead agency shall be responsible for all addendums, pre-proposal conferences, etc.

 Lead agency shall receive, open, and tabulate the responses to the solicitation.  The lead agency shall evaluate the solicitation in accordance with the prescribed evaluation methodology.  The lead agency shall negotiate terms and conditions and any other elements as- needed.  The lead agency will make a recommendation for award to their governing board (if applicable).  Once the solicitation has been awarded the lead agency will distribute copies of the solicitation documents to the participating agencies.

 Lead agency shall administer its own contract award.  Participating agencies are responsible for obtaining approval from their individual governing bodies to execute a contract with the awarded vendor(s).  Lead agency provides assistance in resolving problems relating to the contract/solicitation; participating agencies can resolve problems relating to their executed contract.  Lead agency should develop and distribute a contractor/vendor performance reporting form for participating agencies to use.  Lead agency should obtain regularly scheduled contract sales reports.  Lead agency should schedule meetings with the contract vendor(s) to review performance reports and discuss any other related issues.

 Solid Solicitation Document and Process  Include Technical Specialists/Experts  Clear, Concise Award Documents  Transparency/Accessible Information  Effective Communication  Effective Leadership

 Cooperative agreements are a great tool to agencies  Exercise caution and due diligence – cooperatives should not be used as a “catch-all”  Don’t be afraid to collaborate with other agencies when a common need is identified – potential for cost savings.