Evaluation and Revalidation 2014/15 Catherine Avery ACADEMIC OFFICE BRIEFING SEMINAR 1 OCTOBER 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Involvement Madrid October 2006 Norman Sharp, Director, QAA Scotland Duncan Cockburn, Senior Development Officer, sparqs.
Advertisements

Directorate of Human Resources Embedding graduate attributes within the curriculum Rhona Sharpe, OCSLD Liz Turner, APQO.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision The Basics Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision
Development of HEAR at Ulster Background to HEAR Content of HEAR Challenges in development Academic performance (4.3) Additional information (6.1) Roll.
View of an Internal Panel Member Evaluation and Re-Validation Panel Member Carol Reid Ulster Business School Wednesday 2 October 2013.
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
Developing Successful Articulation Programmes Neil Slater International Office Northumbria University.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
What’s driving the need for flexible curricula? How are our learners changing and what are their needs/expectations for flexible curricula? QAA Enhancement.
What (if anything) happened next? by Andrew Reeve.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Practical Placements & the QAA and ASET Guidelines By Ian Sunley & Lorna Uden Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Staffordshire University,
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Validation, Annual Review and Periodic Subject Review at the University of Northampton Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25 April.
Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Confirmation of Candidature Progress Reports
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Ulster.ac.uk A Revalidation Unit Co-ordinator’s Perspective Dr V. Naughton School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Life & Health Sciences (October 2015)
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
Ulster.ac.uk Evaluation and Revalidation 2015/16 Briefing Seminar Catherine Avery Academic Office 7 October 2015.
Taking Learning Development outside of the university Catherine McConnell, University of Brighton.
Monday, March 07, 20161Chairing PARM Events Programme Approval, Review and Modification: The roles and responsibilities of the PARM Chair Peggy Cooke Head.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY CONTINUOUS AUDIT BRIEFING 2015/16 ACTIVITIES Quality Assurance Services.
GCE English Literature Tuesday 13 November - Everglades Hotel, Derry Wednesday 14 November - Tullylagan Hotel, Cookstown Thursday 15 November - Stormont.
Tips for Academic Quality Assurance Hugh Starkey Tempus DO IT 2 nd Consortium Meeting Landau 13 March 2013.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Academic excellence for business and the professions CASE The accreditation event: roles and expectations Gill Harrison 1st September 2014.
Evaluation and Revalidation 2016/17 Briefing Seminar
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
‘Preparing for Periodic Review’
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
‘Preparing for Periodic Review’
The University of the Future: Preparing for Curriculum Refresh
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Periodic Developmental Reviews (PDR)
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
External Examiner Briefing: Report Writing 22 January
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UWE Bristol External Examiners day 27th January 2016
Validation and Periodic Programme Review Chairs and Panel Members
Validation Programme Developers
University Framework for Quality and Standards Academic Registry
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation and Revalidation 2014/15 Catherine Avery ACADEMIC OFFICE BRIEFING SEMINAR 1 OCTOBER 2014

Programme Approval/Re-approval  Purpose  Revalidation Units and Cycle  Evaluation/Revalidation process  Curriculum Management System (CMS)  Panel composition  Panel Papers  Validation Meeting  Documentation  Issues raised by Panels (2013/14)  Issues raised by students (2013/14)  Key issues for consideration

Purpose EVALUATION :  accords with the University’s purpose and core strategic aims;  academic structure and content appropriate;  accords with the University’s scheme of qualifications; modular structure; credit framework and general regulations for the award;  standard and student workload comparable to those of other programmes nationally;  resources sufficient to meet aims and objectives;  evidence of reasonable employment and progression opportunities. REVALIDATION: re-affirmation of standards currency of curriculum continuing relevance to University’s Strategic Aims

Revalidation Units and Cycle Subject units  Groupings of cognate programmes  Reflect discipline and/or campus, level (UG/PG)  Revalidation course listing Cycle  Five year cycle  Monthly schedule of revalidation events

Revalidation Process CA6 Faculty Revalidation Unit Coordinator Document prepared Revalidation CASC LTC meeting Faculty response

Curriculum Management System (CMS) New system to support production and approval of curriculum documentation for internal University courses (Phase 1) Resource for:  Modules – creation and revision  Programme Specification  Courses/Subjects – preparation of validation documentation  Approval processes – course revisions, course withdrawals, validation documents, credit-bearing short course modules

Key Benefits  Online documentation and approval process  Automatic creation of PDFs of programme specifications and module descriptions  Facility to obtain feedback from colleagues on draft versions  Facility to update reading lists and teaching teams  Online accessible, single repository of full module and course information  Information can be used for other curriculum-related documents  HEAR - programme-level learning outcomes  KIS – teaching, learning and assessment methods

Panel Composition  Chair  Dean (or nominee) (collaborative provision only)  One internal member  One student representative (revalidation only)  Two external members (subject experts)  Industry/employer representative  PSRB representatives (joint events only) In Attendance: Secretary (Academic Office) Subject Partnership Manager (collaborative provision)

Papers for the Meeting  Guidelines for panels  Agenda and programme  Subject benchmark and PSRB standards  External examiner reports (revalidation only)  Course/subject document  Preliminary comments - CA7 (panel members)  CA4 form (completed by Subject Partnership Manager)  Central Department Reports: Library, IT, ADDL

Validation Meeting  Introductions and tour of facilities specialist teaching facilities  Private Panel Meeting to plan the conduct of the meeting to exchange views on the provision  Meeting with Senior Management Team to discuss higher level strategic issues

Meeting contd.  Meeting with Students to explore students’ views (revalidation only)  Meeting with Course Team to discuss the provision in detail  Private Panel session to reach a decision on approval  Meeting with Senior Management Team to feedback conclusions and recommendations

Document Section A: Introduction  Brief summary of rationale, origins, demand, relationship other courses in School/Faculty/subject  Projected intakes for next 5 years Section B: Course/Subject Provision  B1 Programme Specification(s) (template available)

B2 Commentaries: Recent and proposed changes Academic progression, internal coherence, choice Structure diagram Transfer to and from course, progression Work-based learning/placement/study abroad Learning, teaching and assessment docx Research/scholarship-informed curriculum and teaching Creativity, innovation and good practice Standards Relations with PSRBs Employability

 B3 – Regulations (Award templates on AO website)  B4 - Module Descriptions (template) TEMPLATE.DOC Section C: Resources  C1 - Physical resources  C2 - Staff resources

Examples of Issues Raised by Panels in 2013/14  Recruitment and Admission: projected enrolments, modes, entry requirements, application of APEL policy  Content and Standards: title of programme/modules, course structure, full-time/part-time, exit awards; graduate qualities; regulations; learning outcomes; research methods; study skills, work-based learning, articulation arrangements  Learning and Teaching: fully online, contact hours, engagement with ADDL, BBL, new technologies, research/scholarship-informed teaching, placement  Assessment and Feedback: Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning, assessment strategy, schedule, group work/individual marks, assessment criteria, formative/summative feedback

Cont.  Support for Students: induction, international students, cohort identity, employment opportunities guidance  Resources and Staff Development: library resources, IT software, outcentres, cohort size by site (partner institutions), links with employers and subject ‘peers’, recognised teachers, identification of staff development needs

Examples of Issues Raised by Students in 2013/14  Content: work experience, options, ‘challenge’ at PG level  Organisation and Delivery: supervisors, time-tabling, cohort identity, BBL, fully online delivery, access to support  Assessment and Feedback: ‘bunching’ of assignments, group work (too much, composition of groups, practical difficulties, assessment criteria, group and individual marks), nature, timing and quality of feedback, use of Pass/Fail grading  Resources: studio space, refreshment facilities and communal area, printing, short-term loan materials

KEY ISSUES  Changes to new proposals from that approved by APSC e.g. title, duration, mode, location  Exit awards  Graduate Qualities  Internationalisation of the curriculum  Study Skills  Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning  Group work policy  Course exemplar assessment schedule  Employability  Research and/or scholarship-informed teaching

PLACEMENT - DPP/DPP(I)  Customised learning outcomes  Placement  Assessment of Placement (two models)  Award grading RESEARCH PROJECT  All undergraduate and integrated Master’s degrees

Academic Office Website: -Assessment Handbook -Committees -Course and Subject Management -Curriculum Management System -Documents and forms -External Examiners -Learning and Teaching Strategy -Partner Institutions -Policies (A-Z) -Programme Approval & Revision -Regulations templates -Regulatory Framework -Staff -Standards

ACADEMIC OFFICE CONTACTS Alan Faulkner ext Catherine Avery ext 24294