Proposed Amendments to TEACHNJ Educator Evaluation Regulations August 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Advertisements

TEACHNJ Regulation Proposals: Building an Effective Evaluation System for Teachers and Principals March 6, 2013.
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Amendments to TEACHNJ Educator Evaluation Regulations April 2014.
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Student Growth Objective (SGO) Evaluating SGO Quality
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
TEM, LEM and Merit Pay Understanding the Components of the Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Measures and their use in the BCSD Merit Pay plan for
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Overview of Student Growth Percentiles for New Jersey Students and Educators March 4, 2015 Bari Anhalt Erlichson, Ph.D.,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
1 ScIP Workshop Data Resource *All data in this workshop is fictitious. It was created solely for this activity and is not copied from or based on any.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda February 6, 2014  AchieveNJ  Official Waiver Process…  Assessing and Adjusting SGOs (see attachment)  Marzano.
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION AND PUBLIC APRIL 15, 2013 New Jersey Department of Education School Performance Reports.
SGOs for Educators Providing Educational Services March 12, 2014 AchieveNJ Website Wireless connection at DOE Guest – doeit/wireless.
Today’s website:
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Developing Administrative Goals or….the last thing on your To Do list!
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
AchieveNJ: Increasing Student Achievement through Educator Effectiveness August 2014.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Student Growth Objectives Unifying Standards, Instruction, and Assessment to Improve Student Learning June
Rhode Island Model Teacher Evaluation & Support System Preparing for your End-of-Year Conference.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: AchieveNJ Update ScIP Update 8.14 (+ Sharing with DEAC next meeting) Resources: Teacher Evaluation.
Teacher Evaluation in BTSD (AchieveNJ) K-5 Meeting May 22 nd
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Community School Sponsor Evaluation Advisory Panel Final Recommendations.
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
+ Teacher Evaluations and Tenure Law J. Vysotsky.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
Achievenj in 2016 and beyond
APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.
NEPF Evaluation Scoring Guide: TLC Recommendations Nevada State Board of Education Meeting September 3, 2015.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
Measuring Principals’ Effectiveness:
Teacher Evaluation Process
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Evaluation weights for
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
TeachNJ By Heather Perruso.
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Valley Central School District
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
TEACHNJ Act Tenure Law & Value Added Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation in BTSD (AchieveNJ)
Evaluation by the Numbers
Value-added Teacher Evaluation
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Evaluation Training September 4, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Proposed Amendments to TEACHNJ Educator Evaluation Regulations August 2014

2 Summary As the result of conversations with teachers, administrators, and other education stakeholders, the Department is proposing targeted changes to the way that student achievement measures are factored into educator evaluation over the next school year. These proposed amendments primarily address: – Component weights of teacher and administrator evaluation – A Student Growth Objective (SGO) and Administrator Goal review process for the evaluation cycle

3 Agenda Proposed Changes Proposed Regulations for

4 Student Growth Objective and Administrator Goal Score Review : Student Growth Objective (SGO) and Administrator Goal Score Review Process SGO Review: If a teacher’s SGO score is the sole reason that his or her summative rating dropped from Effective to Partially Effective or from Partially Effective to Ineffective, the educator will be eligible to ask for an expedited review of the rating. Administrator Goal Review: If a principal’s Administrator Goal score is the sole reason that his or her summative rating dropped from Effective to Partially Effective or from Partially Effective to Ineffective, the educator will be eligible to ask for an expedited review of the rating.

5 Teacher Evaluation Weight Changes SY Proposed SY SGP teachers Non-SGP teachers SGP teachers Non-SGP teachers Student Achievement SGP30%0%10%0 SGO15% 20% PracticePractice Instrument 55%85%70%80%

6 Principal Evaluation Weight Changes SY Proposed SY Multi- grade SGP principals Single- grade SGP principals Non-SGP principals SGP principals Non-SGP principals Student Achievement SGP30%20%0%10%0% Administrator Goals 10%20%40%30%40% SGO Average10% PracticeEvaluation Leadership Rubric 20% Practice Instrument 30%

7 Agenda Proposed Changes Proposed Regulations for

8 Notable Requirement Changes TopicN.J.A.C. Originally Proposed Change ProposedRationale Appealing summative rating score due to SGO/Admin. Goal Score 6A: (f) 6A: (f) N/AWeight shall be adjusted by a chief school administrator or the Commissioner, as applicable To allow for SGO appeals process in limited circumstances Changing weight ranges for teachers 6A: (c)140-50%30-50%To allow for change in SGP and SGO weights for Changing weight ranges for administrators 6A: (c)120%-40%10-40%To allow for change in School-wide SGP weights for Changing date for setting of weights 6A:10-4.1(c)April 15August 31To allow for more time to determine proper weights on a yearly basis