District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar Objectives: – Identify common areas that teacher and principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision and the elements that are required. – Review principal and teacher evaluation plan templates. – Answer questions.

Evaluation Plan Sections Teacher Evaluation Plan IDAPA Standards Professional Practice Student Achievement Participants Evaluation Policy – Content Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records Evaluation System Approval Principal Evaluation Plan IDAPA Standards Professional Practice Student Achievement Evaluation Policy –Content Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records Evaluation System Approval

Needs Revision Common Areas Professional Practice Student Achievement Evaluation Policy

Needs Revision – Professional Practice Teacher Evaluation Plan IDAPA & % based on multiple measures of professional practice – Aligned to Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Second Edition (4 domains – 22 components) – Two (2) documented observations with one completed by January 1 st. – Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following: Parent/Guardian Input Student Input Portfolio Principal Evaluation IDAPA & % based on multiple measures of professional practice – Aligned to Idaho Standards for Effective Principals (3 domains – 14 components) – Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following: Parent/Guardian Input Teacher Input Student Input Portfolio

Needs Revision – Student Achievement Teacher Evaluation Plan IDAPA % based on multiple measures of student achievement – Based on growth in student achievement. – Include at least two measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced. – Identifies the other district determined measure. Principal Evaluation IDAPA % based on multiple measures of student achievement – Based on growth in student achievement. – Include at least two measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced. – Identifies the other district determined measure.

Other District Determined Student Achievement Measure Examples Student Learning Objectives (SLO’s) Pre and Post Assessments End of Course Assessments District-adopted vendor assessments

Questions? Any questions regarding: – 67% Professional Practice – 33% Student Achievement Next part of the webinar will cover evaluation policy and the evaluation plan-policy templates.

Needs Revision – Evaluation Policy Teacher Evaluation Plan IDAPA Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas) IDAPA Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation IDAPA Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records Principal Evaluation IDAPA Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas) IDAPA Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation IDAPA Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records

Evaluation Plan – Policy Templates Resource for districts – not a required format/form. Includes all areas as required by IDAPA Rule. Cannot be submitted as written: – Districts need to define the areas that are to be planed or determined by the district.

Individualizing Evaluation Rating System Shall be based on 67% Professional Practice and 33% Student Achievement – Numerical Summative Rating – Matrix Summative Rating Professional Practice (67%) Professional Practice (67%) Student Achievement (33%) Student Achievement (33%) Summative Evaluation Rating

Overall Summative Rating Matrix Example Professional Practice - 67% Unsatisfactory = 1Basic = 2Proficient = 3Distinguished = 4 Student Achievement - 33% Unsatisfactory = 1 Unsatisfactory = 1.00 Unsatisfactory = 1.67 Basic = 2.34 Proficient = 3.01 Basic = 2 Unsatisfactory = 1.33 Basic = 2.00 Proficient = 2.67 Proficient = 3.34 Proficient = 3 Unsatisfactory = 1.66 Basic = 2.33 Proficient = 3.00 Distinguished = 3.67 Distinguised = 4 Unsatisfactory = 1.99 Proficient = 2.66 Proficient = 3.33 Distinguished = 4.00 Overall Summative Rating Scale = Distinguished = Proficient = Basic = Unsatisfactory

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar Common areas that teacher and principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision: – Professional Practice – Student Achievement – Evaluation Policy Evaluation plan templates as resource for districts.

Questions? Any questions regarding: – 67% Professional Practice – 33% Student Achievement – Evaluation Policy – Evaluation Plan-Policy Templates

Thank You! Lisa Colón Educator Effectiveness Coordinator (208)