HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1277r0 Submission MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices Date: Authors: Nov 2010 Slide 1Byeongwoo Kang, LG Electronics.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Preamble Structure in ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0716r6 Submission PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter: Shiwen HE May 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /1211r0 Submission September 2014 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Ack Procedure for OFDMA Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Protocol and signaling framework for OFDMA
Submission doc.: IEEE /1397r0 Month Year Myeong-Jin Kim, Korea UniversitySlide 1 Discussion on Frame Structure for Future WLAN Systems with OFDMA.
Doc.: IEEE /1228r0 Submission September 2014 xxx, NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0824r0 July 2015 Slide 1 Pilot Design for 11ax Downlink Transmissions Date: Authors: Yujin Noh, Newracom.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1088r0 September 2015 Daewon Lee, NewracomSlide 1 LTF Design for Uplink MU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1305 Submission STBC and Padding Discussions Nov, 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, et. al.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0112r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. January 2013 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for the Next Generation WLAN Date:
Doc.: IEEE /536r0 Submission September 2001 A. Soomro and S. Choi, Philips Research, USASlide 1 Proposal to Add Link Margin Field in IEEE h.
Doc.: IEEE /86r0 Submission January 2015 Uplink MU Transmission and Legacy Coexistence Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1122r0 Submission Identifiers in HE PPDUs for power saving Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September.
Submission Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0584r1May 2015 Considerations on LTF Sequence Design Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0883r0 Submission PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: February 5, 2016 Presenter: Haiming.
Doc.: IEEE aj Submission PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter: Shiwen.
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r0 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0819r1 Submission July 2010 Ravi Mahadevappa, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions Date:
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/0660r0 Submission May 2014 Minho Cheong, NEWRACOMSlide ax Timeline Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0883r2 Submission September 2014 PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter:
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0079r2 January 2016 Kentaro Taniguchi, ToshibaSlide 1 Allocation sizes for BCC in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Doc.: IEEE /0617r0 Submission NDP sounding May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r2 Submission Pilot Value Definitions May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE aj Submission PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter: Haiming.
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1060r0 September 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Receive Operating Mode Indication for Power Save Date: Authors:
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Inefficiency of 256-FFT per 20MHz
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
PHY SIG Frame Structure for IEEE aj (45GHz)
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Packet Design for Wake-up Receiver (WUR)
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Physical Layer Encoding for Interoperable NGV New Modulations
Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Presentation transcript:

HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2014 HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA Date: 2014-09-14 Authors: Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM John Doe, Some Company

MIMO-OFDMA in High Efficiency WLAN September 2014 MIMO-OFDMA in High Efficiency WLAN Current release of Wi-Fi devices is supporting 20/40/80 MHz channel bandwidth Up to 4 space time streams for SU-MIMO Next release of Wi-Fi devices is upcoming with following additional features 160 MHz channel bandwidth, Downlink MU-MIMO Candidate technologies (such OFDMA) of IEEE 802.11ax should be based on IEEE 802.11n/ac advanced MIMO technology (MU-MIMO, STBC) Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

MIMO-OFDMA in High Efficiency WLAN September 2014 MIMO-OFDMA in High Efficiency WLAN OFDMA is a promising technology for enhancing the user experience by serving the heterogeneous users simultaneously In order to serve heterogeneous users (having different link quality), the following TXVECTOR parameters should be considered as user-specific values MCS: indicates the modulation and coding scheme NUM_STS: indicates the number of space-time streams STBC: indicates whether STBC is used FEC_CODING: indicates which FEC encoding is used Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA September 2014 HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA Proposed HEW PPDU format FFT size is increased N times to efficiently support MIMO-OFDMA For example, when N is 4, the following FFT size may be used for each channel bandwidth 256 FFT on 20 MHz channel, 512 FFT on 40 MHz channel, 1024 FFT on 80 MHz channel, 2048 FFT on 160 MHz channel Also, single 20 MHz channel (256 FFT) can be composed of several sub-channels (e.g., 4 sub-channels in the below figure) Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA September 2014 HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA Proposed HEW SIG field design TXVECTOR parameter MCS on each sub-channels can be different TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS on each sub-channels can be different The SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO can be applied to each sub-channels differently TXVECTOR parameter STBC on each sub-channels should be allowed IEEE 802.11ac does not allow STBC for MU-MIMO PPDU transmission TXVECTOR parameter FEC_CODING on each sub-channels can be different TXVECTOR parameter GI_TYPE on each sub-channels should be common Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA September 2014 HEW PPDU Format for Supporting MIMO-OFDMA Proposed HEW SIG field design 802.11ac MU-MIMO 802.11ax MIMO-OFDMA TXVECTOR parameter MCS User-specific value TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS TXVECTOR parameter STBC Not Allowed Allowed to either user-specific or common value TXVECTOR parameter FEC_CODING TXVECTOR parameter GI_TYPE Common value Discuss the more details in the next slides Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format When MIMO-OFDMA supports a user-specific TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS, OFDM symbols alignment issue on HEW PSDUs is occurred OFDM symbols on HEW PSDUs should be aligned on each sub-channels Otherwise, each sub-channel needs a separate transmitter/receiver processing chains Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format OFDM symbols alignment issue on HEW PSDUs Misalignment on the HEW PSDU transmission start time Because the number of the space time streams of the HEW PSDU transmitted on each sub-channels can be different, the number of HEW-LTFs transmitted on each sub-channels can be different When the OFDM symbol durations of HEW-LTF and HEW PSDU is different (such as Short GI), the OFDM symbols of HEW PSDUs are not aligned each other Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format Proposed Solutions for OFDM symbols alignment First option is to make the OFDM symbol duration of HEW-LTF and the HEW PSDU as the same Second option is to make the number of HEW-LTFs transmitted on each sub-channels as the same Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format First option for OFDM symbols alignment For example, AP transmits 2 space time streams to each STA1 and STA2 on sub-channel 1 1 space time stream to each STA3 and STA4 on sub-channel 2 1 space time stream to STA5 on sub-channel 3 1 space time stream to STA6 on sub-channel 4 PSDU and HEW-LTF (HEW SIG-B also) are transmitted with same GI (G3 in Fig), except for the common HEW preamble field Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format Second option for OFDM symbols alignment For example, AP transmits 2 space time streams to each STA1 and STA2 on sub-channel 1 1 space time stream to each STA3 and STA4 on sub-channel 2 1 space time stream to STA5 on sub-channel 3 1 space time stream to STA6 on sub-channel 4 But, AP is equally transmitting 4 LTFs on all sub-channels Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 1) TXVECTOR parameter NUM_STS Discussion on HEW PPDU Format Second option for OFDM symbols alignment AP is transmitting extra LTFs on a sub-channel if the required LTFs on the sub-channel is less than the largest one The total required LTFs on sub-channel 1 are 4 (i.e., no extra LTF) The total required LTFs on sub-channel 2 are 2 (i.e., 2 extra LTFs) The total required LTFs on sub-channel 3 is 1 (i.e., 3 extra LTFs) The total required LTFs on sub-channel 4 is 1 (i.e., 3 extra LTFs) Extra LTFs Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 2) TXVECTOR parameter STBC Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 2) TXVECTOR parameter STBC Discussion on HEW PPDU Format In 802.11ac Downlink MU-MIMO, STBC was not allowed. In 802.11ax MIMO-OFDMA, STBC should be allowed. But, we needs to discuss whether TXVECTOR parameter STBC is set to either a user-specific value or a common value. Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 2) TXVECTOR parameter STBC Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 2) TXVECTOR parameter STBC Discussion on HEW PPDU Format First option for STBC: TXVECTOR parameter STBC on each sub-channels is common No STBC Transmission STBC Transmission TXTIME of HEW PSDUs are adjusted to have the same OFDM symbols Note) Figures in this slide assumes the second option for OFDM symbols alignment as one of example. We are not biased to any specific option. Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

Part 2) TXVECTOR parameter STBC Discussion on HEW PPDU Format September 2014 Part 2) TXVECTOR parameter STBC Discussion on HEW PPDU Format Second option for STBC: TXVECTOR parameter STBC on each sub-channels can be different For example, AP transmits 4 space time stream with STBC on sub-channel 1 and 2 1 space time stream without STBC on sub-channel 3 and 4 TXTIME of HEW PSDUs are adjusted to have the same OFDM symbols Note) Figures in this slide assumes the second option for OFDM symbols alignment as one of example. We are not biased to any specific option. Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM

September 2014 Conclusion Advanced MIMO technology of IEEE 802.11n/ac should be a base of IEEE 802.11ax new technology Such new technologies should enhance the user experience by serving the heterogeneous users simultaneously Also, to efficiently support heterogeneous users (having different link quality and different device capability), at least the following TXVECTOR parameters should be considered as user-specific values MCS, NUM_STS, FEC_CODING And, STBC should be allowed as user-specific value or a common value Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM