New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
Advertisements

METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
A Comprehensive Provincial Air Emissions Inventory to Support AEMERA, ESRD and the AER Richard Melick Emissions Inventory Scientist Air Policy.
BCC PUBLIC HEARING Concrete & Asphalt Plants Ordinance Adoption Hearing ZONING DIVISION January 27, 2015.
Breach of a Requirement of the Code Marisa Orbea New York 19 June 2012.
Windsor Solutions, Inc. State and Local Emissions Inventory System (SLEIS) WV DEP Regulated Community Training Tuesday, December 4 th 2012.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
Modernization of Approvals Presentation to Air Practitioners
INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT. Why is preliminary assessment required ? To understand the current indoor air quality problems To develop a database on.
World Health Organization
Determination of System Equivalency – Starting note for WLTP IWG Meeting #8 in Pune, India Audi, EA-52, V2.0 WLTP-08-09e.
IN FOCUS LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS RECYCLER QUALIFICATION OFFICE MARCH 2014.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Good Manufacturing Practice. Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations Establishes minimum GMP for methods to be used, and the facilities or controls to.
Overview of Land Use Compatibility between Sensitive Land Uses and Nuisance Sources Peter Piersol A&WMA/OPPI Land Use Compatibility.
Division Of State Funding Charter Schools For School Year Nora T. Rainey, Program Specialist Phone Number (512) Fax Number (512)
Principal’s Per Session Application Screen Shots
HD 2007 Rule Diesel Fuel Sulfur Testing and Sampling Methods and Requirements US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality November 20, 2002.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Kathy Alexander, Ph.D. Technical Specialist Water Availability Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
This PowerPoint has been produced for the public and is made available for non-commercial use (e.g. toolbox meetings,
Welcome Revisions of Chapter WAC Sections -035 and -036 Rule advisory committee workshop #5 Lacey, WA October 28, 2009.
Case study: SEA for land-use plan amendments of Krasna Hora municipality.
EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING EXPEDITED PERMIT PILOT PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER MEETING Wednesday, September 13, 2006.
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Inspection Directions: An EMS Approach to Inspecting for Section 608 and 609 Compliance.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
MDS 3.0 and RUG-IV FY 2012 Updates and Clarifications March RAI and MDS Conference.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Regulation 13 Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with GRRF which has been updated to ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/7 Prepared by the.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Title V, Preliminary Completeness Review. What do I need to do?  I need to find out if the application contains the required information.  Initial Title.
Solid Waste Management Plans Update Webinar Training March 5, 2014.
REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA Part 8 of the Waste Act Ms Mishelle Govender Chemicals and Waste Management.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Hydro One Community Liaison Committee Minister’s Conditions Meeting #2 August 19, 2014 Solina Hall.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Regulation 13-H Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/16 Prepared by the ad hoc group on Transitional Provisions.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
INDIAN TAKEOVERS Meaning Of Acqusition: When an “acquirer” takes over the control of the “target company”, it is termed as takeover. When an acquirer.
Balancing the Three R’s: Regulations, Records, and Reports Dallas, TX ♦ May 18, 2016 Arron Heinerikson.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Final Rule on OTI Licenses - Docket NCBFAA Conference, Tucson AZ – April 19, 2016.
New Reporting Annual ETC Reporting One-time items
Department of Environmental Quality
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Transmitted by the expert
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
TRTR Briefing September 2013
TGT Telecon Slides, February 9th
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
SA – 700 (Revised) Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements SA-701 Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
and Forecasting Resources
Presentation transcript:

New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group February 11, 2015

Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Basic Comprehensive User Guide (March 2011): A single Environmental Compliance Approval (Air) that replaces existing Environmental Compliance Approval(s) (Air) and includes new or historically unapproved sources of all emissions from the facility. The Approval requires that the ECA with LOF holder be accountable to demonstrate ongoing compliance with Regulation 419/05 - Air Pollution – Local Air Quality and other performance requirements in accordance with the conditions in the Approval. Further, the Approval permits modifications such as process changes, de-bottlenecking or the addition of new equipment subject to the Limited Operational Flexibility conditions specified on the ECA with LOF. 2

Major changes to the current template Merged the current 2 definitions: 1."Acceptable Maximum Ground Level Concentration" means a concentration accepted by the Ministry, as described in the Guide to Applying for Approval (Air & Noise), for a Compound of Concern listed in the Original ESDM Report that: (a)has no Ministry Point of Impingement Limit and no Jurisdictional Screening Level, or (b)has a concentration at a Point of Impingement that exceeds the Jurisdictional Screening Level. 22. "Maximum Concentration Level Assessment" means the Maximum Concentration Level Assessment for the purposes of an Approval, described in the Basic Comprehensive User Guide, prepared by a Toxicologist using currently available toxicological information, that demonstrates that the concentration at any Point of Impingement for a Compound of Concern that does not have a Ministry Point of Impingement Limit is not likely to cause an adverse effect as defined by the EPA. 3

Major changes to the current template into 1 definition: 1. “Acceptable Point of Impingement Concentration” means a concentration accepted by the Ministry as not likely to cause an adverse effect for a Compound of Concern that, (a) does not have a Ministry Point of Impingement Limit or a Jurisdictional Screening Level; or (b) has a concentration at a Point of Impingement that exceeds the Jurisdictional Screening Level. With respect to the Original ESDM Report the Acceptable Point of Impingement Concentration for a Compound of Concern mentioned above is the concentration set out in the Original ESDM Report. 4

Major changes to the current template Changed definition of “Compound of Concern”: 8."Compound of Concern" means a contaminant that, based on generally available information, may be discharged to the air in a quantity from the Facility that: (a)is non-negligible in accordance with section 26(1)4 of O. Reg. 419/05 in comparison to the relevant Ministry Point of Impingement Limit; or (b)if a Ministry Point of Impingement Limit is not available for the compound, may cause an adverse effect at a Point of Impingement based on generally available toxicological information. Replaced by: 8."Compound of Concern" means a contaminant described in paragraph 4 subsection 26 (1) of O. Reg. 419/05; namely, a contaminant that is discharged from the Facility in an amount that is not negligible. 5

Major changes to the current template Changed definition of “Log” : 21."Log" means the up-to-date log that is used to track all Modifications to the Facility since the date of this Approval as required by the Documentation Requirements conditions of this Approval. Replaced by: 21."Log" means a document that contains a record of each change that is required to be made to the ESDM Report and Acoustic Assessment Report, including the date on which the change occurred. For example, a record would have to be made of a more accurate emission rate for a source of contaminant, more accurate meteorological data, a more accurate value of a parameter that is related to a source of contaminant, a change to a Point of Impingement and all changes to information associated with a Modification to the Facility that satisfies Condition 2. 6

Major changes to the current template Added definition of NPC-300: 38.“Publication NPC-300” means the Ministry Publication NPC-300, “Environmental Noise Guideline, Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning, Publication NPC-300”, August 2013, as amended. (Delete if NPC-205 / NPC-232 applies.) 7

Major changes to the current template Split the current Condition 3 into Condition 3 and 4 and updated: 3.REQUIREMENT TO REQUEST AN ACCEPTABLE POINT OF IMPINGEMENT CONCENTRATION 3.1Prior to making a Modification to the Facility that satisfies Condition 2.1(a) and (b), the Company shall prepare a proposed update to the ESDM Report to reflect the proposed Modification. 3.2The Company shall request approval of an Acceptable Point of Impingement Concentration for a Compound of Concern if the Compound of Concern does not have a Ministry Point of Impingement Limit and [an update] or a proposed update to an ESDM Report indicates that one of the following changes with respect to the concentration of the Compound of Concern may occur: i.The Compound of Concern was not a Compound of Concern in the previous version of the ESDM Report and A.the concentration of the Compound of Concern is higher than the Jurisdictional Screening Level for the contaminant; or B.there is no Jurisdictional Screening Level for the contaminant. ii.The concentration of the Compound of Concern in the updated ESDM Report is higher than: A.the most recent Acceptable Point of Impingement Concentration, and B.the Jurisdictional Screening Level if a Jurisdictional Screening Level exists. 8

Major changes to the current template Condition 3.3 added due to definition “Maximum Concentration Level Assessment” removed: 3.3The request required by Condition 3.2 shall propose a concentration for the Compound of Concern and shall contain an assessment, performed by a Toxicologist, of the likelihood of the proposed concentration causing an adverse effect at Points of Impingement. Condition 3.9 added to reflect that Condition 3.1 is not an update to ESDM Report: 3.9If the Director approves the request, the Company shall update the ESDM Report to reflect the Modification. 9

Major changes to the current template 4PERFORMANCE LIMITS 4.1.Subject to Condition 4.2, the Company shall not discharge or cause or permit the discharge of a Compound of Concern into the air if, (a)the Compound of Concern has a Ministry Point of Impingement Limit and the discharge results in the concentration at a Point of Impingement exceeding the Ministry Point of Impingement Limit; or (b)the Compound of Concern does not have a Ministry Point of Impingement Limit and the discharge results in the concentration at a Point of Impingement exceeding the higher of, (i)if an Acceptable Point of Impingement Concentration exists the most recent Acceptable Point of Impingement Concentration, and (ii)the Jurisdictional Screening Level if a Jurisdictional Screening Level exists. 4.2Condition 4.1 does not apply if the Ministry Point of Impingement Limit has a 10-minute averaging period and no ambient monitor indicates an exceedance at a Point of Impingement where human activities regularly occur at a time when those activities regularly occur.

Major changes to the current template Changed Documentation Requirements: 5.DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 5.1The Company shall maintain an up-to-date Log. 5.2No later than March 31 in each year, the Company shall update the Acoustic Assessment Report and shall update the ESDM Report in accordance with section 26 of O. Reg. 419/05 so that the information in the reports is accurate as of December 31 in the previous year. 5.3The Company shall make the Emission Summary Table (see section 27 of O. Reg. 419/05) and Acoustic Assessment Summary Table available for examination by any person, without charge, by posting it on the Internet or by making it available during regular business hours at the Facility.

Major changes to the current template Reporting Requirements: 6.REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 6.1Subject to Condition 6.2, the Company shall provide the Director no later than March 31 (or another date) of each year, a Written Summary Form to be submitted through the Ministry’s website that shall include the following: (i)a declaration of whether the Facility was in compliance with section 9 of the EPA, O. Reg. 419/05 and the conditions of this Approval; (ii)a summary of each Modification satisfying Condition 2.1 (a) and (b) that took place in the previous calendar year that resulted in a change in the previously calculated concentration at a Point of Impingement for any Compound of Concern or resulted in a change in the sound levels reported in the Acoustic Assessment Summary Table at any Point of Reception.

Major changes to the current template Added Condition 8.1 (b): 8. COMPLAINTS RECORDING AND REPORTING If at any time, the Company receives an environmental complaint from the public regarding the operation of the Equipment approved by this Approval, the Company shall take the following steps: (a). Record and number each complaint, either electronically or in a log book. The record shall include the following information: the time and date of the complaint and incident to which the complaint relates, the nature of the complaint, wind direction at the time and date of the incident to which the complaint relates and, if known, the address of the complainant. (b).Notify the District Manager of the complaint as soon as practicable after the complaint is received. (c). Initiate appropriate steps to determine all possible causes of the complaint, and take the necessary actions to appropriately deal with the cause of the subject matter of the complaint. (d). Complete and retain an on-site a report written within one (1) week of the complaint date. The report shall list the actions taken to appropriately deal with the cause of the complaint and set out steps to be taken to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents.