3 (+) Target Objectives: Instructional Growth Objective: (propose one focus element from Standard 1, 2 or 3) Professional Growth Objective: (propose any.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information

Advertisements

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.

TEACHER EVALUATION UPDATE Center Grove Community School Corporation.

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Teacher Evaluation Update

THE KEEP PROCESS. ADMINISTRATION Use EDCS to assign evaluators to classroom teachers and leaders Send information from EDCS  KEEP.

EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.

OASYS TRAINING COLLECTING & SUBMITTING EVIDENCE. APPR 20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures Knowledge of Students & Student.

“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.

Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.

TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach

Rappin’ up the tgdc TGDC Update GREEN CHECK MADNESS! November 19, 2014.

ComprehensiveFocused  Evidence needs to be collected for all 27 components found in all 8 Criteria  Evidence needs to be collected in one of the 8 Criteria.

What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.

Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.

Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2014 Overview of Final Evaluation Report Administrator.

Formal Observation 2 per year (due by February 7 th & May 6th) all teacher formals (write up only) in a zip file to Melissa Kaplan, Ron Bauer, and.

Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.

TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.

 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve Student Achievement.

Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.

Earning Your Best Possible Rating. The observation cycle has been designed to incorporate the elements of the NEAT process into the post-observation.

 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.

Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

Educator Effectiveness Update September Training Outcomes Review the WPSD Evaluation System – Overall Focus – New & Modified Components – System.

What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.

The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

Branching Out September 26, Welcome Back! Where are we now? Where are we going? PLN! Introductions…

Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

From Mad River Schools Waiver Day Presentation May 15, 2013.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

Framework In Action: Theory into Practice

Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.

Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.

Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.

Education Unit The Practicum Experience – The CAP Process.

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.

Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.

AMITY REGION # 5 COMPLEMENTARY OBSERVERS Dr. E. Marie McPadden Ms. Helly Potter Ms. Jen Bshara February 25,

Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)

Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.

What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for

Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.

Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.

EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS

One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

Avon Grove School District October 2009

Teacher Evaluation Timeline

University Supervisors

CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

Teacher Performance Evaluation

Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System

Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle

State Board of Education Progress Update

Valley Central School District

T-TESS Student Growth Model PLC- April 25th & 26th

Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training

The Administrator’s View of a Staff Profile Page

Presentation transcript:

3 (+) Target Objectives: Instructional Growth Objective: (propose one focus element from Standard 1, 2 or 3) Professional Growth Objective: (propose any element from Standard 4 or 5) Data-Based Objective (Optional) Administrator-identified objective (Optional) Additional teacher-identified objective TGDC Protocols, p. 7

Enter your IPS dates here.

 The purpose is to provide further feedback on objectives of the Initial Planning Sheet and inform IPS next steps  A minimum of two informal growth plan visits completed before the end of the school year  Observer enters evidence on the platform and aligns it to elements observed  Can be invited by teacher or unannounced TGDC Protocols, p. 9

Formal Observations Informal Growth Plan Visits Supplemental Observations PurposeProvide feedback to teachers on all 15 focus elements Provide feedback to teachers on their IPS growth objectives Provide feedback to teachers on 11 or 15 focus elements Enter evidenceYes RatedYesNoYes Scheduled or UnannouncedScheduledBoth Number per year2At least 2Admin. discretion Lesson plan and pre-conference needed YesNoAdmin. discretion

TGDC Completion Dates Teacher Self-Assessment (Administrator can only see Completion) 9/5/2014 Initial Planning Sheet Submission 10/3/2014 (extended) Initial Planning Conference 10/17/2014 (extended) Informal Growth Plan Visits (At least 2 completed by 4/17/15) Sept – April Formal Observation Cycle 1 11/21/2014 Formal Observation Cycle 2 3/27/2015 Final Evaluation Report 5/4/2015