LA CORUNA, 8/9th JUNE 2006 UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti DIPARTIMENTO PER IL COORDINAMENTO DELLO SVILUPPO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
Advertisements

1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Environment and transport Lessons from the Italian ERDF Operational Programme for transport 1.The EU transport.
Environmental Protection Agency Montenegro. Competent Authority Since November 2006, The competent authority for environmental issues was the Ministry.
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
DG REGIO – Unit "Thematic Development" EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN 1 Transport and Regional Policy Transport and Regional Policy Patrick.
Planning and use of funding instruments
Implications for the Regions EU-Regional Policy 1 Governance White Paper Introduction Adoption of White Paper on European Governance, July 25, 2001 Aim:
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
1 Natura 2000, the Ecological Network of the European Union – opportunities for tourism Micheal OBriain Nature and Biodiversity Unit, DG Environment European.
ENEA, 12. September 2005 WWF Handbook and Score-card Presentation by Stefanie Lang,
Regional Policy Draft Guidance on ex-ante conditionalities Ad hoc expert meeting 6 March
The Cohesion Fund: Programming and link to the Structural Funds Annual Meeting of ISPA Partners 2003: From ISPA to Cohesion Fund and Structural Funds Angela.
The NATURE–SDIplus project Best Practice Network for SDI in Nature Conservation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO Co-funded.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Airport Sustainability is a holistic approach to managing an airport to ensure Economic viability, Operational efficiency, Natural resource conservation,
The Supreme Audit Office of the Czech Republic Department of Environment and Agriculture Biological Diversity as an Audit Subject for the Supreme Audit.
Claudia ZiosiSzeged, 16 April ALSO Strand Conference B Szeged, HUngary 16, 17 April 2006.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
PROYECTO NEREIDAS VISIÓN EUROPEA DE LOS PROYECTOS TEN-T ALEXIO PICCO – CIRCLE Malaga 03/04/2014.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
10. Workshop ERFP Uppsala, June 4, 2005 ERFP collaboration with EU - Lobbying in Bruxelles Hermann Schulte-Coerne.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
Conserving environmental assets whilst delivering economic growth Seminar: Making the economic case for environmental integration 23 February 2005.
CEEWEB Academy III Strengthening civil participation in the implementation of EU nature conservation directives through the experiences gained by the 10.
Integrated Projects Spetember 2013 Maja Mikosinska DG Environment European Commission.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
Environmental sustainability in Lombardy Anelisa Ricci Managing Director Unit “Reduction emissions in atmosphere and environmental Sustainability” Environment.
Seminar Sharing Experience of Environmental Integration ‘Moving Forward’ Vienna, 18 May 2005 Environment and integrated programming in Sicily: the Integrated.
Daniel Baláž, Ján Černecký State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Nature Conservation and River Monitoring in Slovakia.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
ECENA Exchange Programme First Plenary Meeting January, 2006 Zagreb, Croatia Update on strengthening the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental.
European Commission Environmental cooperation in the Mediterranean June 2009.
Spatial Planning in Germany Principles The preparation of spatial plans and their implementation are principally independent from each other. A town planning.
European Commission Biodiversity and Nature Conservation in the EU today – Business & Biodiversity Alexandra Vakrou, EC, DG Environment IEF European Roundtable.
Natura EU ambitions for a coherent ecological network State of Play and Challenges Saskia Richartz Institute for European Environmental Policy.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
2 nd Annual meeting Athens, January 2006 Legal Protection of Transitional Waters in Greece Dr. Petros Patronos / Dr. Vivi Roumeliotou Nomos + Physis.
BEtter management and implementation of NATURa 2000 sites Zsuzsa Fidlòczky Nimfea Environment and Nature Conservation Association (LP) Hungary Brussels,
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COHESION FUND (REGULATION 1164/94) MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS, FINANCED BY COHESION.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Environment education for achieving awareness for the role of renewable energy technologies in the districts, included in “Natura 2000” Gancho Mitev, eng.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
Protection assessment of Natura 2000 network areas in Poland – main problems Marzena Modrowska Krzysztof Suliński Ministry of the environment in Poland.
Short overview of the legal framework of protected sites and status of existing ecological networks in Serbia.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
SEPA AND EEA, FIVE YEARS OF COOPERATION
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
A new financial instrument
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Technical guidance in relation to the non-energy extractive industry
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
Natura 2000 and river basin management
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
The – new – LIFE program (Integrated Projects)
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
EU strategy on invasive alien species
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration
Presentation transcript:

LA CORUNA, 8/9th JUNE 2006 UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti DIPARTIMENTO PER IL COORDINAMENTO DELLO SVILUPPO DEL TERRITORIO, IL PERSONALE ED I SERVIZI GENERALI DIREZIONE GENERALE PER LA PROGRAMMAZIONE E I PROGRAMMI EUROPEI AUTORITÀ DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES CONCERNING OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME TRANSPORT

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Agenda ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES CONCERNING OP TRANSPORT Introduction: 2 MAIN ISSUES Managing Authority/Environmental Authority Partnership Environmental issues and projects selection process Monitoring environmental impacts during the OP implementation: environmental indicators Major Projects and Natural habitats (Natura 2000) The OP Transport and the Regional Operational Programmes in Objective 1 Area: evaluation of environment related impacts of infrastructure projects

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Introduction: 2 main issues first main issue The first main issue regarding the OP Transport framework concerns the full compliance to the fixed ratio 60/40% between rail interventions as a whole (rail lines network, nodes and light rail) and road interventions. At present, such ratio is fully accomplished. Anyway, besides ratios, also qualitative variables should be taken into account, some of which already used as selection criteria applied to projects on roads to be selected within the Programme, such as: second issue The second issue looks at the future. Selecting the projects on the basis of criteria or evaluating the impacts in the projects designing phase is as important as evaluating them in the construction and operating phases. landscape design low level of environmental impacts scarce incidence on the Natura 2000 Network, in terms of areas occupied by roads and potential unused.

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Introduction: 2 main issues Accordingly, on the bases of 7 projects selected as pilot, the Italian Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport, in accordance with the National and the Regional Agencies for the Environmental Protection (APAT and ARPA), is planning to develop methodologies and practices (Guidelines) to be attached to tenders and bids drafts issued during the next programming period ( ). Such projects are: Catania Airport SS131 Carlo Felice – S. Giusta section A3 Persano and A3 Macrolotto 1 SS106 Jonica –lots n. 8 and 9 Cervaro – Orsara railway In order to achieve this, a Conventional Agreement is going to be signed, which will be financed by the OP Technical Assistance. Such an initiative shows how much environment is central within the transport policy for Southern Italy. Lets switch now to the description of the environmental issues concerning the Operational Programme Transport.

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Managing Authority/Environmental Authority Partnership Since the first steps moved by the Operational Programme Transport, a structured relationship between Managing Authority and Environmental Authority has been established. Moreover, the two bodies have signed an Operative Plan for Systematic Cooperation providing a framework and specific tasks in which they would have worked together in implementing the OP, ensuring its compliance to environmental strategies (especially with Italy engagement in reaching Kyoto Protocol aims). Accordingly, the Environmental Authority: produced an ex ante evaluation of the Operation Programme; cooperated to the project selection phase; cooperate to definition and analysis of environmental impact of OP intervention; took part to all held Monitoring Committee; participated at Mid Term Review Process; ensured its participation to the annual meeting with the Commission.

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Managing Authority/Environmental Authority Partnership During the first period of implementation, Ministry of Infrastructures and Transport established a strong relationship with Environmental Authority and Environment Ministry. It has been established a cooperation with technical assistance (PwC) in solving procedural problems about Habitat and Birds directives compliance declarations for Major Projects. Key issue on Managing Authority and Environmental Authority partnership

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Environmental issues and projects selection process Projects involving Structural Funds must ensure a sustainable development and the conserving of natural habitats and wild fauna and flora in the territory of Member States. They must also be compliant to Community Regulations concerning environment. Priority is given, in projects implementation process, to EC Directives concerning environment and to ensure that their aims are reached, in order to fill the gap in the implementation of the Regulatory framework. For what concerns the goal of environmental impacts reduction, actions must be taken both in the programming and projecting phases, where impacts on environment have to be taken into account and activities to provide the environment (including air pollution, noise effects and the potential impacts on landscape and visual amenity) with permanent protection have been planned. As for the OP Transport, as shown in slide 14, environmental sustainability is one of the eligibility criteria for projects selection within the Programme.

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Environmental issues and projects selection process According to the priority given from EU rulers to environmental impacts reduction, the selection process within the OP Transport have ensured the financial resources concentration on projects which are compliant to the aim of sustainable development. Moreover, with the aim of ensuring that every project plays its own part in reaching the environmental goals, ad hoc environmental indicators have been used as a guideline for projects selection. Such indicators have been referred to the different environmental identified themes (air pollution, biodiversity, noise, natural habitats and wild fauna and flora), and will be also used in the monitoring process which follows the Programme and the projects implementation.

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Monitoring environmental impacts during the OP implementation: environmental indicators The above mentioned indicators have been reviewed in partnership by both the OP Managing and Environmental Authorities, starting out from the evaluation of projects expected environmental impacts as indicated within the Community Support Framework (CSF). Expected impacts have been set out from the OP Transport Ex ante environmental evaluation (updated to 31/12/2002), concerning: Air (including also noise) Water Land preservation Waste Natural Habitats Urban environment Landscape, visual intrusion, loss of important sites (archaeological, historical, etc)

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Monitoring environmental impacts during the OP implementation: environmental indicators Specific indicators have been set out for each of the above listed environmental themes in order to express the proper impact. They are divided into: Programme Indicators, allowing the drafting of a framework of global environmental impacts at the Programme level. Programme indicators have been estimated by the Environmental Authority in March 2006: 1. Air Pollutants Emissions (CO2, NOx, SOx, COV) for each mode of transport; Emission levelImpact of OP CO 2 +1,8% SO x - 0,16% NO x +0,15% COV- 3,5%

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Monitoring environmental impacts during the OP implementation: environmental indicators 2. Reduction of air pollution level in urban areas through traffic diversion from road to rail: CO2 emissions: - 9,1%; substantial reduction of NOx and COV emissions; total absence of PM10 emissions. 3. Number of Natura 2000areas affected by the projects: 17 areas affected, in 14 of which projects to be realised are proven to be compliant to Directives on Natura 2000 network (see following slides). Measures Indicators, coming from the aggregation of indicators measured for projects within a single financing line, as far as they can be summed up. Projects Indicators, proposed at projects level and based on the data vailable form Environmental Evaluations of projects imposed by the national laws on public works realization. They provide detailed information on environmental impacts of single projects

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Major Projects and Natural habitats (Natura 2000) The European Union is seeking to ensure biodiversity by conserving natural habitats and wild fauna and flora in the territory of the Member States. An ecological network of special protected areas, known as "Natura 2000", is being set up for this purpose. The network is given coherence by other activities involving monitoring and surveillance, reintroduction of native species, introduction of non- native species, research and education. Habitat Directive and Birds Directive The continuing deterioration of natural habitats and the threats posed to certain species are one of the main concerns of European Union (EU) environment policy. Directive 92/43/EEC, known as the Habitats Directive, is intended to help maintain biodiversity in the Member States by defining a common framework for the conservation of wild plants and animals and habitats of Community interest. The Directive establishes a European ecological network known as "Natura 2000". The network comprises "special areas of conservation" designated by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Directive 92/43 and special protection areas classified pursuant to Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds (Birds Directive).

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Major Projects and Natural habitats (Natura 2000) Habitat Directive and Birds Directive ( follows ) Special areas of conservation are designated in three stages. Following the criteria set out in the annexes, each Member State must draw up a list of sites hosting natural habitats and wild fauna and flora. On the basis of the national lists and by agreement with the Member States, the Commission will then adopt a list of sites of Community importance. Member States must take all necessary measures to guarantee the conservation of habitats in special areas of conservation, and to avoid their deterioration. The Directive provides for co-financing of conservation measures by the Community. Member States must also: encourage the management of features of the landscape which are essential for the migration, dispersal and genetic exchange of wild species; establish systems of strict protection for those animal and plant species which are particularly threatened (Annex IV) and study the desirability of reintroducing those species in their territory; prohibit the use of non-selective methods of taking, capturing or killing certain animal and plant species (Annex V).

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Major Projects and Natural habitats (Natura 2000) – Catania Airport

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport Major Projects and Natural habitats (Natura 2000) – A3 Motorway

UNIONE EUROPEA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA AUTORITA DI GESTIONE DEL PON TRASPORTI Environmental issues related to OP Transport The OP Transport and the Regional Operational Programmes in Objective 1 Area: evaluation of environment related impacts of infrastructure projects A study promoted within the CSF is going to be made in order to obtain a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of environmental impacts of transport-related projects financed within the OP Transport and the Regional Programmes in Obj.1 Area. The very heart of the study is the mapping of over 500 involved projects on a geo- referenced system, which will allow the: estimate of some of the environmental impacts of the examined projects (e.g. the number of the exposed population), with the reference to focus areas (Catania and Naples urban areas and the Adriatic Corridor) with the aim to evaluate sinergies / antagonism between the different projects; matching the projects network with the special protected areas network in order to evaluate projects impacts in a network vision.