DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Emergency Transfer Criteria NYSRC Reliability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

NERC TPL Standard Issues TSS Meeting #146 Seattle, WA August 15-17, 2007 Chifong Thomas.
WECC Operating Committee and Planning Coordinating Committee Brian K. Keel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee June 18 & 19, 2009 WECC Reliability Subcommittee.
POTF Status update.
NERC Footnote b / 12 – Load Loss
Reliability Subcommittee Report Vishal C. Patel Chair – Reliability Subcommittee March 2014.
Al McBride MANAGER, AREA TRANSMISSION PLANNING Existing Import Interfaces: Transmission Transfer Capabilities and The Calculation of Tie Benefits DECEMBER.
Goshen Area Bus Reconfiguration
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FERC’s Order on Possible BSM for ROS.
Tucson Area Reliability Mike Flores Control Area Operations Tucson Electric Power May 2000.
System Operator Conference NERC Standards Review for: Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS.
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
1 If I were to give grades today… > 80A A B B B C C C D D D-1
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
ERCOT Compliance Audits Robert Potts Sr. Reliability Analyst March 23, 2005.
FRCC Seasonal Transmission Assessment & Operational Seasonal Study Winter 2012.
Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities Paul Johnson Chair of the Determine Facility Ratings Standard Drafting Team An Overview of the.
ERCOT SOL Methodology for the Planning and Operations Horizons Stephen Solis 2014 OTS 1.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
March 2003 Operations Summary Bill Blevins Manager Operations Engineering.
WECC Path Concept Task Force Report to PCC March 26, 2014 Chifong Thomas.
December 7, 2012 ERCOT Planning Horizon SOL Methodology Update Jeff Billo RPG.
APPA RELIABILITY STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE SYMPOSIUM Case Study: City Utilities of Springfield, MO January 11, 2007.
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
1 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW NETWORK OPERATING COMMITTEE April 17, 2007 New Mexico Transmission System Overview.
Reliability Requirements Bill Blevins Manager of Operations Support ERCOT.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Generation assets important to the reliable operation of the Bulk Electric System What does this mean?
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ RTP: Cascade Analysis April 21, 2015.
Transmission Equivalence Richard V. Kowalski Manager, Transmission Planning ISO New England.
SM April Peak Week Operations Review Presentation to ISO Business Issues Committee May 22, 2002.
Responding to post contingency overloads, IROL’s and SOL’s Art Gardiner – CPS Energy Steve Rainwater - LCRA 1.
Jones Creek Project Submitted to RPG on July 7, 2014 July 22, 2014 Regional Planning Group Meeting.
1 New York State Reliability Council …….. Promoting Electric System Reliability in New York State Presentation to the MEUA Annual Meeting September.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
COMPLIANCE UPDATE ERCOT ROS Meeting April 9, 2002.
Managing of Limits during Loss of Analysis Tools/ EMS April 23, 2014.
Grid Reliability Metrics by Jim Dyer Electric Power Group, LLC January 29, 2004 Washington, DC Transmission Reliability Research Review.
Operating Guide and Planning Guide Revision Requests Blake Williams, ROS Chair September 13, 2012.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
Current Operational Challenges Computing the West – North Limits Potential IROLs Local Voltage & Thermal issue (OOME) High Voltage Outages.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
June 26, 2008 Technical Advisory Committee American Electric Power Service Corporation Presidio Area Reliability Improvements Project James Teixeira Manager,
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
1 NPCC – A-2 Dr. Mayer Sasson Transmission Planning Consolidated Edison of New York June 1, 2006 Presented to the NYSRC-RRS.
Project WECC-0100 Standards Briefing WECC-0100 SDT April 7, 2016 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Bert Peters Chair, Path Operator Task Force
Chapter 8. Electrical Systems
Calvert City Power I, L.L.C. (“Calvert”) Purpose of Meeting
NERC Lessons Learned Summary
Southern Cross Directives Planning Items
Phase Angle Limitations
Western Electricity Coordinating Council
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017
HARRY ALLEN TRANSFORMER REMEDIAL ACTION SCHEME (RAS)
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Chapter 8. Electrical Systems
Market Rules Assessment Comparison of RTC & RTD - PJM
HARRY ALLEN TRANSFORMER REMEDIAL ACTION SCHEME (RAS)
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Palo Verde-COI RAS Retirement
Planning Meeting November 4, 2010 Marv Landauer.
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
Bert Peters Chair, Path Operator Task Force
Presentation transcript:

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Emergency Transfer Criteria NYSRC Reliability Compliance Monitoring Subcommittee December 2, 2014 Albany, NY Aaron Markham Manager Grid- Operations New York Independent System Operator

2 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Background  The NYISO was asked to discuss recent instances of Emergency Transfer Criteria (ETC) Declaration  This Presentation will walk through ETC as defined in the NYISO Emergency Operations Manual (EOM)  It will give real world examples of ETC from June of 2014  The objective of the NYISO is to operate the NYS Power System within the Normal State. When the NYS Power System enters a condition other than the Normal State, the NYISO shall act to return the NYS Power System to the Normal State. (NYISO Emergency Operations Manual section 1.2.2)

3 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY NYSRC Definition of Emergency Transfer Criteria (ETC)  Emergency Transfer Criteria - It is intended that the NYS Bulk Power System be operated within normal transfer criteria at all times insofar as possible. However, in the event that adequate facilities are not available to supply firm load within normal transfer criteria, emergency transfer criteria may be invoked. Under emergency transfer criteria, transfers may be increased up to, but not exceed, emergency ratings and limits as follows: a. Pre-contingency line and equipment loadings may be operated up to Long Term Emergency (LTE) ratings for up to four (4) hours, provided the Short Term Emergency (STE) ratings are set appropriately. Otherwise, pre- contingency line and equipment loadings must be within normal ratings. Pre-contingency voltages and transmission interface flows must be within applicable pre-contingency voltage and stability limits. b. Post-contingency line and equipment loadings within STE ratings. Post- contingency voltages and transmission interface flows must be within applicable post-contingency voltage and stability limits.

4 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Pre-Contingency (Actual) flow Criteria  NYISO Emergency Operations Manual Section 2.2, Alert State  Emergency Transfer Criteria are invoked: Actual loading of equipment defined as the NYISO Secured Transmission System or the NERC Bulk Electric System is greater than Normal rating but less than or equal to LTE rating for greater than 30 minutes and may exist up to four continuous hours (or such longer period as may be established by the Rating Authority)  NYISO takes actions applicable to the Alert State to return to the Normal State  No cases existed in June 2014

5 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Pre-Contingency (Actual) flow Criteria (cont)  NYISO Emergency Operations Section 3.2, Major Emergency State  Emergency Transfer Criteria are invoked: A transmission facility, which constitutes a part of the NYISO Secured Transmission System or the NERC Bulk Electric System remains loaded above its Normal rating, but equal to or less than its LTE rating for more than four continuous hours or such longer period as may be established by the Rating Authority  NYISO takes actions applicable to the Major Emergency State to return to the Normal State  No cases existed in June 2014

6 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Single Circuit Post Contingency Flow Criteria  NYISO EO Section 2.2, Alert State  Emergency Transfer Criteria are invoked: Predicted flow of equipment defined as the NYISO Secured Transmission System or the NERC Bulk Electric System is greater than Short-Term Emergency (STE) rating and corrective action could be taken to reduce the flows under STE in 5 minutes and under LTE within 10 minutes following the contingency AND predicted flow has not exceeded its STE rating for greater than 30 minutes  No cases existed in June 2014

7 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Single Circuit Post Contingency Flow Criteria (cont)  NYISO EO Section 3.2, Major Emergency State  Emergency Transfer Criteria are invoked: A transmission facility which constitutes a part of the NYISO Secured Transmission System or the NERC Bulk Electric System remains at a loading level for greater than 30 minutes, which would cause its Short-Term Emergency (STE) rating to be exceeded following a contingency, or  Emergency Transfer Criteria are invoked: A transmission facility which constitutes a part of the NYISO Secured Transmission System or the NERC Bulk Electric System becomes loaded to a level that would cause its STE rating to be violated and corrective action could not be taken rapidly enough to meet the requirements, under STE in 5 minutes and under LTE within 10 minutes of initial overload, once the contingency occurs.  No cases existed in June of 2014

8 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Tower or Stuck Circuit Breaker Post Contingency Flow Criteria  NYISO Emergency Operations Manual Section 2.2, Alert State  Emergency Transfer Criteria are invoked: Post Contingency flow may exceed STE rating for tower and stuck circuit breaker contingencies  This allows the NYISO not to declare a Major Emergency  Examples in June of 2014  (2) 62 Niagara-Packard for loss of common tower 61 Niagara-Packard/ 64 Niagara- Robinson Rd (NYSRC Exception 13 allows operation of the Niagara Exit circuits up to STE)  (1) 61 Niagara-Packard for loss of common tower 62 Niagara –Packard/ BP76 Beck Packard Rd (NYSRC Exception 13 allows operation of the Niagara Exit circuits up to STE)

9 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Procedure for Relief of Potential Overloads on Non-Secured Facilities, EOM Section The NYISO does monitor the non secured system to account for the impact on the secured system In cases where the initiating contingency will case the non secured system to exceed STE, the NYISO will treat the initiating contingency and the facility predicted to be over STE as a single contingency When appropriate the NYISO will declare ETC on the underlying system Examples in June of 2014 (4) 142 Dunkirk-Gardenville 115kV for loss of common tower 73 & 74 Dunkirk- Gardenville 230 kV and 141 Dunkirk-Gardenville 115kV (1) 969 Border City-Guardian 115kV for loss of 85/87 Wethersfield-Meyer 230kV and 934 South Perry-Meyer 115 kV (1) 969 Border City-Guardian 115kV for loss of common tower 7 Homer City- Stolle Rd 345kV/67 Stolle Rd-High Sheldon 230kV and 934 South Perry-Meyer 115 kV

10 © 2014 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY