Network Analysis and Synthesis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAPLACE TRANSFORMS.
Advertisements

化工應用數學 Complex Algebra 授課教師: 林佳璋.
10.1 Complex Numbers Definition:
Synthesis of one-port networks with two kinds of elements
Chapter 8 Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Lecture 141 EEE 302 Electrical Networks II Dr. Keith E. Holbert Summer 2001.
Fundamentals of Electric Circuits Chapter 14
Network Analysis and Synthesis
EXAMPLE 3 Use addition of complex numbers in real life Electricity Circuit components such as resistors,inductors, and capacitors all oppose the flow of.
1. a < b means a is less than b
LIAL HORNSBY SCHNEIDER
Chapter 1 Equations, Inequalities, and Mathematical Models 1.4 Complex Numbers.
Series and Parallel AC Circuits
Differential Equations
Chapter 3 Limits and the Derivative
IMPEDANCE Matching.
Solve the equation. 2(x + 7)2 = 16.
THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM LEARNING GOALS Definition The transform maps a function of time into a function of a complex variable Two important singularity functions.
Fundamentals of Electric Circuits Chapter 11
Solving Quadratic Equations.
Sinusoidal Steady-state Analysis Complex number reviews Phasors and ordinary differential equations Complete response and sinusoidal steady-state response.
Lecture 8 Periodic Structures Image Parameter Method
Sistem Kontrol I Kuliah II : Transformasi Laplace Imron Rosyadi, ST 1.
§ 7.7 Complex Numbers. Blitzer, Intermediate Algebra, 5e – Slide #3 Section 7.7 Complex Numbers The Imaginary Unit i The imaginary unit i is defined.
Equations of Lines Chapter 8 Sections
Relations And Functions. A relation from non empty set A to a non empty set B is a subset of cartesian product of A x B. This is a relation The domain.
Prerequisites: Fundamental Concepts of Algebra
Introduction  The fundamental passive linear circuit elements are the  resistor (R),  capacitor (C)  inductor (L).  These circuit.
Partial-fraction Expansion
Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 3 Polynomial and Rational Functions Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005 Pearson Education, Inc.
1 Inverse Laplace Transform Note that most of the transforms are written as fractions.
Chapter 2 Laplace Transform 2.1 Introduction The Laplace transform method can be used for solving linear differential equations. Laplace transforms can.
Unit 8 Phasors.
College Algebra Sixth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
Synthesis of R-L-C Networks EE484 – presentation Janghoon, Cho.
Network Analysis and Synthesis
College Algebra Sixth Edition James Stewart Lothar Redlin Saleem Watson.
Zero of Polynomial Functions Factor Theorem Rational Zeros Theorem Number of Zeros Conjugate Zeros Theorem Finding Zeros of a Polynomial Function.
Chapter 7 The Laplace Transform
1. Simplify 3 4 – ANSWER 11 Solve the equation. 2. 3x2 + 8 = 23 ANSWER
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved Inequalities 2. Equations and Inequalities.
Applied Circuit Analysis Chapter 12 Phasors and Impedance Copyright © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Chapter 2 Section 4 Complex Numbers.
7.1 Root Locus (RL) Principle We introduce the RL through an example. Consider servo motor system shown bellow The closed loop transfer function is motor.
Algebra 2 Complex Numbers Lesson 4-8 Part 1. Goals Goal To identify, graph, and perform operations with complex numbers. Rubric Level 1 – Know the goals.
DR S. & S.S. GHANDHY ENGINEENRING COLLEGE SUBJECT:- ADVANCE ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CODE : Topic : Laplace Transform.
Complex Numbers and Equation Solving 1. Simple Equations 2. Compound Equations 3. Systems of Equations 4. Quadratic Equations 5. Determining Quadratic.
Class 3 Linear System Solution Using the Laplace Transform
Initial Conditions & Passive Network Synthesis. Sarvajanik College of Engineering & Technology Made by: Dhruvita Shah Khushbu Shah
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 6. TRANSIENT RESPONSE -- STABILITY Pusan National University Intelligent.
EXAMPLE 3 Use addition of complex numbers in real life Electricity Circuit components such as resistors,inductors, and capacitors all oppose the flow of.
LAPLACE TRANSFORMS.
Lesson 12: Transfer Functions In The Laplace Domain
Sinusoidal Excitation of Circuits
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Mathematical Modeling of Control Systems
Learning Outcomes After completing this ppt the student will be able to: Make and interpret a basic Routh table to determine the stability of a system.
Effects of Zeros and Additional Poles
Complex Frequency and Laplace Transform
1. Simplify 3 4 – ANSWER 11 Solve the equation. 2. 3x2 + 8 = 23 ANSWER
Time-Domain Analysis of Control Systems (3)
Fundamentals of Electric Circuits Chapter 14
CHAPTER 7 Alternating Current Bridge.
Network Analysis and Synthesis
Mathematical Models of Control Systems
CHAPTER 4 Laplace Transform. EMT Signal Analysis.
Apply KCL to the top node ,we have We normalize the highest derivative by dividing by C , we get Since the highest derivative in the equation is.
Chapter 2 Modeling in the Frequency Domain
Chapter 6. STABILITY Good relationships nurture you. They help you find yourself and who you are. I don’t mean just relationships with boys or men. Relationships.
THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM LEARNING GOALS Definition
Presentation transcript:

Network Analysis and Synthesis Chapter 4 Synthesis of deriving point functions (one port networks)

Elementary Synthesis procedures The basic philosophy behind the synthesis of driving-point functions is to break up a positive real (p.r.) function Z(s) into a sum of simpler p.r. functions Z1(s), Z2(s) . . . Zn(s). Then to synthesize these individual Zi(s) as elements of the overall network whose dp impedance is

Breaking up process One important restriction is that all Zi(s) must be positive real. If we were given all the Zi(s), we could synthesize a network whose driving point impendance is Z(s) by simply connecting the Zi(s) in series. However, if we were to start from Z(s) alone, how do we decompose Z(s) into Zi(s)?

Removing a pole at s=0 If there is a pole at s=0, we can write Q(s) as Hence, Z(s) becomes Z1(s) is a capacitor. We know Z1(s) is positive real, is Z2(s) positive real?

Is Z2(s) positive real? The poles of Z2(s) are also poles of Z1(s), hence, Z2(s) doesn’t’ have poles on the right hand side of the s plane and no multiple poles on the jw axis. Satisfies the first 2 properties of p.r. functions. What about Re(Z2(jw))? Since Z(s) is p.r. Re(Z2(jw))=Re(Z(jw))>0. Hence, Z2(s) is p.r.

Removing a pole at s=∞ If Z(s) has a pole at s=∞, we can write Z(s) as Using a similar argument as previous we can show that Z2(s) is p.r. Z1(s) is an inductor.

Removing complex conjugate poles on the jw axis. If Z(s) has complex conjugate poles on the jw axis, Z(s) can be expanded into Note that Hence, Z2(s) is p.r.

Removing a constant K If Re(Z(jw)) is minimum at some point wi and if Re(Z(jw)) = Ki as shown in the figure We can remove that Ki as Z2(s) is p.r. This is essentially removing a resistor.

Constructing Assume that using one of the removal processes discussed we expanded Z(s) into Z1(s) and Z2(s). We connect Z1(s) and Z2(s) in series as shown on the figure.

Example 1 Synthesize the following p.r. function Solution: Note that we have a pole at s=0. Lets remove it Note that 2/s is a capacitor, while s/(s+3) is a parallel connection of a resistor and an inductor.

2/s is a capacitor with C=1/2. While s/(s+3) is a R=1 connected in parallel with an inductor L=1/3.

Example 2 Synthesis the following p.r. function Solution Note that there are no poles on s=0 or s=∞ or jw axis. Lets find the minimum of Re(Y(jw))

Note that minimum of Re(Y(jw))=1/2. Lets remove it ½ is a conductance in parallel with Y2(s)= Note that Y2(s) is a conductance 1/3 in series with an inductor 3/2.

Exercise Synthesize the following p.r. function.

Synthesis of one port networks with two kinds of elements In this section we will focus on the synthesis of networks with only L-C, R-C or R-L elements. The deriving point impedance/admittance of these kinds of networks have special properties that makes them easy to synthesize.

1. L-C imittance functions These networks have only inductors and capacitors. Hence, the average power consumed in these kind of networks is zero. (Because an inductor and a capacitor don’t dissipate energy.) If we have an L-C deriving point impedance Z(s) M1 and M2 even parts N1 and N2 odd parts

The average power dissipated by the network is

Properties of L-C function The driving point impedance/admittance of an L-C network is even/odd or odd/even. Both are Hurwitz, hence only simple imaginary zeros and poles on the jw axis. Poles and zeros interlace on the jw axis. Highest power of the numerator and denominator may only differ by 1. Either a zero or a pole at origin or infinity.

Synthesis of L-C networks There are two kinds of network realization types for two element only networks. Foster and Cauer

Foster synthesis Uses decomposition of the given F(s) into simpler two element impedances/admittances. For an L-C network with system function F(s), it can be written as This is because F(s) has poles on the jw axis only.

Using the above decomposition, we can realize F(s) as For a driving point impedance For a driving point admittance

Example Synthesize as driving point impedance and admittance. Solution: Decompose F(s) into simpler forms

For driving point impedance For driving point admittance

Cauer synthesis Uses partial fraction expansion method. It is based on removing pole at s=∞. Since the degree of the numerator and denominator differ by only 1, there is either a pole at s=∞ or a zero at s=∞. If a pole at s=∞, then we remove it. If a zero at s=∞, first we inverse it and remove the pole at s=∞.

Case 1: pole at s=∞ In this case, F(s) can be written as

This expansion can easily be realized as

Case 2: zero at s=∞ In this case will have a pole at s=∞. We synthesize G(s) using the procedure in the previous step. Remember that if F(s) is an impedance function, G(s) will be an admittance function and vice versa.

Example Using Cauer realization synthesize Solution: This is an impedance function. We have a pole at s=∞, hence, we should remove it.

If we were given Y(s) instead our realization would be

R-C driving point impedance/ R-L admittance R-C impedance and R-L admittance driving point functions have the same properties. By replacing the inductor in LC by a resistor an R-C driving point impedance or R-L driving point admittance, it can be written as Where

Properties of R-C impedance or R-L admittance functions Poles and zeros lie on the negative real axis. The singularity nearest origin must be a pole and a zero near infinity. The residues of the poles must be positive and real. Poles and zeros must alternate on the negative real axis.

Synthesis of R-C impedance or R-L admittance Foster In foster realization we decompose the function into simple imittances according to the poles. That is we write F(s) as For R-C impedance

For R-L admittance

Example Synthesize as R-C impedance and R-L admittance in foster realization. Solution: Note that the singularity near origin is a pole and a zero near infinity. The poles and zeros alternate We can expand F(s) as R-C impedance

R-L admittance

Cauer realization Cauer realization uses continued fraction expansion. For R-C impedance and R-L admittance we remove a resistor first. Then invert and remove a capacitor Then invert and remove a resistor . . .

Example Synthesize using Cauer realization as R-C impedance and R-L admittance. Solution: Note that the singularity near origin is a pole. The singularity near infinity is a zero. The zeros and the poles alternate. Note that the power of the numerator and denominator is equal, hence, we remove the resistor first. F(s) is R-L impedance or R-C admittance

For R-L admittance For R-C impedance

R-L impedance/R-C admittance R-L impedance deriving point function and R-C admittance deriving point function have the same property. If F(s) is R-L impedance or R-C admittance, it can be written as

Properties of R-L impedance/R-C admittance Poles and zeros are located on the negative real axis and they alternate. The nearest singularity near origin is zero. The singularity near infinity is a pole. The residues of the poles must be real and negative. Because the residues are negative, we can’t use standard decomposition method to synthesize.

Synthesis of R-L impedance and R-C admittance Foster If F(s) is R-L impedance d.p or R-C admittance d.p function. We can write it as Because of the third property of R-L impedance/R-C admittance d.p. functions, we can’t decompose F(s) into synthesizable components with the way we were using till now. We have to find a new way where the residues wont be negative.

If we divide F(s) by s, we get Note that this is a standard R-C impedance d.p. function, hence, the residues of the poles of F(s)/s will be positive. Once we find Ki and σi we multiply by s and draw the foster realization.

Example Synthesize as R-L impedance and R-C admittance using Foster realization. Solution: Note that the singularity near origin is a zero. The singularity near infinity is a pole. The zeros and the poles alternate. F(s) is R-L impedance or R-C admittance

We divide F(s) by s.

R-L impedance R-C admittance

Cauer realization Using continued fractional expansion We first remove R0. To do this we use fractional expansion method by focusing on removing the lowest s term first. We write N(s) and M(s) starting with the lowest term first.

Example Synthesize as R-L impedance and R-C admittance using Cauer realization. Solution: We write P(s) and M(s) as

R-L impedance R-C admittance