NASPAA Accreditation Serving on a Site Visit Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Evaluator 101: An Introduction to Serving as a MSCHE Evaluator Dr. Luis G. Pedraja MSCHE Vice President.
No Time Like the Present: Preparing for (INSERT YOUR LHDs NAME) for National Accreditation.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
CAEP–State Partnerships: New Agreements, New Opportunities 2013 AACTE Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Mark Lacelle-Peterson, CAEP Senior Vice President.
Stepping Up with PARCC All students deserve access to a world-class education that will prepare them for success in college and careers. To work toward.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
An Overview. HVAC Excellence was founded as a not for profit organization in 1994 to improve the technical workforce of the HVACR industry through quality.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Stepping Out! All students deserve access to a world-class education that will prepare them for success in college and careers. To work toward that goal,
NASPAA Accreditation The Logic Model: Linking All Standards from Mission through Assessment.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2.
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as a process. InputsOutputs Outcomes Inputs  Classrooms  Syllabi  Library resources  PhD faculty  … Outputs 
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as an outcome.
NASPAA Accreditation Why seek accreditation?. To improve the program Contributions to advancing knowledge and practice.
NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.
Group Mentoring Program Mentor & Mentee Preparation for Mentoring Helping People Succeed.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Institutional Assessment Day: Program-Level Alumni Survey Data August 19, 2014 Pat Hulsebosch Associate Provost – Office of Academic Quality Rosanne Bangura.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
©SHRM 2008 Pennsylvania State Leadership Conference Phyllis Shurn-Hannah NE Field Services Director (DE, MD, NJ, PA)
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
October 2, 2010 Las Vegas NASPAA S ITE V ISITOR T RAINING.
The Unit of Academic Accreditation Coordinator of the Male Section: Dr. Adel Saker Al-Khasawnah EXT.....
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
Dolina Dowling December 2010 Presentations 2, 3 1
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Program Standards for Bilingual Authorization Jo A. Birdsell, Ed.D. Commission on Teacher Credentialing Technical Assistance Meetings November 21 & 25,
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
BIR Update Sessions: General Updates January-February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
TSHM Docent Training Session 2 Docenting Methods.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Equality improvement in Children’s Services. Debby Mckechnie.
Seminar Objectives for Tonight Unit 5 feedback and questions Review Unit 6 assignments/discussion questions Unit 6: Business Strategy and Multi-business.
Performance Development Reviews All Classified, Non-Classified, and FEAP employees have performance development reviews completed on a fiscal year basis.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Domain Site Visit Team Orientation Office of Quality Performance and Accreditation.
Week 2: Interviews. Definition and Types  What is an interview? Conversation with a purpose  Types of interviews 1. Unstructured 2. Structured 3. Focus.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Are you eligible? Are you ready?
Orientation for New Site Visitors
Curriculum and Accreditation
Clarifying Roles of Leaders New Board of Directors
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
ENQA Agency Reviews – main changes from the old review process
Faculty Serving on Visiting Teams
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Accreditation 2016 A student’s guide.
Session 6 2:30pm-4:00pm Site Visitor Training Facilitators:
Julia Pheifer, MS Occupational Therapy
Presentation transcript:

NASPAA Accreditation Serving on a Site Visit Team

You are the of COPRA. &

Are you ready?  Do you want to contribute to the profession?  Are you a practicing professional in the field who has completed accreditation/site visit training? or  Are you an academic who has completed training?  Do you have the time?  Do you have the support of your organization?  For international SVT’s, do you have fluency in the language, cultural competency, or working knowledge of higher education in the program’s country?

Prepare  Read  COPRA’s policies and the Guide for Site Visitors  the Program’s eligibility application  COPRA’s response to the Eligibility application  SSR  IR  Program response to the IR  the program’s website  Participate in a conference call with the SV Chair  Write open-ended questions for you to ask on site

Do  Reveal potential, perceived conflicts of interest  Explore and inquire: Watch, look and listen  Seek consistency between documents and interviews  Respond to COPRA’s requests to the SVT in its IR  Clarify and verify the SSR for all standards  Present evidence that supports your entries in the SVTR  Attempt to understand processes and outcomes from the perspective of the program’s mission  Be collegial, supportive, and cooperative

Do not  Significantly interrupt day-to-day routine of the program  Say that a program met or not met a standard  Write something in the SVT Report unless you link it to a Standard  Assume the program is hiding something  Tell a program what to do and how to do it  Disclose information about the SSR or SV  Delay in writing your section of the SVTR

The chair  Leads, organizes, schedules and speaks for the SVT  Is the SVT’s liaison to COPRA, soliciting background from COPRA’s liaison to the program  Is the liaison to the program  Asks for additional information, if necessary  Ensures the program understands the reason for and mechanics of a site visit  Is responsible for ensuring a comprehensive and thorough evaluation and report

Additional resources Powerpoints: accreditation.naspaa.org/resources accreditation.naspaa.org/for-site-visitors If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to: accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions

…is not only about voluntarily conforming to standards set by NASPAA for educational programs in public service. … is also about pursuing excellence in public service through education by executing well on a mission- based strategy.