NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TASK FORCE CALL TO ARMS Henninger High School 2012.
Advertisements

Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
1 General Education Assessment at Cleveland State University What We Have Accomplished What We Have Yet to Do.
First Choice Graduate Programs Initiating a First Choice Program Consultation and Review.
The Academic Assessment Process
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
NASPAA Accreditation The Logic Model: Linking All Standards from Mission through Assessment.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching communications with mission: Standard 7.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2.
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as a process. InputsOutputs Outcomes Inputs  Classrooms  Syllabi  Library resources  PhD faculty  … Outputs 
NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.
Copyright c 2006 Oxford University Press 1 Chapter 7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions Problem solving is the communication that analyzes the problem.
Assessing a Campus-wide Internationalization Initiative: Aligning Assessments with Institutional Outcomes M. David Miller Timothy S. Brophy University.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
MBA Experience. Assessment of Learning Assessment of Experience Assessment of Market Conditions and Alumni/Employer Feedback MBA Experience.
Enhancing assessment capacity For teachers of Authority and Authority-registered subjects.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
LeMoyne-Owen College December 16, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
Quality Performance Dr. J. August 12, 2011 In-Service.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International): Process and Experiences Dr. James Simpson Dr. Yeqing Bao College of Business.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Developing a Comprehensive Learning Outcomes Assessment Strategy for Adult Learners Cindy MacMillan& Susan Davenport.
2007 Strengthening Student Success Conference, San Jose Dr. Jack Friedlander Executive Vice President, Educational Programs Santa Barbara City College.
. Reaffirmation 2014Off-site review is completedOn-site review is February 2014QEP is ready to be submitted in January 2014.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3.
Standard 5.1 CURRICULUM MAP John Glenn School of Public Affairs: Curriculum Map The Ohio State University as excerpted by the NASPAA Competencies Task.
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Teaching and Learning 1.
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
CAPSTONE PROJECTS:CONNECTING TO THE CORE COMPETENCIES OF MPA PROGRAMS ETHEL WILLIAMS, UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-OMAHA.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Design Process Overview. A design process is a systematic problem-solving strategy, with criteria and constraints, used to develop many possible solutions.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment toCCED Mohawk Valley Community College October 11, 2004.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Outcomes Assessment Committee
Accounting (Foundation)
Assessment of Student Learning
Masters in Public Administration
Standard IV Students.
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Cultural Competency & NASPAA Accreditation
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
Employer Engagement in Accreditation
Advanced Program Learning Assessment
Assessment and Accreditation
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Shazna Buksh, School of Social Sciences
SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1
Dan Kline, GenEd Director
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Presentation transcript:

NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies

Universal Required Competencies: the ability to 1.lead and manage in public governance 2.participate in and contribute to the policy process 3.analyze, synthesize, think critically, solve problems and make decisions 4.articulate and apply a public service perspective 5.communicate and interact productively with a diverse and changing workforce and citizenry

What can students who complete your degree do? “Our graduates will be creative city managers.” “Our graduates will be able to set goals, design programs, manage stakeholders, and obtain resources to improve municipal services.”

What can students who complete your degree do? “Our graduates will be stewards of the environment and architects of sustainability.” “Our graduates will be able to design environmental polices and programs that implement targets for sustainability.”

Program Competencies versus Course Competencies What can students do who complete a course on budgeting? “Students who complete the course will understand budgeting.” “Students who complete the course will be able to prepare a performance budget and accompanying justifications.”

Map your curriculum Recruit representatives from stakeholder groups Divide groups into task forces (TF) with cross- representation Charter TF’s to identify competencies and knowledge consistent with the degree program’s mission Each TF distributes competencies across the five domains Faculty/staff committee (FSC) refines task force outputs into coherent, measurable learning objectives FSC establishes measures to assess learning on each objective Faculty assign competencies and knowledge across required courses Draft matrix : domains in columns, competencies in rows, courses in cells Repeat periodically

A Full Assessment Cycle 1.Define the competency in terms of your program’s mission 2.Determine when and how you will measure that competency (select appropriate direct or indirect measures) 3.Collect the information (quantitative or qualitative) 4.Analyze and interpret the information to assess whether students have the intended competencies and to consider as part of overall program assessment

Measuring student learning

Sample Rubric Elements: Capstone Project ActivityExceedsMeetsFails Identifies salient issues Identifies salient issues, substantiates with conceptual and quantitative evidence Identifies salient issues Overlooks salient issues Identifies alternative solutions Identifies plausible, non-obvious, alternative solutions. Articulates plausible solutions. Fails to identify plausible solutions. Prepares recommendation s Recommends with reasoning and criteria for choice. Evaluates proposed actions. Recognizes tradeoffs and risks. Recommends with reasoning and criteria for choice. Evaluates proposed actions. Recommends without reasoning. No criteria for choice. More…

Sustainability  Plan to assess student learning  Cycle through all required competencies continuously over a reasonable period of time  Every cycle includes three processes: A.Defining the competency B.Measuring and analyzing performance C.Making evidence-based changes in the curriculum  Use the data for more than accreditation. Use it for internal improvements and for external bragging about the program.

Additional resources Powerpoints and Rubrics: accreditation.naspaa.org/resources If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to: accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions

Mission-driven Outcomes-oriented Evidence-based Accreditation-earning Program Management