NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

TRANSFORM TRUST & TEACHING SCHOOL ALLIANCE. PRIMARY-LED TRUST Vision Values and beliefs Governance and structure Membership Diocese and strategic partners.

Advertisements

ENTSOG’s view on next steps for regional co-operation Nigel Sisman Senior Adviser Stakeholder Group, GRI NW, Brussels, 26 Nov 2010.

Trainer Recognition and Accreditation. New Arrangements for Trainer Recognition and Accreditation  In August 2012, the GMC released a document ‘Recognising.

Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.

9 th Annual Public Health Finance Roundtable November 3, 2012 Boston, MA Peggy Honoré.

Home Visiting Overview April 8, Help Me Grow A program for Ohio’s expectant parents, newborns, infants and toddlers.

An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.

Faculty WASC Information Session January 18, 2011.

NASPAA Accreditation Serving on a Site Visit Team.

NASPAA Accreditation The Logic Model: Linking All Standards from Mission through Assessment.

NASPAA Accreditation Matching communications with mission: Standard 7.

NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.

NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as a process. InputsOutputs Outcomes Inputs  Classrooms  Syllabi  Library resources  PhD faculty  … Outputs 

NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as an outcome.

NASPAA Accreditation Why seek accreditation?. To improve the program Contributions to advancing knowledge and practice.

NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.

WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.

UCONN HCM System Implementation

Decision Making ACED 7030 Curriculum Issues in Adult and Career Education.

OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint

Professor Dolina Dowling

Assessment GroupDepth of analysis and clarity of issues (4) Contextuality Practicability, Novelty of recommendtns (4) Quality of Presentation (Consistancy.

The Faculty Leadership Role on Accreditation Julie Bruno, Sierra College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Chris Hill, Grossmont College Richard Mahon, Riverside.

Standard Four: Faculty Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland Michael Connolly, D.M.A. University of Portland.

Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator.

Reflection Questions Answer these questions about your SW-PBS team: 1.About what percent of your staff have bought into PBS? 2.What did or did not work.

October 2, 2010 Las Vegas NASPAA S ITE V ISITOR T RAINING.

Decision Making and Control chapter eleven McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Faculty Senate Orientation October 10, 2011 Faculty Senate.

Administrative Faculty Evaluation Workshop November 9, 2005.

Ms Rebecca Brown Deputy Director General, Department of Health

Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,

EDUCAUSE 2014 Top Ten IT Issues. Today’s Agenda Introduction to EDUCAUSE IT Issues History & Methodology 2014 Top Ten IT Issues Selected Issues Reviewed.

Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.

Accreditation in the higher education

NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3.

Faculty Supervision & Grading Responsibilities & Expectations.

Mainstreaming Job Evaluation Job Evaluation Group In partnership May 2006.

Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 9, :15 am Facilitator:

Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Resources Safety Division Please read this before using presentation  This presentation is based on content presented at the Industry Forum held in February.

Importance of Building Family and Community Engagement for Implementing a Multi-Tiered System of Support There is great power in harmony and mutual understanding.

Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.

CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT DR KEVIN LAWS FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND SOCIAL WORK THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY.

Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.

Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.

Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.

Restricted or Designated Funds in a Private Foundation.

Getting (and Maintaining) Your First Job.  Why is it important to demonstrate appropriate workplace behavior when applying for, maintaining, and leaving.

Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.

Welcome Surgery – Not just a PowerPoint Roles and Responsibilities – The New World.

The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.

Citizens or Elected Representatives Who Knows Best ?

Here Today Here to Stay August 17, TJC’s Mission.

Concerns of Noncommercial Users Constituency Privacy Conference November 29, 2005 Kathryn A. Kleiman, Esq. Internet Law and Policy Specialist, McLeod,

MGT 360 Week 2 Individual Shareholders and Stakeholders Presentation To purchase this material click on below link

PSY 355 Week 2 Learning Team Motivation Theories Presentation To purchase this material click on below link

HCS 335 Week 3 Learning Team Code of Ethics Paper To purchase this material click below link 3-Learning-Team-Code-of-Ethics-Paper.

ACC 455 Week 1 Individual Tax Return Position Paper To purchase this material click below link Individual-Tax-Return-Position-Paper.

Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013

Are you eligible? Are you ready?

BACKS Community Bank | Member FDIC Always Having Your Back in Banking!

The Office of Residential Child Care (ORCC) and Office of Provider Management (OPM) Standardization Project Presenters: LaMarva E. Ivory, ORCC Director.

10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences

10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences

The Role of the First Vice President of Programs

SACS Working Group Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement August 31, 2011.

SACS Working Group Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement October 6, 2011.

Presentation transcript:

NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2

Standard 2.1: Capacity  How do you deliver your program, and if you deliver it in different ways, how does the governance differ, if it does?  Who administers the program and what role and decision authority do they have for making decisions?  How does your governance arrangement support your mission?

Standard 2.2: Faculty Governance

The Primary Concern: Stability Maintain a core faculty—at least 5—consistent with the program’s mission Ensure coherent and consistent decision-making despite sabbaticals, leaves of absence, losses of and additions to the faculty

Additional Resources Powerpoints accreditation.naspaa.org/resources If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to : accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions

Mission-driven Outcomes-oriented Evidence-based Accreditation-earning Program Management