NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as an outcome.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

District Accreditation
Proposed Revised Mission of the Conformance Sig Current Mission Statement –The SIG Conformance will provide mechanisms for : 1. Specification of conformance.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
PSG Competencies to CS Competency Framework Map showing some of the principal areas of synergy CS Competencies PSG Competencies Leading and Communicating.
OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. Our Workplan Step One: Preparation May / June Start-up and planning meetings R&R; milestones; calendar; processes Training.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Division of Student Affairs Office of Research and Assessment The Accreditation Assessment Model August 20, 2008.
TPAS Accreditation Colin Cassie
Registration Update GT Training Day Bristol 20 November 2014 GT Training Day Bristol 20 November 2014.
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement March 22, 2012.
NASPAA Accreditation Serving on a Site Visit Team.
NASPAA Accreditation The Logic Model: Linking All Standards from Mission through Assessment.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching communications with mission: Standard 7.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2.
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as a process. InputsOutputs Outcomes Inputs  Classrooms  Syllabi  Library resources  PhD faculty  … Outputs 
NASPAA Accreditation Why seek accreditation?. To improve the program Contributions to advancing knowledge and practice.
NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Points & Rating System Recommendations May 2012 Prepared by Samuel A. Stephens Center for Assessment and Policy Development 1.
2 Management Governance The New Frontier 3 Shareholders & Stakeholders Board Management (through CEO) Delegation Reporting.
Roadmap to ISO Accreditation
SC21 Project Plan Overview. What is SC21? SC21: Is an industry change programme designed to accelerate the competitiveness of the aerospace, defence and.
Chartered Status…. What, Why and How Alexandra Sparvell National Industry Relationship Manager.
October 2, 2010 Las Vegas NASPAA S ITE V ISITOR T RAINING.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3.
District Accreditation Overview DAC and Parent Overview.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Grandview High School March 9-10, 2009.
Commendations The Quality Assurance Review Team commends Center Grove Central Middle School for: Strong collaborative leadership commitment is shown by.
Project Stakeholder Management
Student Learning Assessment and the Open Pathway Accreditation Process Presentation to IIT Faculty Spring 2013.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Sailing To District Accreditation External Review: October 6-9, 2013… but the journey begins now!
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
CREATING PARTIALLY ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. What’s important about how you learn?
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 Verification Overview What is Verification?  Independent, third-party review of reported emissions Why is it Important?  Ensures that an inventory.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT IN IMPROVING POPULATION HEALTH National Business Coalition on Health.
Improving Productivity Through Process Modernization Douglas A. Garver Executive Director.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
December 9, 2010 Laura A. Bayless, PhD Dean of Students St. Mary’s College of Maryland.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Genetic Technologist Registration and the AHCS
Assessment Strategies for Student Affairs
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Contents Playbook Objectives Playbook Value Details Playbook Design
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
AdvancED Accreditation
Are you eligible? Are you ready?
Focusing on Quality at UTT
Identifying & addressing its challenges and its role in Re-accreditation process Understanding the philosophy of continuous improvement review (CIR)
Hire Toyota Innova in Delhi for Outstation Tour
CQ WORKSHOPS 2 staff workshops on ‘Course Quality’ (June & Sept 2017)
Quality in Training Dr Mashbileg Maidrag
Please join us in celebrating. . .
Spaces for Building Postgraduate Communities
Defining Assessment 1  The State of Queensland (Department of Education and Training), 2009.
Session 6 2:30pm-4:00pm Site Visitor Training Facilitators:
Presentation transcript:

NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as an outcome

Who cares about your program?

Stakeholders  Whose support is required Why? In what form?  What information do they want to make decisions?  How do you engage them?

Launch  Who?  What?  Where?  When ?  Why?  How?

Change  Who was engaged in making changes?  What was the process?  Why did you do it?  How do the changes relate to the program’s mission?

Documentation and Evidence What documents and other evidence  confirm, and  inform your program’s decisions? And your stakeholder’s decision?

…assuring your stakeholders that the claims and promises you make are valid and demonstrable.

Additional resources Mapping your stakeholders : Source “A note on mapping” If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to : accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions

…is not only about voluntarily conforming to standards set by NASPAA for educational programs in public service. … is also about pursuing excellence in public service through education by executing well on a mission- based strategy. If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to: accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions