NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
1. The alignment with national plans. The four missions of higher education institutions. AU uniqueness and identities. AU academic excellence. SWOT analysis.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
 Introductions  Charge from President Blake  Timeline  Structure  Outcomes.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March
NASPAA Accreditation The Logic Model: Linking All Standards from Mission through Assessment.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching communications with mission: Standard 7.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2.
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as a process. InputsOutputs Outcomes Inputs  Classrooms  Syllabi  Library resources  PhD faculty  … Outputs 
NASPAA Accreditation Why seek accreditation?. To improve the program Contributions to advancing knowledge and practice.
Microsoft 2013 All Rights Reserved. Partners in Learning School Research Background.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OCTOBER 5, 2012 Enabling aspirations.
State of California Executive Leadership Competency Model January 12, 2011 Presentation for the California Citizens Redistricting Commission.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate AACTE, Atlanta, GA February 19, 2010.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
Guiding Principles We, the members of CPED, believe "The professional doctorate in education prepares educators for the application of appropriate and.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
Importance of Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing Education into Professional Nursing Practice American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Commission.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Developing Multisector Collaborations. Multisector collaboration Forming a partnership of: non-profit organizations private organizations public organizations,
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Giving Them our Best: 4-H Professional Development Logic Model Outcome: 4-H educators reflect quality, distinction and leadership in the field of youth.
Building Strong Library Associations | Library Associations in Society: An Overview DAY 1 Session 3 What is the context of Library Associations in your.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
AL Maaref University The Road Ahead FBA Student Induction Day Hussin Jose Hejase, PhD March 4, 2016.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Barleti School of Public Affairs. Public service in all countries of the Western Balkans (WB) faces many challenges and weaknesses in regards to public.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
ISER Committee Presentations
SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1
February 21-22, 2018.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Presentation transcript:

NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1

red flags This image identifies something likely to cause concern among members of COPRA, triggering closer inspection by the Commission and the site visit team.

A mission statement should  distinguish the program from others  describe who it wants to serve  describe what it values most in public service  focus on an outcome, what its graduates learn to do, rather than on an input, teaching  highlight what it wants to be particularly good at  offer insight into how the program will demonstrate success

How would you improve this mission statement? (#1) The program’s mission is to teach tomorrow’s leaders in public service, add to the body of knowledge about public administration and policy, and serve our community.

How would you improve this mission statement? (#2) The Master in Public Administration educates ethical leaders to work in local, state, and federal government. Through our cross- sectoral approach to learning, research, and service we help government leaders to connect domestic and global issues, alleviate poverty, and build responsive government. We promote compassion for marginalized communities and service to all people with accountability, justice, professionalism, sensitivity, and transparency.

How would you improve this mission statement? (#3) The MPA program prepares individuals for professional public, nonprofit, and healthcare sector careers. The program develops leaders and managers to promote trust and public value in the community. We educate by providing the key knowledge, skills and abilities our students require to serve in diverse public, nonprofit and healthcare settings. We work by conducting research and service activities supportive of these educational and instructional purposes which emphasize analytical thinking, problem solving and decision making and; We serve a diverse and ever-changing public, nonprofit and healthcare environment as a source of consultation with knowledge of public policy & public management issues to the community. Through these endeavors, we create value with the community, our community partners, students and University by bringing expertise to bear in real organizational settings. In carrying out each of these core activities, we seek to reflect and instill distinctive public service values of: Ethics, Equity, Responsiveness, Diversity, Cultural Competency, Efficiency and Transparency.

Standard 1.1: Mission  Explain your mission  Describe the process you used to establish your mission and how stakeholders were involved  Identify what public service values are most important

Standard 1.2: Performance expectations Expectations for Student Performance  Students will be able to identify ethical problems and recommend solutions  Students will be able to coordinate resources from business, government and nonprofits to address civic problems  Students will be able to design government programs that promote accountability Expectations for Faculty Performance  Faculty classroom activities will link global trends with domestic programs  Faculty research will seek to understand success in collaboration across sectors  Faculty community activities will include pro bono and consulting services for organizations striving to alleviate poverty

Standard 1.3: Assessing Performance InputActivityOutputOutcomeAssess Mission

Additional resources Powerpoints and examples of logic models: accreditation.naspaa.org/resources your-programs-performance-story.pdf Root cause analysis: Cf. J. Rooney and L. Vanden Heuvel, “Root cause analysis for beginners,” Quality Progress, July 2004 Balanced Scorecard 377/Default.aspx If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to : accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions

Mission-driven Outcomes-oriented Evidence-based Accreditation-earning Program Management