School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
Elementary and secondary education in Tennessee is governed by Federal law, Tennessee statutes, State Board of Education Rules and policies of local.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
School Innovation Fund (SIF) Grant Round 3: RFP: TA-15 Getting Started Conference Call July 16, 2014: 2:00 P.M. - 3:00 P.M.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Tennessee Promise Forward Mini- Grant Competition Tennessee Higher Education Commission Informational Webinar.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
District Planning in ePlan July Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Eve Carney Executive Director Renee Palakovic Director of Planning
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Expanding Opportunities Awards Technical Assistance Webinar 1.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
WELCOME!  The Mentoring Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Training Grant Program Capacity Building Grants
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
School Innovation Fund (SIF) Grant Round 2: RFP: TA-09 Awardees’ Orientation Part One: Conference Call January 7, 2013: 9:30 A.M. - 10:30 A.M.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Focus School Grant ApplicationFocus School Grant Application Consolidated Planning & MonitoringConsolidated Planning & Monitoring June 16, 2015June 16,
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
2014 Technical Assistance Funding Workshop 1/28/14.
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Priority & Focus School Title I, Part A, Set-Asides and Choice/Transfer Option Requirements Under ESEA Waiver District Coordinators/Administrators Priority.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
WELCOME!  The Physical Education Teacher Hire/ Professional Development Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Title I Section, 1003g Renewal Requirements March 2012.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Planning and Reporting Cohorts 2, 3, and 4 SIG Schools Rita Fentress, Director of School Improvement, Consolidated Planning.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
TTIPS Model Overview.
End of Year Report and Renewal Process
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
FC 335 Safe and Supportive Schools Competitive Grant Webinar
ApprenticeshipNC Regional Collaboration and Expansion Project
WELCOME! The Mentoring Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Presentation transcript:

School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Informational Webinar June 10, 2015

2 Webinar Agenda Background  Priority Schools  Options Overview of RFP Highlights of Recent SIG changes Funding Priority Levels Proposal Narratives  District-level and School-level Budget and Budget Guidance Scoring Submission and Timeline

3 Background - Priority Schools Priority schools are the lowest performing 5% of schools in the state, based on combined ELA/math performance, or significantly low graduation rates.  List of Priority Schools – Schools must implement a whole-school reform model that fully incorporates federal principles for school turnaround.  ESEA Waiver –

4 Background – Options for Priority Schools to meet the Whole-School Reform Requirement OptionsFundingFeatures SIG planCompetitive Implement 1 of 7 models Turnaround Restart Early Learning Innovation Framework Transformation Closure Evidence-based SURR or SCEP plan LEA-Funded Whole-school plan based on seven (7) USED turnaround principles ProgramsInitiatives.html

5 Background – Eligibility for SIG Cohort 6 Priority schools not currently receiving SIG funding are eligible to apply. Priority Schools that have previously received SIG or School Innovation Fund (SIF) funding are eligible to apply, but will receive a lower funding priority than schools that have never been funded. This RFP is not to be confused with the SIG/SIF Continuation Plan applications which were issued separately to currently- funded SIG (Cohorts 2-5) or SIF (SIF Cohort 3) schools. LEAs must be in compliance with Education Law 3012(c) regarding APPR throughout the entire grant period. NYSED will not be offering another round of the SIF grant.

6 Overview - School Improvement Grant RFP  The SIG application is designed to promote focused and sustainable school improvement.  District-level plan, school-level plan, requirements specific to the chosen model, and a budget and budget narrative  Five-year funding period includes three years of full implementation followed by the opportunity to apply for sustainability funding based on performance  Year 1 - Implementation Period is 10 months and begins September 1, 2015 and ends June 30, 2016.

7 Overview - School Improvement Grant RFP  There are now six federal models to choose from: Turnaround, Restart, Transformation, Closure, Early Learning, Evidence-based; and one state-determined model, the Innovation Framework.  The principal needs to be replaced in all models except for Restart and Closure. Refer to the Competencies for Determining School Leaders. oritySchoolLeaders.html. oritySchoolLeaders.html  Educational partner organizations (EPO) required for the Innovation Framework and an educational management organization (EMO) is required for the Restart model. See Restart model guidance regarding EMOs at and plementationrestartmodel052411_1.pdf. plementationrestartmodel052411_1.pdf

8 Overview - School Improvement Grant RFP  Maximum funding: $2,000,000 over 5 years, with suggested funding levels of $500,000 for each of the first three years, and the possibility of $250,000 for years 4 and 5  Federal Guidance: requirements-school-improvement-grants-title-i-of-the-elementary-and- secondary-education-act requirements-school-improvement-grants-title-i-of-the-elementary-and- secondary-education-act  The state-determined model is the Innovation Framework, which includes the following pathways:  College Pathways School Design,  Community-Oriented School Design, and  Career and Technical Education School Design. The specific requirements of these pathways are found in the RFP.

Highlights - Recent SIG Changes Three new models – Early Learning model, Evidence-based model, and the Innovation Framework which is the NYS Education Department’s state-determined model Link to the Early Learning model and the Evidence-based model information The grant is now a 5-year grant – 3 full years of implementation, and schools will be eligible for up to two additional years of sustainability funding. Awards are still prioritized by whether or not a school was previously funded, but now are also prioritized by model selected. 9

Highlights - Recent SIG Changes The “Rule of 9” is no longer in effect; however, applications proposing the Transformation model are in funding priority level two. More information is explained later. Previous SIG cohorts – Cohort 1 schools that are still in priority status are now re-eligible for an additional 5 years of funding, but will be a lower funding priority level. Cohorts 2-5, are also now eligible for up to 5 years of continuous funding, but will follow a Continuation Application process separate from this RFP. 10

Funding Priority 1- Turnaround, Restart, Innovation Framework, and Early Learning Intervention models from eligible Priority Schools that have never before been funded by SIG 1003(g) or SIF grants. Funding Priority 2 - All applications for Priority Schools reviewed for the Transformation model that have never before been funded by SIG1003(g) or SIF grants. Funding Priority 3 - All applicants for Priority Schools reviewed for the Closure model that have never before been funded by SIG 1003(g) or SIF grants. 11 Funding Priority Levels

Funding Priority 4 –  All Priority school applications for Turnaround, Restart, Transformation, Innovation Framework, Closure, and Early Learning Intervention models from eligible Priority Schools that have previously received 1003[g] SIG or SIF funds.  All Priority School applications reviewed for the Evidence- based model.  All Focus school applications. Federal guidelines state, “SIG funds may be used to fund Focus Schools only after the SEA has already funded all of its Priority Schools with approvable SIG applications.”

13 Proposal Narratives General Points of Emphasis for Proposal Development  Include specificity and information-rich descriptions.  Provide clear evidence of capacity to implement: Board policies and/or procedures, Contractual provisions, and Clearly articulated labor-management agreements.  Provide clear evidence of school and community input in the plan.  Fulfill all federal requirements of the chosen model within the district-level and school-level plans.

14 Proposal Narratives District-level Plan (20 points)  District Overview  Operational Autonomies  District Accountability and Support  Teacher and Leader Pipeline  External Partner Recruitment, Screening and Matching  Enrollment and Retention Policies, Practices and Strategies  District-level Labor-Management Collaboration

15 Proposal Narratives School-level Plan (60 points)  School Overview  Needs Assessment  School Model/Framework Selection  Leadership  Instructional Staff  Partnerships  Organizational Plan  Educational Plan  Training, Support, and PD  Stakeholder Involvement and Communication  Project Plan and Timeline

16 Budget and Budget Guidance (20 points) Budget Narrative :  Clear explanation/justification of costs  Specific identification of all funding sources  Strategies for sustainability Budget Forms :  Year-One Implementation Period FS-10  Budget Summary Chart

17 Additional Budget Guidance Budgeted items must be closely connected to organizational and pedagogical needs and purposes identified in the plan. A maximum of 10% per budget may be allocated for supplies and materials (e.g., technology, office supplies, etc.). Proposed expenses for supplies and materials must be reasonable and necessary and must not exceed 10% of the total funding request. District costs must be associated with administration and support, and may not exceed 10% of the total funding request. The budget request must be commensurate to school size and need.

18 Scoring Scoring of application based on 100 possible points  District-level plan (20 points)  School-level plan (60 points)  Budget and narrative (20 points) 65-point threshold for award consideration Scoring rubric Required elements  Refer to Submission Checklist.  Applications must include ALL required elements.

19 Submission and Timeline The SIG RFP can be found at: SIG Application Questions  Must be received by 5:00 p.m. on June 24, 2015  Send to: Letters of Intent are requested, and should be submitted through Review Room by 3:00 p.m. on June 24, Questions and Answers posted  Posted by July 8, 2015 at

20 Submission and Timeline Complete applications must be successfully uploaded through Review Room by 3:00 p.m. on July 22, 2015 at Please also mail a complete application with a cover page with an original signature, plus one complete copy to the address listed on page 4 of the RFP. This must be postmarked by July 22, Award/non-award notification letters will be sent to districts in August, M/WBE requirements

21

22 Submission and Timeline Review Room Questions  Technical assistance for electronic submission only  Tracy Farrell at

23 School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 6 Thank You NYSED School Turnaround Office