Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness in [DISTRICT NAME/ BUILDING NAME] Date/Presenter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Procedural Safeguards
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
What is an Ombudsman (OM-budz-man)? A person who assists individuals resolve conflicts or concerns. Works in a variety of organizations, such as government.
Mentoring and Beginning Teacher Induction Program Karen Linville, WV Center for Professional Development Nathan Estel, West Virginia Department of Education.
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November
Teacher Evaluation Model
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Teacher Evaluation Update Marzano Protocol System.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Principals and Assistant Principals.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2014 Overview of Final Evaluation Report Administrator.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
Assisting Students with Disabilities: A Training Program
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
University of Hull Mentors’ Meetings March PGCE Final Placement Induction: Week beginning 23 rd March. Block placement completes Thursday25 th June.
Human Resources and School Finance
FASPA Conference October, 2010 Implementing a Salary Differential Program.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers August 2015.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Martha Van Leeuwen University of Kansas Resources for Paraeducators Website The Laws for Paraeducators.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN THE EDUCATIONAL SETTING What is it expected to accomplish? The organizational context explained Purpose Develop a model of the.
Martha Thurlow Laurene Christensen Courtney Foster April 22, :15-2:15 MONITORING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
Mentoring and Induction of New Teachers (MINT) CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS CPS Teachers Academy for Professional Development Diane H. Zendejas, Director The.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Cheryl Simonson, CESA 6 Jacob Hollnagel, DPI. Guiding Successful Implementation of Educator Effectiveness Understand successful educator effectiveness.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS IN WISCONSIN: FEEDBACK FROM RURAL SCHOOLS 1.
CPD- Continuous Professional Development & GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL STAFF.
Update on the MA Task Force on Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Associate Commissioner.
Chapter 14 Providing for Personal and Professional Staff Development ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Educator Effectiveness from A to Z in a Small District.
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Beginning Educator Support Team NEWESD 101 Consortium
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Strategic Planning Goals
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM
EDA 560 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
Lesson 6: Evaluating Performance
Five Required Elements
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Teacher Evaluation Process
Implementing Race to the Top
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Curriculum Selection Process
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness in [DISTRICT NAME/ BUILDING NAME] Date/Presenter

The Educator Effectiveness (EE) System is… Designed to support the continuous improvement of educator practice that leads to improved student learning Built BY and FOR Wisconsin educators An objective, performance-based evaluation for teachers and principals A tool to provide meaningful feedback for professional growth

EE is NOT… A “gotcha” or “one size fits all” mandate A result of Act 10 Designed to compare or rank educators A rash or impulsive reform [or other common fear in district/school]

Who will participate in the EE System? [Describe locally included educators] [Share the DPI Flowchart to identify mandated educators]DPI Flowchart [Explain how administrators decided who will be in a Summary Year this year] [Describe any impact on non-EE System staff]

Who can be an EE evaluator? Evaluators are active administrators AND Complete training [Describe evaluator training (including Teachscape Focus certification)] Typical Evaluator Roles[Explain application in district/school]: – Superintendents evaluate principals – Principals evaluate assistant principals and teachers Assistant principals evaluate teachers – Principals/other administrators with additional training MAY evaluate other principals

Who will evaluate me? Lead evaluators [Identify specific names or roles, (i.e., “building principals”, Director of Instruction, etc.) and any other evaluators who may contribute to an educator’s Summary Year scores and Summary Graph, if applicable] Other administrators [Explain (if relevant) which administrators in the district other than the superintendent will evaluate other administrators] Other evaluators [Explain (if relevant) any special circumstances such as the use of evaluators from other districts, retired educators, CESA personnel, etc.)]

When will I participate in EE? Effectiveness Cycle [explain Effectiveness Cycle in district/school, Summary versus Supporting Years, expectations] Observations [explain number/type of observations]

What EE training will I receive? [Explain local training procedures] – Step 3 Training (evaluators) – Step 4 (all) [Dates of scheduled in-service days, training opportunities] [Additional local training information/resources]

Who will support me over the Effectiveness Cycle? Explain local supports [Effectiveness coaches, CESA contacts/Implementation Coaches/PLCs, mentors] [Contact person/people for Teachscape, evaluation management, or resource questions]

Is my EE Data private? Wisconsin law prevents districts from releasing EE data in response to an Open Records request. Wis. Stat.§ (2m). [Explain district policy for protection or viewing of EE Data] [Include any penalties/consequence for a breach of policy by a district employee or board member]

Will I get a final EE Score? No, EE represents educator results on a Summary Graph Coordinate Pair [Show Practices Summary and Student Outcomes Summary and explain Summary Graphic]Practices Summary Student Outcomes Summary Summary Graphic Training [Reminder that Steps 1, 2 and 4 training for educators will explain the EE System in detail, including scoring components, screencasts of how to use Teachscape, and the Summary Graph]

How will [school/district] use EE Data? [Specify the role of EE System data in the overall district supervision and evaluation process] [Explain the relationship between EE System elements and related components of the district’s supervision and evaluation process, for example:] – new educator mentoring and induction support – criteria for moving an educator into an improvement plan – grounds for non-renewal or dismissal – impact on local compensation and advancement systems

What about conflict resolution in the EE System? [Explain conflict resolution process including reconciling differences of opinion between an evaluator and educator regarding (for example)]: – scoring – request from an educator or district for an early or additional Summary Year – request from an educator for re-evaluation – appeals to the final scoring decision, etc.

How can I get more information about EE? Visit the EE Website: For the latest EE updates and resources, follow the EE Twitter feed: and Pinterest board: EE Twitter feed [Identify local district dedicated page/contact person and other local resources]