Understanding Quick Scores & This Year’s ChangeUnderstanding Quick Scores & This Year’s Change Dr. Nakia TownsDr. Nakia Towns Assistant Commissioner for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Gateway and End of Course 2007.
Advertisements

Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Department for Assessment/Accountability, DeKalb County School System.
Bureau of Indian Education
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Components of the 2015 Texas Assessment Program State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) –STAAR Spanish –STAAR A –STAAR L –STAAR Alternate.
END OF COURSE STAAR TESTING What every 9 th grade student and parent need to know Sept
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Legislative Update #1 Changes in Assessment and Graduation 83 rd Texas Legislature.
Assessment Implications of HB 5 William Kelly Coordinator of Assessment and Evaluation.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Spring Assessment Update Grades 3 to 8.
THE NEW FSA Florida Standards Assessment Dr. Karen Schafer Brevard Public Schools July, 2014.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
2014 SOAR Update AAEA Fall Conference presented by Ivy Pfeffer, Assistant Commissioner Arkansas Department of Education October 29, 2014.
Vertical Scale Scores.
Information provided by LISD Assessment Office.  STAAR stands for: › State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness  Implemented in for school year.
Accessing Assessment Data  Marcy Tidwell Associate Director, Assessment Literacy.
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
TNReady Questions Compared to Previous TCAP Questions TNReady will test a deeper level of student knowledge than previous TCAP tests in math.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Assessment Update 2008 GACIS Fall Conference. Transition of Assessments to the GPS Two major tasks: 1.Content alignment “What students must know” Make.
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
Using Data to Make Decisions Regarding Professional and Personalized Learning: WV General Summative Assessment – Part 1 County Chief Instructional Leadership.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
TESTING TIMES Is a daily publication. Contains step by step directions and reminders for the day. Delivered daily via to principals, assistant principals,
Fall 2007 MEAP Reporting 2007 OEAA Conference Jim Griffiths – Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting Sue Peterman - Department Analyst, MEAP.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
ISAT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. Why is OSBE making so many changes to the ISAT? The contract between NWEA & OSBE was due to expire. Even if the contractor.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
DAC Legislative Update September 2010 Sharon Koon Policy Coordinator Office of Assessment Senate Bill 4 & House Bill 105.
2015 State PARCC Results A webinar for school and district leaders Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator Wally McKenzie Edwin Analytics.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
Ohio’s State Assessments: What do families need to know? November 2015.
Accessing Assessment Data  Marcy Tidwell Associate Director, Assessment Literacy.
TNReady for Educators. TNReady is the New & Improved TCAP TNReady is the new and improved TCAP test in math and English language arts (ELA) for grades.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Overview of the Model to Measure Student Learning Growth on FCAT as developed by the Student Growth Implementation Committee Juan Copa, Director of Research.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
ESSENTIAL SKILLS ACHIEVEMENT STANDARD ON SMARTER BALANCED Cristen McLean Policy Analyst Derek Brown Director of Assessment.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness January 2012.
Accountability Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services August 15, 2014.
Tennessee Tech University Teacher Appreciation Thursday, April 28, 2016 Dr. Candice McQueen, Commissioner of Education.
Brentwood Rotary Club Wednesday, March 30, 2016 Dr. Candice McQueen, Commissioner of Education.
To support efforts to raise student achievement To support the district’s accountability status To offer standardized accountability metrics to complement.
November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics Mississippi.
Policy & Legislation Elizabeth Fiveash, Assistant Commissioner, Policy & Legislative Affairs.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Weslaco East High School
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update
Release of PARCC Student Results
California Educational Research Association
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
How to Interpret Student Growth Plots
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Quick Scores & This Year’s ChangeUnderstanding Quick Scores & This Year’s Change Dr. Nakia TownsDr. Nakia Towns Assistant Commissioner for Data and ResearchAssistant Commissioner for Data and Research June 1, 2015June 1, 2015

Essential Questions  What is a quick score?  What changed about calculating quick scores this year in grades 3-8 and why?  What is the impact of the change in methodology for calculating quick scores this year in grades 3-8?  How is the department communicating directly and how is it supporting districts to communicate with parents and teachers regarding the change in quick score methodology?  What is the plan regarding quick scores for , with the transition to TNReady, and beyond? 2

Key Terms  Raw Score: the number of questions a student answered correctly.  Scale Score: generated from the raw score; this allows a comparison of student performance from year to year. Because the questions on the test change each year, scale scores give us a metric to compare apples to apples.  Cut Score: generated from the scale score; determines a student’s performance level (i.e., below basic, basic, proficient, advanced).  Quick Score: generated from the raw score; only to be factored into a student’s end of year grade, as required by law. This score is on a 100-point scale because student grades are on a 100-point scale.  Performance Levels: generated from the scale score to represent student’s level of proficiency. Performance levels are categorized as below basic, basic, proficient, or advanced. 3

TCAP Scoring Flow Chart 4

What is a Quick Score? 3 rd Grade RLA – What is proficient?  Though 72 percent correct means a student is proficient, this would be a low pass to failing grade on most A-F grading scales for 3-8.  Quick scores convert the number of questions students answered correctly (raw score) on TCAP into a measure on a 100-point grading scale as typically used by teachers.  A quick score is not the percent correct on TCAP.  A quick score is not a percentile rank. 72% correct 760 Scale Score 43 Raw Score 43 correct answers out of 60 questions Quick Score? 5

Quick Score Methodology Cube Root Scale In grades 9-12, the state has a uniform grading policy. The quick score calculation for EOCs has used the cube root scaling method since

Quick Score Methodology Interval Scale Grades 3-8 used the interval scaling method to calculate quick scores prior to this year, This method fixed quick scores to TCAP performance levels for grades and subject. (1) Number Correct = 0, then Numeric Score (or Quick Score)=0, (2) If Raw Score Basic Cut = 29 (2011 RLA, Grade=5), then 70 (Quick Score), (3) If Raw Score Proficient Cut = 48 (2011 RLA, Grade=5), then 85 (Quick Score), 7

Quick Scores  This past fall, prior to leadership transition, the office of assessment logistics made the decision to stop including TCAP performance levels with quick scores.  The department also decided to use the cube root scaling method for both high school EOCs and 3-8 Achievement.  These changes were made to streamline the calculations, providing a consistent methodology in high school EOCs and 3-8 Achievement.  It’s important to note, the interval scaling method cannot be used during assessment transitions before teachers complete standards setting to determine scale score cuts.  As the cube root methodology was used for EOCs in prior years, there was no change this year for students, teachers, and parents in grades

Quick Scores  The change in quick score methodology for grades 3-8 was not adequately or widely communicated in fall 2014, resulting in confusion for students, teachers, and parents in grades 3-8 with regard to interpreting quick scores.  Though no performance levels were published with quick scores, many relied on the prior interval scaling method and believed that a quick score of 85 was equivalent to proficient.  Possibly, some teachers may have communicated to parents that students were proficient who may not have been.  Possibly, some schools may have prematurely estimated their TCAP proficiency rates in advance of official accountability releases in June and July. 9

Quick Score Methodology Implications  The bar for proficiency has not changed. Scale score cut points are the same in 2015 as they were in  The quick score methodology does not impact TCAP performance levels.  The reality of student performance with regard to scale score cuts does not depend on the quick score. 10

Quick Score Methodology Implications How do quick scores impact teachers?  Quick scores do not impact evaluation or TVAAS, and quick scores have no bearing on personnel decisions tied to performance.  Quick scores have no impact on teacher, school, or district accountability metrics. How do quick scores impact students?  For grades 3-8, there is no statewide uniform grading policy. This means that a quick score of 84 in one district may be considered a B, while in another district it may be considered a C.  For grades 9-12, there is a statewide uniform grading policy, so that the quick score range for an A is consistent in all districts.  Quick scores count for 15-25% of the student’s semester grade or 7.5% to 12.5% of the end of year grade in

Additional Information and Support  Monday, May 18 – Quick scores using cube root scaling methodology released to districts for grades 3-8.  Tuesday, May 19 – Commissioner learns of fall 2014 decision to change 3-8 quick score calculation and determines this change has not been previously communicated.  Wednesday, May 20 – Commissioner s directors indicating quick score methodology change and timeline for additional information. Also included in Director Update.  Friday, May 22 – Detailed information released to districts regarding the quick score methodology for grades 3-8 achievement and high school EOCs, as well as tables showing quick score that is equivalent to scale score proficiency cuts.  Wednesday, May 27 – Conference call with directors and district data and accountability personnel to answer questions. May 22 and conference call information included in Director Update.  Thursday, May 28 – ed detailed quick score information to Tennessee Education Association, which was posted to TEA website. 12

Additional Information and Support  Thursday, May 28 – Released raw scores for spring 2015 achievement 3-8 and high school EOCs to all districts. Second conference call with district data and accountability personnel.  Friday, May 29 – Launched Understanding Quick Scores website.  Friday, May 29 – Released Educator Update and Principal Update with message from Commissioner and additional quick score information.  Friday, May 29 – Released Classroom Chronicles blog post from Commissioner with apology for department communication failure and additional quick score information for all educators.  Saturday, May 30 – Released raw scores and corresponding quick score using interval scaling methodology for spring 2015 achievement 3-8.  June 1-15 – Regional face-to-face meetings scheduled in East, Central and West Tennessee to answer additional questions for district personnel regarding quick scores and TCAP.  June 1-15 – Additional meetings with various stakeholder groups. 13

Quick Scores in and Beyond  New TNReady assessments for math and English language arts, as well as new social studies and US History assessment will be introduced next year.  Teachers will not complete standards setting to define scale scores cuts for any of these subjects until summer  Though quick scores can be calculated in advanced of standards setting, the department will seek additional stakeholder feedback to determine what is most appropriate.  Over the next few months, the department will engage TOSS (superintendents) Working Group in discussion about quick scores for 3-8 achievement and high school EOCs for  In August 2015, the department will communicate initial decision regarding quick scores and follow-up in September with more details during regional assessment meetings, as well via department updates and on public websites. 14

Resources  Learn more about Understanding Quick Scores:  Learn more about TNReady:  Preview questions for TNReady via MICA Item Sampler: All teachers have logins – Commissioner on 5/19. Contact district testing coordinator or Public access via “About” menu.  Learn more about all TCAP Assessments: QUESTIONS? 15