Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Advertisements

Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study Study
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
ALLY-2  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, in treatment-naïve genotype 1 treated for 12 weeks DCV + SOF 400 mg QD DCV + SOF.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
NIAID ERADICATE Open-label W12 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve HIV infection on stable ART ≥ 8 weeks and HIV RNA < 50 c/ml.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 106 W12 > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1-6 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen Compensated cirrhosis allowed*
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
eGFR (MDRD) > 50 mL/min
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com C-CREST study, Part B: uprifosbuvir (MK-3682)/GZR/ruzasvir (MK-8408) fixed-dose combination + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 - Phase II Randomisation.
AL study: AL ODV + SMV in naïve patients, phase II
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
QUARTZ II-III : OBV/PTV/r + SOF RBV in genotype 2 or 3
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
No HBV or HIV co-infection
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI – Phase 2
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
SOF/VEL ± RBV in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Sequencing cohorts Open-label Design W8 W12 ≥ 18 years
Presentation transcript:

Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS-955176 (maturation inhibitor) - AI468002 Study

AI468002 Study: BMS-955176 Phase II Design Phase IIa, randomised, double-blind, dose-escalating study ARV-naïve (≤ 1 week of treatment) or experienced (PI and maturation inhibitor naïve) patients, > 18 years, HIV RNA > 5,000 c/mL, CD4 cell count > 200/mm3 For all dose groups : 8 patients on BMS-176 qd and 2 on placebo HIV RNA evaluated at Day 1 to 14, Day 17-19 and Day 24 BMS-176 5 mg qd or placebo BMS-176 10 mg qd or placebo BMS-176 20 mg qd or placebo BMS-176 40 mg qd or placebo BMS-176 80 mg qd or placebo BMS-176 120 mg qd or placebo AI468002 Study Hwang C. CROI 2015, Abs. 114LB

Baseline characteristics AI468002 Study: BMS-955176 Phase II Baseline characteristics Placebo N = 12 BMS-176 5 mg N = 8 10 mg 20 mg 40 mg 80 mg 120 mg Median age, years 36 43.5 39 33 38 31.5 37.5 Female 12.5% HIV RNA (log10 c/mL), median 4.0 4.1 3.6 3.8 CD4 cell count/mm3, median 458 437 539 512 536 504 498 ARV-naïve : 92% ; ARV-experienced : 8% AI468002 Study Hwang C. CROI 2015, Abs. 114LB

Maximum median reduction in HIV RNA from baseline, log10 c/mL AI468002 Study: BMS-955176 Phase II Maximum median reduction in HIV RNA from baseline, log10 c/mL Placebo N = 12 5 mg qd N = 8 10 mg qd 20 mg qd 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 40 mg qd 80 mg qd 120 mg qd -1.2 -1.4 -1.6 -1.8 -1.0 - 0.381 - 0.498 - 0.976 - 1.115 - 1.555 - 1.654 - 1.701 Median change in HIV RNA from baseline to day 11 was – 1.4 log10 c/mL BMS-955176 exposure-response relationship is consistent with dose-response antiviral activity AI468002 Study Hwang C. CROI 2015, Abs. 114LB

AI468002 Study: BMS-955176 Phase II Maximum median reduction in HIV RNA, log10 c/mL by baseline Gag polymorphisms Placebo N = 12 5 mg qd N = 8 10 mg qd 20 mg qd 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 40 mg qd 80 mg qd 120 mg qd -1.2 -1.4 -1.6 -1.8 -1.0 -0.55 -0.48 -1.05 - 1.66 - 1.55 - 1.57 - 1.75 -0.33 -0.52 -0.97 - 0.93 - 1.43 - 1.98 - 1.71 6 5 3 4 2 -2.0 No polymorphisms With polymorphisms (V362, Q369, V370) AI468002 Study Hwang C. CROI 2015, Abs. 114LB

AI468002 Study: BMS-955176 Phase II Adverse events Placebo N = 12 5 mg N = 8 10 mg 20 mg 40 mg 80 mg 120 mg Discontinuation due to adverse event Serious AEs Grade 3-4 related AEs Death Laboratory abnormalities (Grade 2-4) 1* * Transient grade 3 neutropenia reported as related to study drug AI468002 Study Hwang C. CROI 2015, Abs. 114LB

AI468002 Study: BMS-955176 Phase II Conclusion BMS-955176 is a potent, once-daily, second-generation maturation inhibitor with a maximum median decrease of 1.7 log10 copies/mL in plasma HIV RNA with 10 days of monotherapy at the 40 mg dose Doses of 20-120 mg qd resulted in decreases > 1 log10 c/mL Plateau of ≈ - 1.6 log10 c/ml at 40-120 mg qd Similar antiviral activity against both wild-type HIV-1 and HIV-1 with Gag polymorphisms not responsive to a first-generation maturation inhibitor Well tolerated No serious adverse events, No adverse events leading to discontinuation, No grade 3-4 adverse events, No significant laboratory abnormalities AI468002 Study Hwang C. CROI 2015, Abs. 114LB