Measuring δ CP at the second ν oscillation maximum 1 1477 Win2015 Conference in Heidelberg 12 June 2015 Tord Ekelof, Uppsala University 1 ESSνSB 2015-06-12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Advertisements

Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
New Large* Neutrino Detectors
Accelerator based Neutrino program around the world 1. Europe: Neutrino platform at CERN ESS second maximum? 2. Japan: T2K and HyperK status 3. USA: LBNF.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
PLAN Morning Talk – Long Base Line Neutrino Oscillations – 1) Beam line & brief description of detector 2) Neutrino interaction signal Afternoon talk –
Alain Blondel Detectors UNO (400kton Water Cherenkov) Liquid Ar TPC (~100kton)
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
February 19, 2001Neutrino Beams from BNL to Homestake Stephen Kahn Page 1 A Super-Neutrino Beam From BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn
K. Nakamura NNN05, Aussois, April Overview of Hyper-Kamiokande R&D Kenzo NAKAMURA KEK April 7-9, 2005 NNN05 Aussois, Savoie, France.
The meeting in Paris: The agenda has been built and optimized.
Modifications on ESS for neutrino Super Beam
Future Accelerator Based Neutrino Experiments Takashi Kobayashi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
ESSnuSB Project for Leptonic CP Violation Discovery based on the European Spallation Source Linac NOW 2014, 10/9E. Wildner, CERN 2 Elena WILDNER CERN for.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 20 August 2013M. Dracos.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Alain Blondel. AIDA-Neutrino meeting AIDA Neutrino detector studies 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA 3. Discuss.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
A new underground laboratory at Frejus Jacques Bouchez CEA-SACLAY NNN05-Aussois April 7, 2005 Historical overview Latest developments Outlook.
STATUS OF BNL SUPER NEUTRINO BEAM PRORAM W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NBI2003, KEK November 7-11, 2003.
Neutrino Oscillations at Homestake from Chlorine to the Megadetector Ancient Origins of the Question ~1860 Darwin publishes “On The Origin of Species”-
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 10 September 2013M. Dracos.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
Optimizing the green-field beta beam NuFact 08 Valencia, Spain June 30-July 5, 2008 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
A lepton CP violation experiment using a neutrino Super Beam from ESS and a megaton water Cherenkov detector Tord Ekelöf Swedish HEP Strategy.
A monochromatic neutrino beam for  13 and  J. Bernabeu U. de Valencia and IFIC NO-VE III International Workshop on: "NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS IN VENICE"
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
ESS Linac WP8 Radio Frequency Systems and Test Facilities ESS/SPL Collaboration Meeting Lund, 29 June 2010 Roger Ruber (Uppsala University) for the ESS.
Jacques Bouchez Radioactive Beams for Nuclear and Neutrino Physics Les Arcs Mars 2003.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Optimization of a neutrino factory for large  13 Golden 07 IFIC, Valencia June 28, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 EUROnu Introduction and Objectives Neutrino oscillations: much interest since 1 st paper in extension required to.
An ESS Based Super Beam for Lepton CP violation discovery arXiv: v2 [hep-ex] 14 Oct 2013 Tord Ekelof, Uppsala Univerisity of behalf of the ESSνSB.
ICARUS-LBNE project A. Guglielmi 1.LBNE-ICARUS Padova meeting 2.SPS-C C. Rubbia presentation.
ESSνSB – Far Detector and Underground Site nd ESSnuSB Meeting in Lund Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University Tord Ekelöf, Uppsala Univerisity.
Progress on Swedish sites Garpenberg Mine LAGUNA-LBNO Meeeting Paris Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University The Garpenberg Castle built 1801.
Hyper-K Collaboration Meeting at QMU London 10 July 2016 Tord Ekelof, Uppsala University 1 ESSnu interests Hyper-K Collaboration Meeting.
The ESSνSB project th Open Hyper-K Project Meeting Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University The European Spallation Source ν Super Beam project.
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
ESSνSB: The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery
n Physics at ESS and the upgrades needed for the ESSnuSB
IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg
ESSνSB 1477 Measuring leptonic CP violation at the second ν oscillation maximum ENUBET Meeting in Padova 23June 2016 Tord Ekelof, Uppsala University
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
ESS Super Beam for neutrino CP violation discovery
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
The ESS Neutrino Super Beam and associated large Cherenkov Detector Design Study Lund 2014 M. Dracos.
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
XVth International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Betabeams and Superbeams LAGUNA-LBNO Many thanks to D. Duchesneau, F. Di Lodovico, T. Patzak, A. Rubbia.
The European Consortium working on the ESSνSB project
ESSnuSB presentation at NNN2013 Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University
Poster session: Wednesday 6 June
The status and performance of ESSnuSB
Roger Ruber for the FREIA team 11 June 2013, Uppsala
Presentation transcript:

Measuring δ CP at the second ν oscillation maximum Win2015 Conference in Heidelberg 12 June 2015 Tord Ekelof, Uppsala University 1 ESSνSB WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

ESS construction site 10 April WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University *

ESS proton linac The ESS will be a copious source of spallation neutrons 5 MW average beam power 125 MW peak power 14 Hz repetition rate (2.86 ms long pulses each of protons) 2.0 GeV protons (up to 3.5 GeV with linac upgrades) >2.7x10 23 p.o.t/year Linac ready by 2023 (full power and energy ) 3 HEBT & upgrade: 2.5 GeV+68 m, 3.0 GeV +60 m, 3.5 GeV +66 m, WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

4 The first accelerating cavity prototypes have been designed and fabricated and are being tested this and next year. Series production will start in 2017 Double spoke cavity Fivefold elliptical cavity 352 MHz 704 MHz Has been low power tested at IPN Orsay and will be high power tested in FREIA Lab in Uppsala in The first unit will arrive in Uppsala next week. Has been low power tested at CEA Saclay and will be high power tested in Lund in 2016 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

ESS LINAC PROJECT SCHEDULE 5 5 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

How to add a neutrino facility to ESS? Increase the linac average power from 5 MW to 10 MW by increasing the linac pulse rate from 14 Hz to 28 Hz, implying that the linac duty cycle increases from 4% to 8%. Inject into an accumulator ring circumference ca 400 m) to compress the 3 ms proton pulse length to 1.5 μs, which is required by the operation of the neutrino horn (fed with 350 kA current pulses). The injection in the ring requires H - pulses to be accelerated in the linac. Add a neutrino target station (studied in EUROν) Build near and far neutrino detectors (studied in LAGUNA) 6 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

On the higher sensitivity to δ CP at the second oscillation maximum 7 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Optimization of facilities for large Θ 13 P. Coloma and E. F. Martinez First oscillation maximum at L/E= 500Km/GeV and the second maximum at L/E=1500 km/ GeV Signal systematics and not statistics is the bottleneck for large Θ 13, explore second maximum WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 8 Θ 13 =1ºΘ 13 =8.5º

9 The ESSnuSB electron neutrino energy distribution from the ESS 2 GeV proton beam at the first and second maximum for Θ 13 =8.5º and different δ CP values Statistical errors somewhat larger than the 7% systematic errors Better discrimination between the different δ CP values WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University Statistical errors smaller than the 7% systematic errors Limited discrimination between different δ CP values due to systematic errors First maximumSecond maximum

10 Θ 13 =8.73 o 1 st osc. max 2 nd osc. max 3 rd osc. max After the spring 2012, when Θ 13 had been measured and ESSnuSB was designed, CP violation discovery probability is considerably larger at the second oscillation maximum as compered to the first Znkgruvan Garpenberg 10 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

11 Θ 13 =4 o 1 st osc. max 2 nd osc. max 3 rd osc. max Reminder of the situation before 2012 at which time LBNE, Hyper-K and LBNO were designed – the optimum for CP violation discovery was clearly at the first maximum 11 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 3σ--- 5σ

WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 12 LBNE The sensitivity of the neutrino energy distribution to δ CP Hyper-K first maximum LBNE first maximum ESSnuSB second maximum Relative difference in counts at maximum between δ CP = 3π/2 and π/2 : 510/340 = /65 = /22 = 4.8 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University δ CP Red=π/2 Green= π Blue=3 π/2 Events/50MeV Hyper-K LBNE/DUNE Events/100MeV

13 ESSnuSB a energy distribution shape measuring experiment Systematic normalization errors suppressed Only very modest discrimination between the different δ CP values WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University M. Olvegård Second maximum

14 ESSnuSB as counting experiment WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University First maximum Second maximum Statistical errors much smaller than the 7% systematic errors Limited discrimination between different δ CP values due to systematic errors Statistical errors about equal to than the 7% systematic errors Even better discrimination between the different δ CP values M. Olvegård

15 ESSnuSB as neutrino/antineutrino ratio counting expt Syst. and stat. errors balanced Range of variation >-0.6 Excellent discrimination between the different δ CP values WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University M. Olvegård Syst. and stat. errors not balanced Range of variation +.06->-0.05 Limited discrimination between the different δ CP values First maximum Second maximum

From Stephen Parke/ FNAL; “Neutrinos: Theory and Phenomenology” arXiv: v1 [hep-ph] 22 Oct2013, page 12; “At the first oscillation maximum (OM), as is in the running experiments, T2K and NOνA and possible future experiments HyperK and LBNE experiments, the vacuum asymmetry is given by A ~ 0.30 *sin δ at Δ 31 =π/2 which implies that P(ν ̅ μ →ν ̅ e ) is between 1/2 and 2 times P(ν μ →ν e ). Whereas at the second oscillation maximum, the vacuum asymmetry is A ~ 0.75 *sin δ at Δ 31 =3π/2 which implies that P(ν ̅ μ →ν ̅ e ) is between 1/7 and 7 times P(ν μ →ν e ). So that experiments at the second oscillation maximum, like ESSnuSB [15], have a significantly larger divergence between the neutrino and anti-neutrino channels.” 16 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

δ CP accuracy performance (USA snowmass process, P. Coloma) for systematic errors see: Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 3, [arXiv: [hep-ph]] arXiv: [hep-ex] Neutrino "snowmass" group conclusions "default" column 17 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

CPV Discovery Performance for Future SB projects, MH unknown, Snowmass comparison 18 IDS-NF Neutrino Factory NuMAX are: 10 kton magnetized LAr detector, Baseline is 1300 km, and the parent muon energy is 5 GeV LBNO100: 100 kt LAr, 0.8 MW, 2300 km Hyper-K: 3+7 years, 0.75 MW, 500 kt WC LBNE-Full 34 kt, 0.72 MW, 5/5 years ~ 250 MW*kt*yrs. LBNE-PX 34 kt, 2.2 MW, 5/5 years ~750 MW*kt*yrs. ESSnuSB, in the figure called EUROSB: 2+8 years, 5 MW, 500 kt WC (2.5 GeV, 360 (upper)/540 km (lower)) 2020 currently running experiments by 2020 Pilar Coloma ESS 2.5 GeV 18 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

So, we should – since the ESS linac has enough power (5 MW) and thereby produces enough neutrinos - place the neutrino detector at the second oscillation maximum, i.e. at L/E ν =1500 km/GeV, which for the ESS linac with Ê ν =0.36 GeV is: L=0.36*1500=540 km WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 19

So where can we find a deep mine at the second oscillation maximum distance ca 540 km from ESS? The map shows the depth and distance from ESS/ Lund of different mines in Scandinavia. Kongsberg L=480, D=1200m 20 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Garpenberg Mine Distance from ESS Lund 540 km Depth 1232 m Truck access tunnels Two ore hoist shafts A new ore hoist schaft is planned to be ready i 1 year, leaving the two existing shafts free for other uses S D n / Gru vsjö scha ktet N yt t sc ha kt Granite drill cores 21 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

The MEMPHYS WC Detector ( MEgaton Mass PHYSics) Neutrino Oscillations (Super Beam, Beta Beam) Proton decay Astroparticles Understand the gravitational collapsing: galactic SN ν Supernovae "relics" Solar Neutrinos Atmospheric Neutrinos 500 kt fiducial volume (~20xSuperK) Readout: ~240k 8” PMTs 30% optical coverage (arXiv: hep-ex/ ) 22 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Proton Decay WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 23

WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University ESSnuSB-MEMPHYS sensitivities proton decay (arXiv: hep-ex/ ) 24

Supernova WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 25

WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University ESSnuSB-MEMPHYS sensitivities Supernova explosion and relics For 10 kpc: ~10 5 events SUPERK MEMPHYS Diffuse Supernova Neutrinos (10 years, 440 kt) 26

The ESSnuSB Collaboration 40 participating scientists from 11 institutes in Bulgaria, France, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden and UK The ESSnuSB Proposal published in Nuclear Physics B885(2014) Also available as arXiv: WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Supported by ESS, by the owner of the mine and by the local authorities In a letter to the EC H2020 Research Infrastructure Office the ESS CEO Jim Yeck writes: “Given the high scientific interest in exploring the possibility of using the future ESS linear accelerator for neutrino physics…ESS management agrees to provide information and general support for the ESSnuSB collaboration’s ongoing studies.” In a memorandum of Understanding the owner of the Garpenberg Mine, Boliden AB, authorizes ESSnuSB to access and investigate the mine and to consult with the personnel of its personnel. We have discussed with the Chair of the Dalarna Region and the Mayor of the local commune, where the mine is located, and have met a great local enthusiasm for having the detector located in Garpenberg mine. 28 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University Dalahäst Mascot of Dalarna

The Swedish Government During the two last years we have had three meetings with the Director General of Research at the Swedish Ministry of Research and Education to report on the progress in the planning of ESSnuSB. On 15 April 2015 we had a very constructive discussion with the State Secretary at the Ministry, thereby bringing the ESSnuSB project to the agenda of the Swedish government. 29 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Conclusions and summary We conclude that the ESSnuSB project: has the best physics potential for CP violation studies, compared to the other proposed Super Beam projects in the world, has a cost smaller than the other proposed projects as thee baseline accelerator is already financed and under construction, has a strong group of 11 institutes that plan to undertake specific, well planned and prepared tasks to bring the project up to a Design Report 30 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University 31 is sufficiently advanced in its concept, benefitting from the European EUROnu and Laguna-LBNO design studies and from the ESS studies, to be ready to start data taking in about 10 years from now and has, through its unique feature of providing enough beam power to focus all its statistics at the second maximum, and thereby its clear lead for CP violation discovery, and its high performance for proton decay and neutrino astroparticle research the potential to attract new collaborators

Thanks for your attention 32 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Back-up slides 33 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Systematic errors Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 3, [arXiv: [hep-ph]] 34 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Systematic errors and exposure for ESSnuSB systematic errors see [hep-ph] (lower limit "default" case, upper limit "optimistic" case) P5 requirement: 75% at 3 σ Neutrino Factory reach 10 years20 years (courtesy P. Coloma) High potentiality 35 Signal error 7.5% Bg 15% Signal error 5%, Bg 10% WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

Effect of the unknown MH on CPV performance “Def." case for systematics small effect practically no need to re-optimize when MH will be known 36 WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University

WIN2015 in Heidelberg Tord Ekelöf Uppsala University Effect of the unknown MH on CPV performance “Opt." case for systematics small effect practically no need to re-optimize when MH will be known