Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File June 18,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple Regression. Introduction In this chapter, we extend the simple linear regression model. Any number of independent variables is now allowed. We.
Advertisements

Do Government Grants to Private Charities Crowd Out Giving or Fund-raising? By James Andreoni and A. Abigail Payne.
Chapter 4 Income Statement.
Estimating the Impact of Liens on Taxpayer Compliance Behavior and Income Taxpayer Advocate Service Research & Analysis June 2012.
Taxes and Interstate Migration New Jersey Department of the Treasury Office of the Chief Economist Office of Revenue and Economic Analysis.
Behavioral experiments of alternative reporting regimes: transparency vs. burden By Laura Kalambokidis, Alex Turk, and Marsha Blumenthal Presented at the.
Income Tax Gap Overview Income Tax Gap Overview FTB/CSEA Liaison Meeting September 17, 2004.
Tax Year 2006 Individual Income Tax Underreporting Gap Drew Johns – IRS Office of Research New Research on Tax Administration: An IRS-TPC Conference June.
Revenue Audits Returns processed in a “non-judgemental” manner Revenue Audit of selected returns. Objective is to promote voluntary tax compliance. Audit.
Tracey Martin, IRS | Dec U.S. Treasury, Internal Revenue Service 2014 FSA Training Conference for Financial Aid Professionals What you Need to Know.
©2002 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Introduction to Management Accounting 12/e, Horngren/Sundem/Stratton Chapter 11 Capital Budgeting.
Multiple Regression Analysis
On The Determination of the Public Debt Robert Barro 1979.
Models with Discrete Dependent Variables
Compliance Service Collection Operation (CSCO)
Higher Education: Improved Tax Information Could Help Families Pay for College (GAO ) Presentation at the 30 th Annual SFARN Conference June 21,
ARE COMBINATION GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES MULTIPRODUCT NATURAL MONOPOLIES? - Merrile Sing Presentation Eco 435 Date 31 January 2012.
Report on the City Carrier Street Time Study January 14, 2015.
Take Charge.  Ability To Pay – a concept of tax fairness that people with different amounts of wealth or different amounts of income should pay taxes.
The Nontaxable Combat Pay Election and the EITC Suzanne Gleason and Patricia K. Tong IRS-TPC Research Conference June 18, *These views are the authors.
2014 Taxpayer Choice Model Designing Digital Communication Products to Reduce Phone and Mail Inventory Courtney Rasey and Mackenzie Wiley Internal Revenue.
Advances in Nonfiling Measures Presentation to the IRS-TPC Research Conference June 21, 2012 Mark Payne – RAS:OR: Taxpayer Analysis & Modeling Alan Plumley.
Your 403(b) Plan: Can You Set It and Forget It? What is Going on With Your 403(b)Plan? Presented by Georgette Geller, ChFC, CLU Executive Vice President.
This week its Accounting Theory
IRS Collectability Curve Taxpayer Advocate Service Research & Analysis June 2015.
Tax Administration of Self Assessment System
Chapter 13: Inference in Regression
Chapter 7: Demand Estimation and Forecasting
Contacted for Audit: What to Expect November 13, 2013 Presented by Tennessee Department of Revenue.
1 Automated Underreporter (AUR) and Correspondence Examinations Main Line Association for Continuing Education November 21, 2013 Richard G. Furlong, Jr.
Challenges in Implementation of Value Added Tax Asia Pacific Tax Conference th -18 th March, Karachi Shahid Ahmad Member (Sales Tax & Federal.
USEITI and Federal Income Tax Voluntary Disclosure Curtis Carlson Acting Director Business Revenue Division Office of Tax Analysis June 12, 2013.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Automated Collection System (ACS). 2 October 2010 ACS Mission It is the mission of ACS to collect delinquent taxes and returns through the fair and equitable.
The Collection of Municipal Fees Prepared for the City of Milwaukee Budget and Management Division By: Melissa Berger Stephen Collins Paco Fuchs Emily.
Corporate Tax Compliance: The Role of Internal and External Preparers Kenneth Klassen, Univ. of Waterloo Petro Lisowsky, Univ. of Illinois Devan Mescall,
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple.
Has Public Health Insurance for Older Children Reduced Disparities in Access to Care and Health Outcomes? Janet Currie, Sandra Decker, and Wanchuan Lin.
Tax Compliance Costs for Corporations and Partnerships: A New Look George Contos, John Guyton, Patrick Langetieg – Internal Revenue Service (RAS:OR: Taxpayer.
Bayesian Extension to the Language Model for Ad Hoc Information Retrieval Hugo Zaragoza, Djoerd Hiemstra, Michael Tipping Presented by Chen Yi-Ting.
Alabama Department of Revenue Christy Vandevender Tax Policy & Research Division.
Arrears Management Two States, Two Ways
11 th Global Conference on Environmental Taxation Issues 3 – 5 November 2010 Bangkok, Thailand Paper #24 Assessment of Fiscal Intervention Measures: Perspectives.
Managerial Economics Demand Estimation & Forecasting.
Application 3: Estimating the Effect of Education on Earnings Methods of Economic Investigation Lecture 9 1.
Chapter 7: Demand Estimation and Forecasting McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 13 Multiple Regression
Scatterplots & Regression Week 3 Lecture MG461 Dr. Meredith Rolfe.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2006 Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 2: Correlation of Time Courses of Simultaneous.
11 Chapter 5 The Research Process – Hypothesis Development – (Stage 4 in Research Process) © 2009 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 36 Personal Income Taxes.
Recording Transactions
Chapter 16 Investment and Personal Financial Planning.
PRESENTED BY FIRST NAME SURNAME JOB TITLE/POSITION A PRESENTATION TO CLIENT NAME FEDERAL BUDGET SUMMARY.
Assessing the Impact of Informality on Wages in Tanzania: Is There a Penalty for Women? Pablo Suárez Robles (University Paris-Est Créteil) 1.
 Legal requirement to file returns and pay taxes. ◦ I.R.C. Sections 6001, 6011 ◦ Regulations under § 6011  Self-assessment system. ◦ Proper form, required.
OVERVIEW OF THE TAX GAP 8 June OVERVIEW OF THE TAX GAP | 8 JUNE What the Tax Gap Is  The Gross Tax Gap is the amount of true tax liability.
AZ Tax Credit Scholarship Information Arizona Tax Credit Power Point Presentation Prepared for St. Augustine Catholic High School By Stacy DeLong.
Income and Deductions. If you have a job now, do you actually take home every dollar that you earn?  No. An average of 31% is deducted from your gross.
Interest, Surcharge & Compromise Penalties Estelita C. Aguirre, CPA, MM Lecture No. 16.
Chapter 33 Personal Income Taxes.
Demand Estimation & Forecasting
Field Collection Operations
Financial Management Financial Planning
Chapter 7: Demand Estimation and Forecasting
Chapter 7: Demand Estimation and Forecasting
Taxes and Interstate Migration
Demand Estimation & Forecasting
What is a non-compliant event?
Presentation transcript:

Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File June 18, 2015 IRS Research Conference Internal Revenue Service Small Business / Self Employed, Collection Inventory Delivery & Selection, Strategic Analysis and Modeling Saurabh Datta, Economist Stacy Orlett, Operations Research Analyst Alex Turk, Supervisory Economist DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions presented in this paper reflect those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the Internal Revenue Service

Overview IRS Return Delinquency Process ASFR Background Research Objectives Overview of ASFR Inventory Compliance/Collectability Theoretical Model Empirical Model Modeling Results Simulation Conclusion Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 2 June 2015

IRS Return Delinquency Process Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 3 June 2015

Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 4 June 2015

ASFR Background Automated Substitute for Return (ASFR) is an automated system; a key program for enforcing filing compliance. The taxpayers treated by the ASFR program have income and appear to have a tax liability and/or a filing requirement but have not responded to delinquent return notices. The ASFR process sends up to two letters of notification to the taxpayer.  Letters provide detail on income and the proposed assessment amount the IRS will make if the taxpayer does not respond  If there is no response or resolution from the taxpayer on the first letter (ASFR 30-day letter), the system prepares the Notice of Deficiency, which is mailed to the taxpayer as the ASFR 90-day letter The end goal is to secure returns, collect unpaid tax liabilities, and promote future voluntary filing compliance. Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 5 June 2015

ASFR Starts (30-day letters issued) Fiscal Years Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 6 June 2015 ASFR is working fewer cases  Securing less returns  Collecting fewer dollars Decline in ASFR Resources  Steady decline in ASFR resources since 2010 as the graph demonstrates

Taxpayer Delinquent Investigations Available ASFR Inventory Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 7 June 2015

Research Objectives Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 8 June 2015

Estimate impact on dollars collected for delinquent returns resulting from ASFR treatment Estimate the impact on subsequent voluntary filing compliance resulting from ASFR treatment  Two, three, four years after delinquent return Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 9 June 2015

Overview of ASFR Inventory Compliance/Collectability Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 10 June 2015

Overview of Dollars Collected Three years from TDI status Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 11 June 2015 Taxpayers treated by ASFR were more likely to make a payment and have higher average dollars collected Compared to those not treated.

Overview of Voluntary Filing Compliance Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 12 June 2015 At least one third of the taxpayers treated by ASFR voluntarily filed subsequent return two, three, four tax years following a TDI Taxpayers who later file their delinquent return are more likely to voluntarily file subsequent returns

Theoretical Model Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 13 June 2015

Y s =(Y-W) suggests tax authority has no income information beyond W, that is Y r =0. This is a case of non-filer Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 14 June 2015 Nash Equilibrium (if exists) Y s *

Empirical Model Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 15 June 2015

Model 1: Probability of ASFR working a case from available inventory  Probit Regression  Using Tax Year dummies as instruments Model 2: Net Dollars and Offsets Collected (within 3 years after TDI status)  Ordinary Least Square (OLS) Regression  Tobit Regression – Payments are left censored at zero dollars Model 3: Subsequent Filing Compliance (voluntarily filed their tax )  Logistic Regression Estimated separately two, three and four tax years after delinquency  X: vector of observable taxpayer characteristics  Direct Effect of ASFR  ASFR: indicator for ASFR treatment  Indirect Effect of ASFR  P(ASFR): predicted probability of ASFR working a case from available inventory Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 16 June 2015

Empirical Model Net Dollars and Offsets Collected (within 3 years of TDI status) OLS Model Y i = β 1 ASFR i + β 2 P(ASFR) i + X ik β k +e i The marginal impact on dollars collected is given by x i is a specific element of the set [ASFR i, P(ASFR) i, X ik ] Tobit Model Y i = β 1 ASFR i + β 2 P(ASFR) i + X ik β k +e i The marginal impact on dollars collected is given by x i is a specific element of the set [ASFR i, P(ASFR) i, X ik ], Ф() is the Normal distribution function and σ U is the scale parameter. Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 17 June 2015 β 1 and β 2 estimate the direct and indirect impacts of ASFR on Dollars Collected

P( File t+j ) i =F(α 1 ASFR i + α 2 P(ASFR) i + X ij α j ). File t+j represents whether the taxpayer timely filed their t+j tax return Separate regression are estimated for j=2, 3 and 4  X matrix is updated for the each of the years with new available information The marginal impact of x i on subsequent filing compliance for each of these years are computed at their sample means Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 18 June 2015 α 1 and α 2 estimate the direct and indirect impacts of ASFR on Subsequent Filing Compliance Empirical Model Subsequent Filing Compliance Voluntarily filed the tax return two, three or four tax years after TDI

Model Results Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 19 June 2015

Dollars Collected Model Results Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 20 June 2015 Increase in Dollars Collected by ASFR Treatment: Positive and Significant Marginal Effects are positive on dollars collected for ASFR treatments compared to “No Treatment”

Subsequent Voluntary Compliance Model Results Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 21 June 2015 Increase in Subsequent Compliance by ASFR Treatment: Positive, Significant and Stable Marginal direct and indirect effects of ASFR on voluntary filing compliance two, three and four years after TDI assignment Indirect effect is increasing and stable over the years as the direct effect reduces over time

Illustrating the effect of ASFR with a Simulation Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 22 June 2015

Simulation Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 23 June 2015

Simulation Results Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 24 June 2015 Increase in payments per case by working additional cases Increase in voluntary subsequent compliance by working additional cases

Simulation – Return on Investment Average cost to make an ASFR assessment is as much as $80 (Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Financial Management, Office of Cost Accounting, Cost-Based Performance Measures Automated Substitute for Return (ASFR) FY FY2013, Unpublished Internal CFO document, 2014) Thus Revenue collected relative to the cost is approximately (ignoring downstream treatment costs)  15:1 for Linear Model  40:1 using Tobit Model Every $110 spent results in an additional voluntary filed return Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 25 June 2015

Conclusions Positive direct and indirect impacts of ASFR treatment  The indirect effects are smaller than the direct effects for payment of taxes on delinquent returns  The indirect effects on subsequent filing compliance are large relative to the direct effects  Both direct and indirect effects of ASFR remain high and stable on subsequent voluntary filing compliance Simulation Results suggest working additional cases increases ASFR revenue per case and promotes subsequent voluntary filing compliance, which is stable across the years Direction for further research:  Perform similar analysis by considering all the non-filer treatment steams and impact on all taxpayers, including those who have always filed timely or at least have always resolved in the notice process  Taxpayer’s expectations may depend on past probability of whether getting selected for treatment or not. This feature needs to be incorporated appropriately in the model  Extend the existing modeling framework by estimating dollars collected and subsequent voluntary compliance simultaneously in simultaneous equation framework Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File 26 June 2015

Thank You! Individual Non-Filers and IRS Generated Tax Assessments: Revenue and Compliance Impacts of IRS Substitute Assessment When Taxpayers Don’t File Internal Revenue Service Small Business / Self Employed, Collection Inventory Delivery & Selection, Strategic Analysis and Modeling Saurabh Datta, Economist Stacy Orlett, Operations Research Analyst Alex Turk, Supervisory Economist DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions presented in this paper reflect those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the Internal Revenue Service