Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
Guidelines for honors theses for Computer Science, Computer Systems Engineering, and Informatics March 2013.
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know … and Share with You.
The University of Arizona Academic Program Review Orientation April 2015.
Assessment in the Biology Department in AY Caroline Solomon Friday December 5.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Cyber Education Project Accreditation Committee November 2014.
Why Bother? The Road To A Quality Information Literacy Assessment Study.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Assessing Students Preparedness to Compete and Succeed in a Global Economy Through Written Communications Robert A. Chin & Carolyn Dunn Donna Hollar Department.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
A Process for the Direct Assessment of Program Learning Outcomes Based on the Principles and Practices of Software Engineering Robert W. Lingard California.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
A. ABET Update i. Overview of documents submitted to ABET (Self-Study) EWRE Retreat 8/2/2005 ii. What we need to do between now and ABET visit in November.
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
FIRST WORKSHOP ON PREPARATION FOR THE 3 rd ROUND OF ABET VISIT Samir Al-Baiyat Dean, College of Engineering Sciences, KFUPM SEPTEMBER 19, 2006.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
Preparing for an Accreditation Visit David Workman, Susan Bethel (CS) Ron DeMara, Damla Turgut (Cpe) Kalpathy Sundarum (EE) School of Electrical Engineering.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
Lane CSEE Faculty Meeting October 14, 2009 Agenda: ABET Thank You ABET Results ABET Followup.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Assessment Planning. Introduction Assessment is essential to creating a culture of continuous improvement – It provides input for the enhancement.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Department: Sociology Chair: Julie M. Ford Assessment Coordinator: Elliot.
IS Faculty Perceptions of ABET Accreditation Presented by Bruce White and Wendy Ceccucci.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Semester Conversion CPP Academic Senate March 12 th by F.A.Neto Semester Conversion Director 3/12/20141FAN.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 25, 20071/9 ABET Accreditation Brief, rough history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials,
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Learning 1.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Update on ABET Assessment Work
Architectural Engineering Department. AE151  Teaching the students all about the drawing methods and techniques using CAD programs in 2D Architectural.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
ECE791 Senior Design Experience Project Requirements and Timeline.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Outcomes Assessment in Computer Science Robert Lingard Assessment Coordinator August 27,
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
ABET 101 What has happened so far? When is the ABET visit? Faculty Responsibilities Assessment Process.
Industry Advisory Board May 30 th, 2014
Course Overview Stephen M. Thebaut, Ph.D. University of Florida Software Engineering.
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
Strategic Planning Council December 8, 2006
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Five-Year Undergraduate Enrollments
Curriculum Coordinator: Minhua Wang Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Curriculum Coordinator: Ron Tavernier Date of Presentation: 1/15/16
Michelle Cox, Nursing Emily Garber, PTA.
SLO Assessment and Program Review
A Process for the Direct Assessment of Program Learning Outcomes Based on the Principles and Practices of Software Engineering Robert W. Lingard California.
Presentation transcript:

Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003

Computer Science Accreditation Team Robert Lingard Diane Schwartz Steven Stepanek

Current Activities Gathering course descriptions for all courses in the program including course objectives for all courses. Gathering course descriptions for all courses in the program including course objectives for all courses. Gathering course materials for all course not scheduled to be taught next semester. Gathering course materials for all course not scheduled to be taught next semester. Gathering information about faculty members. Gathering information about faculty members. Gathering assessment data (the emphasis is on the direct assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and closing the loop). Gathering assessment data (the emphasis is on the direct assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and closing the loop). First draft of Self-Study Report to be completed by December First draft of Self-Study Report to be completed by December 2006.

Assessment Activities Alumni survey Alumni survey Employer survey Employer survey Senior student survey Senior student survey Direct assessment of several key student learning outcomes Direct assessment of several key student learning outcomes

Student Learning Outcomes Recently or Currently Being Assessed Demonstrate an understanding of algorithms and data structures. Demonstrate an understanding of algorithms and data structures. Demonstrate an understanding of programming language concepts. Demonstrate an understanding of programming language concepts. Demonstrate an understanding of computer organization and architecture. Demonstrate an understanding of computer organization and architecture. Demonstrate knowledge of a variety of programming languages paradigms. Demonstrate knowledge of a variety of programming languages paradigms. Demonstrate proficiency in using a high-level computer language. Demonstrate proficiency in using a high-level computer language. Demonstrate an understanding of emerging technologies and a working knowledge of currently available software tools. Demonstrate an understanding of emerging technologies and a working knowledge of currently available software tools. Demonstrate an understanding of the principles and practices for software design and development. Demonstrate an understanding of the principles and practices for software design and development. Be able to effectively communicate in written form. Be able to effectively communicate in written form.

Process for Direct Assessment

Direct Assessment Process Details 1. At the third department meeting during the spring semester, course coordinators for each of our “course groups” are elected. 2. During the first month of the spring semester the Assessment Committee will identify the program outcomes to be assessed during the current calendar year and present this list for department approval no later than the first department meeting in March.

Direct Assessment Process Details (cont’d) 3. Upon department approval, assessment responsibility for each selected outcome is assigned to one of the course group coordinators. Prior to the first department meeting in April, each course coordinator will prepare an assessment plan. 4. Once the assessment plans are approved, the course group coordinators ensure that the assessment activities are accomplished and prepare a final report, prior to the last Department meeting of the year.

Direct Assessment Process Details (cont’d) 5. Prior to the third Department meeting of the spring semester the reports of all Course Groups are analyzed and recommendations for program improvements are made. 6. During the third meeting of the spring semester, the program improvement recommendations from the Assessment Committee are discussed, and the Department decides what actions are appropriate based on the recommendations. The process then loops back to step 1.

Sample Assessment Results

Sample Program Improvement Recommendations Based on Assessment Results Based on the assessment of the Outcome “Demonstrate an understanding of the principles and practices for software design and development” the following recommendations were made: Based on the assessment of the Outcome “Demonstrate an understanding of the principles and practices for software design and development” the following recommendations were made: Introductory courses in the program should introduce certain software engineering concepts and elective courses reinforce the principles and practices for software design and development. Introductory courses in the program should introduce certain software engineering concepts and elective courses reinforce the principles and practices for software design and development. STATUS: This was approved and the members of the Software Engineering Course Group will provide information to assist in appropriately revising course objectives. STATUS: This was approved and the members of the Software Engineering Course Group will provide information to assist in appropriately revising course objectives. It was recommended that Comp 480, Software Systems Development, be made a required course in the program. It was recommended that Comp 480, Software Systems Development, be made a required course in the program. STATUS: This was tabled by the department until more assessment data could be collected to substantiate the need for this change. This outcome will be reassessed this year. STATUS: This was tabled by the department until more assessment data could be collected to substantiate the need for this change. This outcome will be reassessed this year.