1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CM-22 Magnet Issues, 6 June MICE Magnet Cool Down and Other Issues Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA

Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.

10 June 2006MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Can MICE Solid and Liquid Absorbers be Characterized to better than 0.3 Percent? Michael A. Green 1, and.

The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction

MICE Superconducting Solenoids: Status and Update RAL: T W Bradshaw M Courthold J Rochford M Hills D Baynham Oxford: J Cobb W Lau S Yang MICE.

Plans for 201-MHz Cavities Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory November 18, 2010.

CM-18 June The Measurement and Monitoring of the Field from the MICE Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, USA Frank Filthaut.

MICE Absorber cryostat Forces and power dissipation - for normal operation and during a magnet quench Elwyn Baynham James Rochford MICE Meeting November.

MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA

RF Measurement Plan Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 20, 2011 MICE Video Conference Meeting.

Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.

UPDATE of RFCC MOUDLE Derun Li, Steve Gourlay Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE MICO Meeting December 21, 2011.

Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.

Agreement on scope of supply and extent of interface among different suppliers of the AFC module This talk covers the scope of supply on the Absorber Focus.

Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System

The 23 rd MICE Collaboration Meeting -1- ICST/HIT Jan.13 to 17, Harbin/China Large Prototype Coil Test and Plan Fengyu Xu Institute of Cryogenics.

Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.

Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 MICE Mtg Oct 2002 Elwyn Baynham RAL Focussing Absorber Magnet Elwyn Baynham ; Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov ; Jim Rochford Applied Science Division.

1 Issues concerning the Design of the Tracker Solenoids Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 17 August 2005.

Cooling Channel Summary Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration.

1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.

1 Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Cost Update Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 10 February 2005.

MICE RF Module Safety Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting February 12, 2005.

MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

MICE Magnetic forces James Rochford Elwyn Baynham AFC working group meeting RAL 23 April 2004.

9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 The Genoa Tracker Solenoids and their Contribution toward a New Design Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pasquale Fabbricatore.

1 Quench Protection and the Power Supplies for the MICE Focusing and Coupling Magnets Michael A Green Lawrence Berkley Laboratory 10 February 2005.

Μ-beam Absorber 1Absorber 2Absorber 3RF 1RF 2 Vacuum LH2 Warm window Windows in MICE: Option 1 (as currently designed) ISIS Safety officer’s comment: If.

Talk outline 1 st talk: –Magnetic forces –Quench in the absorber cryostat 2 nd talk: –Shielding of magnetic fringe fields.

1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.

Status of 201 MHz Prototype and RFCC Module Derun Li, S. Virostek, M. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory In collaboration.

MICE Collaboration Meeting 17 CERN 21 – 25 Feb 2007 Summary on Magnet & MICE Integration talks By Oxford University.

RFCC Module Tech Board Schedule Discussion Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL November 4, 2009.

1 Technical Arguments in Favor of using the Cryomech PT-415 Cooler for Cooling the LH 2 Experiment Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.

Magnet and Absorber Heat Loads and Cooling with Various Small Coolers

12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.

MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Is the the pulse tube cooler a must or is it simply better for the MICE AFC module? Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley.

MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin, China 13 – 17 January 2009 Integration Issues By Wing Lau, Oxford University.

RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module

17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.

Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.

MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.

Status of RFCC-Module Development Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting at INFN-LNF, Frascati,

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.

Magnet quench during a training run Successfully trained to peak currents and operationally tested Thermal performance requirements met 3D magnetic bore.

MICE Coupling Coil Update Steve Virostek for Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICO January 23, 2013 January 23, 2013.

Some Thoughts on Magnetic Measurements for MICE Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720, USA.

Abstract: The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) is an international effort sited at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which will demonstrate ionization.

MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.

MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.

Magnet vacuum vessel w/radiation shield and cold mass in place Magnet leads (left) and the three cryocoolers on the top of the spectrometer solenoid service.

MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.

MICE Coupling Coil Testing at Fermilab All Experimenters Meeting Ruben Carcagno March 19, R. Carcagno - MICE CC Testing at Fermilab3/19/2012.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module Plan and Progress Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.

MICE/MuCool Coupling Magnets to 22 ICST/HIT MICE/Muool Coupling Magnets Progress Li Wang for MICE Group Institute of Cryogenics.

1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,

22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.

MICE RF Coupling Coil Magnets Update Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory October 6, 2010 Sofia, Bulgaria.

1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.

Progress on MICE RFCC Module for the MICE Experiment * Allan DeMello, Nord Andresen, Michael Green, Derun Li, Heng Pan, Steve Virostek, Michael Zisman.

1 OPTICS OF MICE STEP V.0 Ulisse Bravar University of New Hampshire 26 June 2005.

MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.

201 MHz Cavity Plans Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February 11, 2011 MAP Friday Video Conference Meeting.

MICE Coupling Coil Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.

Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green

Presentation transcript:

1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005

2 3D View of the MICE Cooling Channel AFC Module RFCC Module Coupling Magnet Cryostat Courtesy of S. Yang Oxford University

3 Three Quarter Section View of the MICE Cooling Channel Coupling Coil Focusing Magnet Coil Courtesy of S. Yang Oxford University

4 Half Section View of the MICE Cooling Channel Coupling Coil Focusing Magnet Coil Liquid Hydrogen Absorber 201 MHz RF Cavities Courtesy of S. Yang Oxford University

5 Cooling Channel Magnet Progress The cooling channel consists of three AFC modules and two RFCC modules. This report will discuss the progress made since the last meeting on the focusing magnet and the coupling magnet. Progress on the tracker magnet (detector magnet) will not be presented. This information was presented on June 27th.

6 Focusing Magnet

7 The MICE AFC Module Courtesy of S. Yang Oxford University

8 The Center of the MICE AFC Module Magnet Mandrel Safety Window LH 2 Pipes Liquid Helium Feed Pipe Gas He Pipe Hydrogen Window S/C Coil #1 LH 2 Absorber S/C Coil #2 Coil Cover Plate Courtesy of S. Yang Oxford University

9 The Focusing Magnet Parameters These are the worst cases based on p = 240 MeV/c and b = 420 mm

10 Focusing Magnet Progress Progress has been made on the focusing magnet quench protection system and in the power system for the magnets. The quench simulations show that the focusing magnets can be passively quenched without a formal quench protection system. The three focusing magnets can be connected in series. External diodes and resistors are used to control the voltages across the coils.

11 Focusing Magnet Quench One Magnet & 3 in Series

A Focusing Magnet Quench Flip Mode & Non-flip Mode

13 Focusing Magnet Mandrel T after a Quench in the Flip Mode Max T = 51.9 K Min T = 4.41 K Quench Time = 4 s I start = A  = ~0.80 p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

14 Focusing Magnet Mandrel T after a Quench in the Non-flip Mode Max T = 41.7 K Min T = 4.69 K Quench Time = 4 s I start = A  = ~0.80 p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

15 Focusing Magnet Mandrel Hot Spot T as a Function of Time Max T = 51.9 K Min T = 4.41 K Quench Time = 4 s I start = A  = ~0.80 p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm Quench back occurs. Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

16 Focusing Magnet Power System

17 Coupling Magnet

18 The MICE RFCC Module Coupling Magnet Cavity RF Coupler Dished Be Window RF Cavity Module Vacuum Vessel Vacuum Pump Magnet Vacuum Vessel Courtesy of S. Yang Oxford University

19 Coupling Magnet Parameters

20 Coupling Magnet Progress Progress has been made on the coupling magnet quench protection system and in the power system for the magnets. The quench simulations show that the coupling magnets can be passively quenched without a formal quench protection system. The two coupling magnets can be connected in series, but it may be better to power the two magnets separately. Cold diodes and resistors are used to control the voltages within the coils.

21 Coupling Magnet Quench One & Two Magnets in Series

22 Coupling Magnet Quench 6061-T6 and 1100-O Mandrels

23 Coupling Magnet Mandrel T after a Quench in the Flip Mode Max T = 83.9 K Min T = 4.21 K Quench Time = 5 s  = ~0.92 p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

24 Coupling Magnet Mandrel Hot Spot T as a Function of Time Max T = 83.9 K Min T = 4.21 K Quench Time = 5 s  = ~0.92 p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm Quench back occurs. Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

25 Coupling Magnet Power System

26 Coupling between Magnet Circuits

27 Coupling Coefficients between Coils Magnet Circuit Self Inductance and the Mutual Inductances in the Flip Mode Magnet Circuit Self Inductance and the Mutual Inductance in the Non-flip Mode Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

28 Conclusions from the Self and Mutual Inductance Calculations Every magnet circuit in MICE is coupled to every other magnet circuit in MICE. The charging or discharging of one magnet circuit will affect every other magnet circuit, but the power supplies can handle the effect. A quench of one magnet circuit will not drive other magnets normal by changing the currents too much. AC losses induced by a quench do not appear to be a factor, except from mandrel heating.

29 Coupling between Magnet Coil Circuits and other Magnet Mandrels

30 Currents for Various Cases and the Coupling Coefficients Coil Currents for Various Cases where p = 240 MeV/c and  = 420 mm Coil to Mandrel Coupling Coefficients for Various Cases Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

31 Heating of the Coupling Mandrel by a Focusing Quench (Flip Mode) Max T = 4.45 K Min T = 4.41 K Quench Time = 4  = ~ p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm A quench of the focusing magnet circuit is unlikely to quench the coupling magnet in the flip mode. Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

32 Heating of the Coupling Mandrel by a Focusing Quench (Non-flip Mode) Max T = 4.76 K Min T = 4.69 K Quench Time = 4 s  = ~ p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm A quench of the focusing magnet circuit may quench the coupling magnet in the non-flip mode, at high momenta. Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

33 Heating of the Focusing Mandrel by a Coupling Quench (Flip Mode) Max T = 6.30 K Min T = 4.22 K Quench Time = 5 s  = ~ p = 240 MeV/c  = 420 mm A quench of the coupling magnet circuit is likely to quench the focusing magnet in either mode. Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

34 Coupling Coefficients between Magnet Circuits and Various Mandrels The quench of a cooling channel magnet circuit is unlikely to cause a quench of a tracker magnet. A tracker magnet quench won’t quench the channel magnets. Courtesy of H. Witte Oxford University

35 Conclusions from the Magnet Coupling Calculations A quench of a focusing magnet is unlikely to quench any other magnet except the coupling magnet at high muon momenta in the non-flip mode. A quench of a coupling magnet is likely to quench the focusing magnet except at low muon momenta. A coupling magnet quench will not quench the tracking magnet. A quench of the tracker magnet is unlikely to quench any of the other magnets in MICE.

36 Concluding Comments Engineering progress has been made on all of the MICE magnets and their sub-systems. Quench calculations show that the MICE focusing and coupling magnets will quench safely. It is probable that the detector magnets will also quench safely. This will be verified before the next meeting. A coupling magnet quench will cause the focusing magnet to quench, but a quench of the other magnets is unlikely to cause a quench of other magnets in MICE.